Miyani
Posts: 248
Joined: 12/4/2007 Status: offline
|
Here's my take on it. The word "no," in certain contexts, ends the discussion. It would be more accurate, I think, to say that in many of the dynamics mentioned, outright REFUSAL is forbidden. I haven't personally come across any dynamics where a slave will be punished for saying no as an answer to "Did you mess up today?" What they will be punished for, and what my boy will be punished for, is refusing an order without giving a reason. "I'd prefer not to, my knees hurt today." "I don't think I can, the thought of being gagged makes me want to cry." Both of those signify reluctance, but they allow the conversation to continue, and a compromise to be reached (or, they allow me to go ahead and order what I want anyway, but make me aware of potential repercussions). So, they're both acceptable. "No." What do I do with no? There isn't any way for me to know whether he's refusing because he doesn't feel like it (bad idea), because there's something physical going on (we'll work around it or do it later), or because he's terrified due to some childhood trauma (oh honey, come here and let me kiss it better). So sure, he gets "no." He'd sure as hell better use "no" when I ask him if he was playing WoW all day. But he does not have the right to simply end a discussion of an order with a refusal, which I believe is the spirit in which "you can't say no" is meant. Edited because, seriously, I can't type right now.
|