RE: Women's Rights!

RE: Women's Rights! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

MadamesezSTFU -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 3:25:13 AM)
quote: I am not here to recieve personal insults from an inbred hickabilly like you. Learn some manners. You are vulgar. This is the religion and political forum. You have not contributed anything relevant to the post. If you came to collarme to make wise cracks and attack individuals rather than issues I suggest you go to a private chat. room. quote: ORIGINAL: belladevine Actually the post is about women's rights. I have the right to bitch about circumcised men. I am not here to make loop de loo with morons. Quite frankley...nobody in this forum has enough nads to humiliate me. Actually,like you, I have the same rights. Therefore, like your views on circumcision, I have views on vapid, attention-whore type women. As much right as you have to push your non topic related comments on the user of this forum, I have the same ones to respond to you.I have the right to make fun of ignorant peeps. You have the right to bitch about circumsized men, and no worries I'm sure the sane ones run as fast as their legs will carry them, and I'm pretty sure they will be hiding their dangly bits around you, instead of exposing them to you. If you think you will bully me off the forums, I have some sad news for you; I can pretty much guarantee there isn't enough dynamite to get me off the boards. If I bother your sensitivities that badly, might I suggest the use of your hide button, Of course, you won't be able to see what I say, and you say that noone in these forum has enough nads to humiliate you. First of all, I dont have nads (and here you talk like an expert about them)and second, suprisingly enough, I'm the only one you got ugly with when there were many more that said ugly things to you. Although I'm sure you are used to it, for some reason MY posts bothered you. Would you like a hankie? or maybe some big girl panties? I have not been vulgar, and I actually "dumbed down" a lot of my words just for you. Last pointer; when you are calling someone out to be an "inbred hickabilly", it helps to actually use the word hillbilly like you were going for, and frankley is spelled frankly. Just sayin.....

thishereboi -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 4:18:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heartcream No woman with an ounce of sense would want to use abortion as birth control it is way too much on the body to do so. Doctors wouldnt simply keep aborting fetuses in the same woman over and over so it wouldnt happen like that anyway. My friend got pregnant 3 times in 4 months. The doctors had no problems aborting the first two times. The last time, she miscarried. Now she is upset because she is afraid she won't be able to get pregnant again and have more children. My guess is, they will do the procedure as many times as you wave the cash to get it done. I doubt they care if your a repeat customer or not. At least her doctor didn't.

thishereboi -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 4:32:01 AM)
quote: Unwanted babies are being born every day from women who couldn't afford an abortion, so how on earth are they going to find the cash to raise the kid. You want another 5-10 years of this? Don't leave out the women who after realizing they can't afford the abortion, will go out and try to do it themselves. We can go back to finding dead girls in back alleys because the butchers they could afford didn't have a clue what they were doing. Let's hear it for progress.

thishereboi -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 4:44:47 AM)
quote: I am not here to recieve personal insults from an inbred hickabilly like you. In that case, quit posting such vile, stupid shit. At this point I think your begging for insults. Learn some manners. You are vulgar. So says the poster child for vulgar This is the religion and political forum. You have not contributed anything relevant to the post. And you think your constant whining about circumcision is relevant. By the way, you never answered my question....Are you hiding a dick under there and did your parents mutilate it for you? If you came to collarme to make wise cracks and attack individuals rather than issues I suggest you go to a private chat. room. Well you can try, but I seriously doubt your going to get anyone to go in a private room with you. That's just scary.

LadyAngelika -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 5:09:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: heartcream No woman with an ounce of sense would want to use abortion as birth control it is way too much on the body to do so. Doctors wouldnt simply keep aborting fetuses in the same woman over and over so it wouldnt happen like that anyway. My friend got pregnant 3 times in 4 months. The doctors had no problems aborting the first two times. The last time, she miscarried. Now she is upset because she is afraid she won't be able to get pregnant again and have more children. My guess is, they will do the procedure as many times as you wave the cash to get it done. I doubt they care if your a repeat customer or not. At least her doctor didn't. You are absolutely right about this, though I would guess to say that she is exception and not the rule. I know that here, when a woman goes for an abortion, in private clinics at least, they have a consultation session to find out if one of the reasons they had an unwanted pregnancy was due to a lack of understanding of how to avoid them. As for your friend, I'm not a medical expert, but from the literature I have read, there is no data that proves that abortions themselves cause infertility. However the infection that can occur post abortion can cause infertility. And the risk of having one of these infections increase when the job is done in a clinic that isn't up to standards. - LA

xBullx -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 5:16:12 AM)
I'll give you a quick bit of advice from my experience. Just be yourself, you'll attract the type of female that is for you that way. Your opinions are certainly not going to appeal to everyone, but to grovel and pander to the wenches hoping for scraps of approval and affection leaves you looking pretty......kept. Though hanging around here with an open mind will help you grow as a man. quote: ORIGINAL: goldenwyrm1968 quote: ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika quote: ORIGINAL: WyldHrt quote: And he's a D WyldHrt... not a bad looking D neither ;-) Like I didn't check his profile, LA.... he's taken [>:] [8D] I checked and when I saw D, well yanno... I'm kinda partial to the s-types myself. Oh and to goldenwyrm1968, welcome to the board :-) I'm sure you'll have many women perving your profile ;-) - LA Really? Are the choices of Online Doms that bad?

LadyAngelika -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 5:19:54 AM)
Psst.... he's told the girls he's "taken". I have a whole other vision of a taking a man but this isn't the forum for that. Though I will say, to keep all this on topic, my strap-on is a very good form of birth control! ;-) - LA

xBullx -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 5:37:06 AM)
After watching the drunk little slave boy make a joke out of virtually everything last night, I'm rather disappointed at the course this thread took. But I suppose having males around like mikey leaves you gals feeling...................ah, something. But I do appreciate those that actually understood, were open minded and made constructive comments. quote: ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika Psst.... he's told the girls he's "taken". I have a whole other vision of a taking a man but this isn't the forum for that. Though I will say, to keep all this on topic, my strap-on is a very good form of birth control! ;-) - LA

BoiJen -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 5:46:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: xBullx I'll give you a quick bit of advice from my experience. Just be yourself, you'll attract the type of female that is for you that way. Your opinions are certainly not going to appeal to everyone, but to grovel and pander to the wenches hoping for scraps of approval and affection leaves you looking pretty......kept. Though hanging around here with an open mind will help you grow as a man. I know it wasn't directed at me...but I really liked this little tid bit.

KatyLied -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 5:48:06 AM)
fr As a pro-choice, pro-women should decide what goes on with their bodies - - Again, and always, I am taken aback when people who proclaim to be pro-life take the stance that abortion is acceptable in cases of rape/incest. Why do those circumstances make something unacceptable to you acceptable? Why is the value of that life less than a life conceived in another manner? I will never understand the argument.

xBullx -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:44:19 AM)
Hi Katy, Thanks for dropping by. I really am pro-freedom, if someone isn't a "slave" they should have a choice. And since slavery on the whole is illegal I'm left to ponder a thing or two. I don't believe some girl somewhere has any effect on my soul or person if I'm not directly involved. I do however dislike this attitude that a girl has a choice at any point, but a man only has choice at the initial decision to copulate. Now like I said earlier I passed on my values of personal responsibility to my sons so I think I've preformed my moral obligation. Trust me, I don't want a bunch of unclaimed children out there, but that's just the point; there are tons of them out there now and abortion is legal, and I might add available. So it seems we have a deeper issue to tackle here and by robbing the male population of a freedom that some preport is so vital to the liberties of women seems rather counter productive and a bit disingenuous when defending personal liberty. And saying it should be fair for women on one hand and then as mikey stated life isn't always fair when it comes to a males position seems also a bit hypocritical at best. Maybe we should seek a real solution to our lack of personal responsibility issues. Just sayin'..........[;)]

Moonhead -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:47:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: xBullx I see your point Angelika, but I'm curious about the way you responded to this... What if the guy didn't mean for her to get pregnant, what if he was coerced into sex or the condom broke or her pills were "accidently" forgotten? Shouldn't a guy have a choice to have her abort? I mean she's walking around with his swimmer held hostage in her egg. So if the Government will pay for her abortion will it not now pay his child support if she wants the baby and he doesn't? I mean considering Moonheads position fairs, fair, right? quote: ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika quote: I do everything I can to prevent it. I do as well. I protect myself many ways and believe in planning parenthood. Also, when I drive a car down the street, I do everything I can to prevent an accident. Reality is, accidents happen. And they happen to people who were being extra careful. We can't start judging who deserves a funded abortion and who doesn't. What do you say of the young girl who gets slipped some GHB and winds up pregnant? Or the girl who get raped? Or the girl who is on the pill and still gets pregnant? The condom that breaks combined with the morning after pill that doesn't work? The diaphragm that wasn't fitted properly? The woman who has an IUD and still gets pregnant? There is no method of contraception that is full proof other than abstinence of male-female vaginal penetration. Even then... swapping fluids during mutual masturbation can lead to pregnancy. Imagine how humiliating it would be to have to go through a triage to determine if you did everything you could to avoid getting pregnant. - LA You seem to have completely missed my point, Bull. You're already paying for social security to keep the underclass fed and housed, are you not? With abortions covered under a single payer system (and as that's about as likely to happen at this point as Sarah Palin campaigning for gay rights, this whole argument is really a squabble about what colour a unicorn's horn is) that'd reduce the cost of welfare spending a bit. More abortions = a less numerous welfare dependent underclass. (It'd be cheaper still to provide sex education or allow teenagers to buy rubbers in the Bible belt, of course, but that would be just plain evil.)

xBullx -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:48:49 AM)
Hi Jen you cute lil bugger, I didn't see this post straight away. I should have worded that final sentence better, try this on for size: "Though hanging around here with an open mind will help you grow as a man, woman, boi or a gurl"[:)] I'm not sure if the sissy fellows have a special spelled word of there own. quote: ORIGINAL: BoiJen quote: ORIGINAL: xBullx I'll give you a quick bit of advice from my experience. Just be yourself, you'll attract the type of female that is for you that way. Your opinions are certainly not going to appeal to everyone, but to grovel and pander to the wenches hoping for scraps of approval and affection leaves you looking pretty......kept. Though hanging around here with an open mind will help you grow as a man. I know it wasn't directed at me...but I really liked this little tid bit.

Elisabella -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:49:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: KatyLied fr As a pro-choice, pro-women should decide what goes on with their bodies - - Again, and always, I am taken aback when people who proclaim to be pro-life take the stance that abortion is acceptable in cases of rape/incest. Why do those circumstances make something unacceptable to you acceptable? Why is the value of that life less than a life conceived in another manner? I will never understand the argument. When I was pro-life I didn't feel that way. I felt abortion was the taking of an innocent life no matter what, and that while women had the right to choose what to do with their bodies they didn't have the power of life or death over their child's body. Anyway, saying it can be legal for rape (not incest, unless the incest was nonconsensual, in which case, it's rape) isn't saying it's okay in those circumstances, it's more like the "temporary insanity"defense - sure you killed someone, but the circumstances made you nuts. And also, not all anti-abortion stances are about sanctity of life, some people feel that it's wrong to abort if you chose to have sex knowing that no BC is foolproof, but if you didn't make the choice to have sex, it's different. Anyway abortion is legal in the US, that's not the issue. I'm kinda dismayed at all the posts saying that if abortion isn't put on a national healthcare bill women will go in back alleys to abort - it's not on a national healthcare bill right now, and that really doesn't happen all that much. I can't imagine the number of backalley abortions will suddenly spike if a healthcare bill passes that doesn't influence abortion in any way.

tazzygirl -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:49:59 AM)
morning Master Bull perhaps we are looking at part of this from the wrong angle. once the child is born, the child becomes protected under the law and is entitled to support from both parents. the child didnt ask to be here, and he or she is truly the only unwilling participant to the whole affair. someone has to support the kid. the state (and federal) laws insist that both parents will. if the child is on welfare, then the parent who does not have physical custody pays the state. i have often wondered why, with the advent of so much medical advances, why medicine has not found a better form of birth control for men than the condom.

Moonhead -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:50:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: xBullx Hi Katy, Thanks for dropping by. I really am pro-freedom, if someone isn't a "slave" they should have a choice. And since slavery on the whole is illegal I'm left to ponder a thing or two. I don't believe some girl somewhere has any effect on my soul or person if I'm not directly involved. I do however dislike this attitude that a girl has a choice at any point, but a man only has choice at the initial decision to copulate. Now like I said earlier I passed on my values of personal responsibility to my sons so I think I've preformed my moral obligation. Trust me, I don't want a bunch of unclaimed children out there, but that's just the point; there are tons of them out there now and abortion is legal, and I might add available. So it seems we have a deeper issue to tackle here and by robbing the male population of a freedom that some preport is so vital to the liberties of women seems rather counter productive and a bit disingenuous when defending personal liberty. And saying it should be fair for women on one hand and then as mikey stated life isn't always fair when it comes to a males position seems also a bit hypocritical at best. Maybe we should seek a real solution to our lack of personal responsibility issues. Just sayin'..........[;)] My own feeling is that women are entitled to more of a say about this as they're the ones who get their health and their figure wrecked carrying the kid for nine months.

xBullx -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:53:22 AM)
I actually understand your point Moon, but I have also been trying to get the feminists to consider that nothing comes free. Freedom in America has afterall became a two way street. If you cant force reason or kill them with kindness, it's best to bash their brains in with logic.

xBullx -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:55:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead quote: ORIGINAL: xBullx Hi Katy, Thanks for dropping by. I really am pro-freedom, if someone isn't a "slave" they should have a choice. And since slavery on the whole is illegal I'm left to ponder a thing or two. I don't believe some girl somewhere has any effect on my soul or person if I'm not directly involved. I do however dislike this attitude that a girl has a choice at any point, but a man only has choice at the initial decision to copulate. Now like I said earlier I passed on my values of personal responsibility to my sons so I think I've preformed my moral obligation. Trust me, I don't want a bunch of unclaimed children out there, but that's just the point; there are tons of them out there now and abortion is legal, and I might add available. So it seems we have a deeper issue to tackle here and by robbing the male population of a freedom that some preport is so vital to the liberties of women seems rather counter productive and a bit disingenuous when defending personal liberty. And saying it should be fair for women on one hand and then as mikey stated life isn't always fair when it comes to a males position seems also a bit hypocritical at best. Maybe we should seek a real solution to our lack of personal responsibility issues. Just sayin'..........[;)] My own feeling is that women are entitled to more of a say about this as they're the ones who get their health and their figure wrecked carrying the kid for nine months. While that may be true it falls flat in the face of logical reasoning.... Lady Liberty is after all..........................blind.

Moonhead -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:58:27 AM)
Fair enough. At least you're making an effort to address that point, instead of ignoring it.

Moonhead -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:59:57 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: xBullx My own feeling is that women are entitled to more of a say about this as they're the ones who get their health and their figure wrecked carrying the kid for nine months. While that may be true it falls flat in the face of logical reasoning.... Lady Liberty is after all..........................blind. Not really. It isn't like the mother can walk out on a pregnancy as soon as she misses her period, is it? A lot of guys do. (edited for quotery)

Page: << < prev 14 15 [16] 17 18 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875