RE: Women's Rights! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Elisabella -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:27:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

If some people (not "most", as you erroneously wrote) have an issue with it, that's their problem. Others have an issue with having to pay into the pool to give men vasectomies, because they're not men. Others don't like to provide health coverage for people who catch the pox because they screwed the wrong person. Yet again, some individuals believe that if you catch cancer, it's karmic retribution, and you should fork out forthe chemo and radiotherapy out of pocket [8|] .



You're right, I wrote that wrong. What I meant to say was that most people who have an issue with it, have an issue with elective abortion, not with aborting when the fetus will endanger the mother's life or health.

I really don't care about the *reasons* why a woman gets pregnant or gets cancer, it's irrelevant to whether or not treatment is medically necessary, and making it into a moral issue completely overrides the real point which is: this is a healthcare bill, not a generalized social welfare bill.

I have no problem with government providing assistance for abortions but please fucking do it right. Give funding to clinics who use a specific sliding scale of fees that ends in zero cost for a certain income bracket. Don't try to slip it into a healthcare bill. Same with things like methadone clinics or vasectomies or even birth control - the fact that these things aren't available to everyone is a problem, but there are better ways to fix it than this.

quote:

In the end, it doesn't matter what you think:it remains between the patient and her doctor. Because of this, it's a health issue.


Pregnancy is a health issue, the decision to terminate is a social issue. And as I said above, if the only requirement for federal funding is that there's a doctor involved and that it's legal, that covers a whole range of procedures.

quote:

I'm so sick and tired of people like you trying to infringe on other people's rights just to push their politics upon everyone else... leave us aborting bitches alone :-) .


What rights am I infringing on? Not the right to terminate, not even the not-yet-a-right to have government pay for abortion. I'm just saying keep it out of a general public healthcare bill and deal with it like any other social welfare issue.

quote:


PS: and don't forget this... it's not because a pregnancy is 'healthy' that the woman is going to be okay. Childbirth is one of the most dangerous thing any human being can do.


This is very true, but I think it's reaching. Driving a car is even more dangerous, but you're not going to have healthcare pay for airbags.

Oh and this:

quote:

Tell me... was it Jesus that told you to be so judgemental?


Have you read the Bible? LOL

“Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment.” John 7:24

“Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. 35 For I have come to ‘set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’; 36 and ‘a man’s enemies will be those of his own household.’[a] 37 He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. 38 And he who does not take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me. 39 He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for My sake will find it. Matthew 10:34-39

"Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?"" Matthew 23:33 in the middle of a huge passage about how awful the Phairisees were.

And there's quite a bit more beyond the direct quotes but the gist is - revere that which is holy and destroy that which is sinful. "Judge not, lest ye be judged" is a command against hypocrisy, not a command for tolerance.




kittinSol -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:28:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: came4U

quote:

Tell me... was it Jesus that told you to be so judgemental?


Do you need a map as to what that is??? or will she be back to contemplate abortion #8?


It's incredible how bigotted bigots truly are. You need to reflect on your faith, because I'm pretty sure it tells you to do the very opposite of what you're currently indulging in (and I have no doubt that for you, what's motivating you to post in such a way is a matter of self-indulgence, and unrestrained relish [>:] ).




Elisabella -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:29:14 PM)



quote:

ORIGINAL: goldenwyrm1968

I'm a breeder, and I work for my Children's survival. I don't use your resources.


You're cute and I like you because of that.

[sm=cute.gif]




kittinSol -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:31:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

And there's quite a bit more beyond the direct quotes but the gist is - revere that which is holy and destroy that which is sinful. "Judge not, lest ye be judged" is a command against hypocrisy, not a command for tolerance.



I'm not a Christian, but I did hear somewhere on the grapevine that Jesus' message was one of love and tolerance, not of self-righteous judgement against another person. Which is exactly what you know who has been doing.




goldenwyrm1968 -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:35:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella



quote:

ORIGINAL: goldenwyrm1968

I'm a breeder, and I work for my Children's survival. I don't use your resources.


You're cute and I like you because of that.

[sm=cute.gif]


Cute, Adorable..... Damn, I sound like an effing kitten. And according to some, an effing kitten with an effed up thought process.
Does that mean I get to grow up to be PsychoCat?




Elisabella -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:36:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol


quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

And there's quite a bit more beyond the direct quotes but the gist is - revere that which is holy and destroy that which is sinful. "Judge not, lest ye be judged" is a command against hypocrisy, not a command for tolerance.



I'm not a Christian, but I did hear somewhere on the grapevine that Jesus' message was one of love and tolerance, not of self-righteous judgement against another person. Which is exactly what you know who has been doing.


IMO it's a bit more complicated than that but this isn't the thread for it. We're already distracted enough by Hathead McSkanksalot as it is [;)]




belladevine -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:36:59 PM)


I do consider abortion a medical necessity.

What about a average woman that is over whelmed by caring for a stupid husbad and is already working three jobs.

STRESS KILLS people are dropping dead from heart attacks that are overwhelmed by debt and responsibilities and you want to add a baby to that????
they are also dropping dead when they jump out of windows because the stock market fell.

chances are that people who can not cope well with regular life stuff can not safely bring a child into this world.
people under stress often lash out at their children. child abuse is rampant.

too many children are brought into this world under the guise of LOVE. .... in fact it is not LOVE it is selfish sex..which has nothing to do with LOVE...sex is a bio-chemical function.




slvemike4u -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:37:20 PM)

That ship has sailed.....sorry .




Elisabella -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:38:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: goldenwyrm1968

Cute, Adorable..... Damn, I sound like an effing kitten. And according to some, an effing kitten with an effed up thought process.
Does that mean I get to grow up to be PsychoCat?



Yeah sorry about that, I figured I could get away with 'cute' but if I went for 'hot' my husband might take issue.

If you're using 'wyrm' as a synonym for 'drake' I'd stay stick with the reptilian [8D]




Lucylastic -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:42:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: came4U

quote:

Tell me... was it Jesus that told you to be so judgemental?


Jesus didn't have to whisper into my ear to reming me that if I was causing myself to consider having to 'kill/murder' a you know what because I was too stupid to realize that my eggs are running rampant like circus seals that I should stop fucking for a bit, till I get it sorted. But, like I said, sometimes some peeps physical problems don''t matter when they wanna fuck. Thus, these 'breeders' turn into killers that make the medical system go round and round with funding because they just can't stop to think 'hmm honey, maybe we shouldn't fuck until I know for sure that I am/one of us is barren'. If you don't want kids (married or single, broke or rich) sometimes you gotta stop doing the very thing that creates em. Do you need a map as to what that is??? or will she be back to contemplate abortion #8?

I love all the dumbass assumptions when you could have handled this quite calmly and asked me..... but then that would be reasonable and non dramatic, not something you are known for.
attack away, but i wont be party to it . I have interesting stuff to do




goldenwyrm1968 -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:53:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella


quote:

ORIGINAL: goldenwyrm1968

Cute, Adorable..... Damn, I sound like an effing kitten. And according to some, an effing kitten with an effed up thought process.
Does that mean I get to grow up to be PsychoCat?



Yeah sorry about that, I figured I could get away with 'cute' but if I went for 'hot' my husband might take issue.

If you're using 'wyrm' as a synonym for 'drake' I'd stay stick with the reptilian [8D]


I like the Drake/Dragon allusion, it works :D And thank you @};-




LadyAngelika -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 6:58:44 PM)

Responding might not be trying hard enough.

- LA




belladevine -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 7:01:14 PM)

By the way this came up earlier also and i want to add

Murder definetly is the number 1 cause of death to pregnant women (IN AMERICA).

Poorer countries do lose more women to medical complication but not here.

World wide statistics do change the ratio because there are very many people in very poor countries with inadequate health care, if any.





WyldHrt -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 7:06:31 PM)

quote:

I really don't care about the *reasons* why a woman gets pregnant or gets cancer, it's irrelevant to whether or not treatment is medically necessary, and making it into a moral issue completely overrides the real point which is: this is a healthcare bill, not a generalized social welfare bill.

Hi Elisa
You didn't answer the question I asked (perfectly understandable if you missed it, between the eye candy and the Skankinator [;)]).
If a pregnant woman chooses to have the baby, should prenatal care and birth costs be covered?




Elisabella -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 7:13:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WyldHrt

quote:

I really don't care about the *reasons* why a woman gets pregnant or gets cancer, it's irrelevant to whether or not treatment is medically necessary, and making it into a moral issue completely overrides the real point which is: this is a healthcare bill, not a generalized social welfare bill.

Hi Elisa
You didn't answer the question I asked (perfectly understandable if you missed it, between the eye candy and the Skankinator [;)]).
If a pregnant woman chooses to have the baby, should prenatal care and birth costs be covered?



Ah yes, sorry, I did miss it.

And yes I feel that medically necessary prenatal care and childbirth should be included, prenatal care is as essential as yearly checkups for children as far as preventative care goes, and childbirth should be covered both in hospital and at home with a certified midwife.




WyldHrt -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 7:23:04 PM)

OK, but here's the thing. Pregnancy is a medical condition. All pregnancies end, be it by birth, miscarriage, or abortion. The end of a pregnancy, no matter which of the 3, requires medical care. How can you support 2 of those being covered and the other not being covered, especially when the cost of the excluded procedure to the system is a small fraction of the cost of a covered one?

Isn't it kind of like being brought to the hospital with a badly broken leg (medical condition), and being told, "Now, we can perform surgery and try to save the leg, but the procedure has significant risks and may kill you; or we can amputate, which is a very safe procedure. Oh, by the way, the surgery is covered by healthcare, but if you choose amputation, pay for it yourself"?

ETA- Clarification




slvemike4u -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 7:31:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WyldHrt

OK, but here's the thing. Pregnancy is a medical condition. All pregnancies end, be it by birth, miscarriage, or abortion. How can you support 2 of those being covered and the other not being covered, especially when the cost of the excluded procedure to the system is a small fraction of the cost of a covered one?

Isn't it kind of like being brought to the hospital with a badly broken leg (medical condition), and being told, "Now, we can perform surgery and try to save the leg, but the procedure has significant risks and may kill you; or we can amputate, which is a very safe procedure. Oh, by the way, the surgery is covered by healthcare, but if you choose amputation, you're on your own"?

Saw this one coming ...the question and the response(which was also predictable) had only one natural conclusion.




ShaharThorne -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 7:33:49 PM)

Wyld, that is Medicaid here in Texas if the mother chooses to pursue it.  I only got Medicaid after Lizard was 6 months old and was reaching the crawling stage when I realised that I cannot pay for childcare and maintain a job.  




WyldHrt -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 7:35:32 PM)

It's the difference between medical necessity and elective. Once a woman is pregnant, medical attention is a necessity, regardless of her choice.
ETA- that was to Mike




LadyAngelika -> RE: Women's Rights! (3/19/2010 7:37:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: WyldHrt

OK, but here's the thing. Pregnancy is a medical condition. All pregnancies end, be it by birth, miscarriage, or abortion. How can you support 2 of those being covered and the other not being covered, especially when the cost of the excluded procedure to the system is a small fraction of the cost of a covered one?

Isn't it kind of like being brought to the hospital with a badly broken leg (medical condition), and being told, "Now, we can perform surgery and try to save the leg, but the procedure has significant risks and may kill you; or we can amputate, which is a very safe procedure. Oh, by the way, the surgery is covered by healthcare, but if you choose amputation, you're on your own"?

Saw this one coming ...the question and the response(which was also predictable) had only one natural conclusion.


This is why we call her smaht kewkie.

- LA




Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875