RE: TOS

RE: TOS (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

LafayetteLady -> RE: TOS (3/26/2010 9:27:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RCdc This is RC Woman, Jesus is coming. Don't bother looking busy with this shit. Just open up and say ah. [image]http://www.yugobernie.com/images/Humor/buddy%20christ.jpg[/image] DarlingSavage, I agree that you are funny and witty and the pictures have been cute. But as LadyPact pointed out, they really never added anything to the conversation. None of it has slowed anything down for me. What I do take issue with, however, is that I agree with LadyPact saying it should be one standard for all. Mod21 stated quote: ORIGINAL: ModTwentyOne Since you seem to be unable to determine what is appropriate and what is not, we can certainly make a special rule just for you that says you are not allowed to post animated objects of any kind, and still objects no larger than two inches wide by three inches high. ModeratorTwentyOne yet the above picture was not edited down. Perhaps that is a "special rule" just for DS, but there is often different rules for different folks. I know I personally have been guilty of posting what turned out to be an enormous picture on a thread of mine when my cat was out whoring around. I also admit that I have no idea how to make it smaller, so it wasn't intentional. I would just like to see that things are applied evenly to everyone, without any special treatment to some for any reason. Wrong for one is wrong for all.

ModTwentyOne -> RE: TOS (3/26/2010 9:30:32 PM)
I did say the special rule was just for her.

VideoAdminAlpha -> RE: TOS (3/26/2010 9:31:02 PM)
Throwing in my 2 cents, you neglected to mention that the first post that you are so upset was removed where you told the other users they unfortunately wouldn't be able to see your "funnies" any more had a HUGE jpeg that filled up the whole screen also(even more than the Jesus in other posts on this thread). That was the reason it was pulled, not the verbiage. Edited to say to LafayetteLady: the only reason she has the special rule, to clarify what 21 said, is because she said guidelines were lacking. Since she seemingly had a hard time with the non specifics, 21 gave her some for the future so she would not have the same problem again.

Phoenixpower -> RE: TOS (3/26/2010 9:37:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ModTwentyOne Just so we are clear here... we did not respond to you as quickly as you wished, so you started yet another thread about the problems your actions were causing to vast numbers of users on the site. Is that really your defense on taking this to the forums? Gosh some people have too much time on their hands...would love to have so much time to investigate such peanuts as from the OP on here... as someone else said its their sand box and they can pull whatever they want just as you can return any mail to sender if you wish to do so at home...get over it. I know one incident where my post was pulled and it was in my view for no reason (though of course whoever did pull it will see that differently) and I was never informed about it why...however I let it be as after all, believe it or not, it is not the end of the world [8\|]

Lockit -> RE: TOS (3/26/2010 9:45:57 PM)
I cannot believe this thread. I've been here a number of years and have seen lots, but this I cannot believe. Here we have a free site, with moderators that give up their time and energy to try and help a free site become all it can be and we gotta bitch about some pictures and why they can't be and demand an accounting for actions taken or things said? Now, I have heard some anal play before, but this takes the... er... um... cake! Can't we get back to talking about kinky sex and who's doin who and what drama is going on channel politic's or polls or even mistress?

VideoAdminAlpha -> RE: TOS (3/26/2010 9:50:15 PM)
It can pull down the speed of anyone doing a search that might involve that particular post, to anywhere that the whole thread or post might be displayed in a list of topics, any thing that might involve anything that requires the server to look search that thread and wind up on that topic, multiplied by the users that might be on that thread, or even looking at that whole category (off topic, general bdsm etc) or doing searches at the same time etc. Then multiply that by the fact another user might be in another area whose functional capability has possibly been slowed in response to the others areas being slowed, and you can see what can happen. It was not to this degree of seriousness at this point, but if continued unchecked it could possibly cause a bigger problem than what was happening.

Phoenixpower -> RE: TOS (3/26/2010 9:51:51 PM)
I still think we should get a thread sections with a title a la "threads we don't need" where those whining threads can join the how to detect fake threads etc...which often end up in the polls and random which isnt quite fair to pull that section down with such low crap...

WyldHrt -> RE: TOS (3/26/2010 10:10:37 PM)
quote: which often end up in the polls and random which isnt quite fair to pull that section down with such low crap... gigglesnorts I completely agree with you, Phoenix; but the idea of "low crap" pulling down a forum called "Polls and Random Stupidity"... sorry, I had to laugh. [:D] To the OP- The mods here are volunteers, who donate their free time to help keep this site running smoothly for all users. Posting three different threads here because you think they didn't respond to your email quickly enough or explain their actions to your personal satisfaction is just childish. Please locate the nearest pair of big girl panties you can find, put them on, and deal. Sheesh

Phoenixpower -> RE: TOS (3/26/2010 10:15:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WyldHrt quote: which often end up in the polls and random which isnt quite fair to pull that section down with such low crap... gigglesnorts I completely agree with you, Phoenix; but the idea of "low crap" pulling down a forum called "Polls and Random Stupidity"... sorry, I had to laugh. [:D] yeah but we still keep our random stupidity on a high level...or at least the majority of it...and not on the low level of such whining threads about pulled threads or fakes and scammer whining...it just feels at times as being the handy bin for the mods for every such crap which isn't really appropriate IMO.

Level -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 2:42:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact quote: ORIGINAL: Level LP, I don't see how one has anything to do with the other. Commenting on pics on the forum in general, Level. Shouldn't pictures of other people have one standard or none at all? We have members here (which is their right) who don't want their face on a BDSM site. Don't other people get that same consideration here when they aren't a member? LP, the difference in the two is that those members, by virtue of being members, are "announcing" that they're into BDSM; the celeb pics, silly pics, etc, are posted either for informational purposes, or attempts at humor, not to try to say that their subjects are into kink, and I don't think anyone would confuse the two. quote: Panda: And type slowly. In case the server is being bogged down by pictures of Level's package. Ahhh, that's why I get an influx of mail every time the site crashes [8D]

sirsholly -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 3:22:53 AM)
quote: Then multiply that huh? MATH??? Now we have to do math here? Well damn if that doesn't haul off and suck. K....16 goes into 21 how many times.....?

Level -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 3:26:57 AM)
No math! None! Nyet!

yourdarkdesire -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 3:35:00 AM)
Level - I'm thinking that you need to cmail me any and all photos of your package before posting them on this or any other website - someone needs to assure that the photos are fit for consumption and I humbly sacrifice my time to provide this service [:D]

sirsholly -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 3:40:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: yourdarkdesire Level - I'm thinking that you need to cmail me any and all photos of your package before posting them on this or any other website - someone needs to assure that the photos are fit for consumption and I humbly sacrifice my time to provide this service [:D] lemme know what you think of his "cock" shot, YDD. snickersnort

Level -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 3:43:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: yourdarkdesire Level - I'm thinking that you need to cmail me any and all photos of your package before posting them on this or any other website - someone needs to assure that the photos are fit for consumption and I humbly sacrifice my time to provide this service [:D] *You are beautiful and* selfless; I always suspected as much, ydd. [:D]**

yourdarkdesire -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 3:46:14 AM)
I know Level dahling ... I know now - where's the mail

Level -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 3:47:00 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: sirsholly quote: ORIGINAL: yourdarkdesire Level - I'm thinking that you need to cmail me any and all photos of your package before posting them on this or any other website - someone needs to assure that the photos are fit for consumption and I humbly sacrifice my time to provide this service [:D] lemme know what you think of his "cock" shot, YDD. snickersnort No snickering, and mentioning my giant cock in the same post [>:]

myotherself -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 3:50:14 AM)
is it wrong to mention that maths gets me hot? [8\|]

yourdarkdesire -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 3:55:30 AM)
15 * 22 / 78 + 1267 - 21 =??

sirsholly -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 3:56:33 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Level quote: ORIGINAL: sirsholly quote: ORIGINAL: yourdarkdesire Level - I'm thinking that you need to cmail me any and all photos of your package before posting them on this or any other website - someone needs to assure that the photos are fit for consumption and I humbly sacrifice my time to provide this service [:D] lemme know what you think of his "cock" shot, YDD. snickersnort No snickering, and mentioning my giant cock in the same post [>:] MUST I again tell you the vast difference between a "snicker" and a "snickersnort"?

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875