RE: TOS (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


sirsholly -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 5:05:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly

MATH???

Now we have to do math here?

Well damn if that doesn't haul off and suck.

K....16 goes into 21 how many times.....?



As many times as I tell it to.  I'm a Dom.

It?

Right over yer head there Stevie.




DarkSteven -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 5:08:09 AM)

/Explains to holly/

If I tell 16 to go into 21 five time, it will, because I'm so Domly.  I never let numbers push me around.




VaguelyCurious -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 5:09:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

/Explains to holly/

If I tell 16 to go into 21 five time, it will, because I'm so Domly.  I never let numbers push me around.



Tell me: did you used to work for Enron?




sirsholly -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 5:10:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

/Explains to holly/

If I tell 16 to go into 21 five time, it will, because I'm so Domly.  I never let numbers push me around.

/pushes Stevie around/


<<<not a number




sirsholly -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 5:11:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

/Explains to holly/

If I tell 16 to go into 21 five time, it will, because I'm so Domly.  I never let numbers push me around.



Tell me: did you used to work for Enron?

pass the paper towels, please




DarkSteven -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 5:13:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

/Explains to holly/

If I tell 16 to go into 21 five time, it will, because I'm so Domly.  I never let numbers push me around.

/pushes Stevie around/

<<<not a number


Funny, holly, I've always though of you as a fairly irrational number...




sirsholly -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 5:14:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

/Explains to holly/

If I tell 16 to go into 21 five time, it will, because I'm so Domly.  I never let numbers push me around.

/pushes Stevie around/

<<<not a number


Funny, holly, I've always though of you as a fairly irrational number...

speaketh the square root




zephyroftheNorth -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 5:19:21 AM)

quote:

Now, before I go, one more of my massive cock for zephy, 'cause she neither snickered, nor snorted (not to mention that offshoot snortasnickerin thang).


Ohhhh Level, it's just....I...ummm....I.....

::::::THUD::::::

Thank you




Aneirin -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 5:46:55 AM)

The only thing I find irritating when being referred to TOS, is like, where, show me where, as does it never occur that though something may be written down it is not always plain to see for all. I tend when reading instructions to take the literal understanding, but I know there are good writers and not so good writers, how something is explained in writing might not be accurate, so I try to try and read between the lines, to get a general understanding which works for me. As to if that is what was meant, I don't really know. I would prefer if when being scolded for apparently breaching TOS, to be told exactly where, and how, so that I may understand for the future, otherwise it just becomes more confusion.




DarkSteven -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 5:53:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

The only thing I find irritating when being referred to TOS, is like, where, show me where, as does it never occur that though something may be written down it is not always plain to see for all. I tend when reading instructions to take the literal understanding, but I know there are good writers and not so good writers, how something is explained in writing might not be accurate, so I try to try and read between the lines, to get a general understanding which works for me. As to if that is what was meant, I don't really know. I would prefer if when being scolded for apparently breaching TOS, to be told exactly where, and how, so that I may understand for the future, otherwise it just becomes more confusion.


When the mods reference the TOS without referring to the exact passage, they're using their own time efficiently.

Personally, I don't understand why everyone cares so much about the literal words in the TOS.  The TOS are not black and white rules, but are interpreted by the mods.  And even if something was not in the TOS but the mods determined that it damaged the site or other users' experience, I would want them to come forth and ask the offender to stop.




RCdc -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 6:03:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

The only thing I find irritating when being referred to TOS, is like, where, show me where, as does it never occur that though something may be written down it is not always plain to see for all. I tend when reading instructions to take the literal understanding, but I know there are good writers and not so good writers, how something is explained in writing might not be accurate, so I try to try and read between the lines, to get a general understanding which works for me. As to if that is what was meant, I don't really know. I would prefer if when being scolded for apparently breaching TOS, to be told exactly where, and how, so that I may understand for the future, otherwise it just becomes more confusion.


So you sign up to things that you don't understand?  How does that work?
I know that people sign on the dotted line on many things every day that they don't 'understand' and end up in shit.  But that is their own fault.  Not the fault of anyone else.  So they need to deal with that.

the.dark.




Jeffff -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 6:04:13 AM)

If you get a message with one of those breathtaking gold boarders?.... you can safely assume you have violated TOS.

The way I see it, they would probably just rather leave ya alone. If they go through the trouble, I generally just comply...... more or less.... for the time being....










chicagosub4u -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 6:08:33 AM)

you shouldn't tease a girl with big cock photos...you cannot imagine my disappointment when i launched the link...sighs




Jeffff -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 6:09:36 AM)

You are just insatiable aren't you!




chicagosub4u -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 6:12:20 AM)

What can i say? i like big cocks :) it's a personal preference




Jeffff -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 6:17:10 AM)

Enjoy the c-mail you are about to receive.....:)




chicagosub4u -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 6:19:52 AM)

When you say c-mail do you mean "cock mail"?




Level -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 6:23:52 AM)

quote:

holly:

is the list a good thang or a not so good thang?


The one you two are on is a good one.




sirsholly -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 6:29:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

quote:

holly:

is the list a good thang or a not so good thang?


The one you two are on is a good one.
Awwwww.....You like us!! You REALLY like us!!!!!




Jeffff -> RE: TOS (3/27/2010 6:30:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: chicagosub4u

When you say c-mail do you mean "cock mail"?



Let Me just say.... there is no need to forward any pictures to Me.....:)




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875