RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant

RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Elisabella -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/26/2010 9:59:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subtee And if that were the case and he was to say it, how do you think it would go over? Okay honestly if it's your wet dream that Obama is a closeted dominant I'm really not going to take that away from you. All I know is that publicly he said his wife trained him, which is not something I could imagine any dominant I know saying. And I still don't think the Presidency has anything to do with BDSM

subtee -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/26/2010 10:02:50 PM)
I implied it was my "wet dream?" I thought it was a reasonable discourse. Ima go to bed. Cheers and happy weekend, folks!

Kirata -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/26/2010 10:03:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subtee HCR was a complete clusterfuck and he still got it passed, not as he would have liked it to be, but it was counted down and out--unpassable-- and he did it. Moving this picture into a Dom/sub frame, with apologies for the non-gender neutral language, he couldn't get her to do what he wanted, but at least he got her to do something else? K.

slvemike4u -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/26/2010 10:04:37 PM)
Well before you go to bed allow me to reinsate my -clink-.....goodnight sweetie..sweet dreams.

Elisabella -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/26/2010 10:09:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subtee I implied it was my "wet dream?" I thought it was a reasonable discourse. Ima go to bed. Cheers and happy weekend, folks! Well you just seem reeeeeeeeeally bent on making it go one way. In fact I wonder if Mike has a point and that you don't want to accept his submissive quotes at face value because it would make you respect him less as President.

Brain -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/26/2010 10:16:56 PM)
He does it because Republicans are liars as well as selfish. All Repugs did with healthcare is lie and scare people to stop much needed reforms.

Sanity -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/26/2010 10:18:01 PM)
Who pulled your string? quote: ORIGINAL: Brain He does it because Republicans are liars as well as selfish. All Repugs did with healthcare is lie and scare people to stop much needed reforms.

Brain -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/26/2010 10:26:05 PM)
If your talking about marriage he respects his wife but it would be a reach to think it means he's a submissive.

slvemike4u -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/26/2010 10:29:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Elisabella quote: ORIGINAL: subtee I implied it was my "wet dream?" I thought it was a reasonable discourse. Ima go to bed. Cheers and happy weekend, folks! Well you just seem reeeeeeeeeally bent on making it go one way. In fact I wonder if Mike has a point and that you don't want to accept his submissive quotes at face value because it would make you respect him less as President. After some 7200 posts I might actually have had a point? Hot damm but I'm good [:D]

Kirata -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/26/2010 10:40:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Brain He does it because Republicans are liars as well as selfish. I see. So then you disagree with subtee that he is self-assured and doing what he believes in. If the Republicans weren't such selfish liars, he wouldn't be doing it. Well that's certainly an interesting point of view. [:D] K.

popeye1250 -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/27/2010 12:17:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subtee Don't you find Obama's stance on what he wants to accomplish dominant in nature? It seems to me he says what he means, and then does it. He was willing to face the wrath (in it's many incarnations, at this point, from ridiculous to violent) for what he wanted to do. He didn't lie (like W and the obfuscation created to engage in preventive war) to gain his objectives. He went ahead with HCR saying voters can boot him if they want but he believes in what he's doing. His recent stance with regard to dissatisfaction and calls for repeal is, "bring it on." He does and says things that are attacked daily (knowing they will be). He doesn't shirk from them. He's not a reed in the wind, he's self assured. Whether you agree with what he says and does, it is rather Dominant, no? Subtee, to ex-military guys like me, guys that didn't serve can never be alphas. As much as I disliked him, John Kerry is an alpha. Obama, Clinton, not alphas. Guys like Obama and Clinton look "up" to guys like Kerry and me.

NorthernGent -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/27/2010 4:18:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subtee Don't you find Obama's stance on what he wants to accomplish dominant in nature? It seems to me he says what he means, and then does it. He was willing to face the wrath (in it's many incarnations, at this point, from ridiculous to violent) for what he wanted to do. Whether you agree with what he says and does, it is rather Dominant, no? There's no connection really. Most people have a vision and will take action to achieve it. That's merely the norm. As someone in a position of power and with a certain amount of good will at this stage of his leadership - he has the means to execute his plans. And you have no idea what means he and his advisors employ to get their way - the veiled threats etc to people within his own party - that's politics. Work is very different to home life. There are all sorts of threats/cliques/gang mentality going on behind the scenes in order to step over the next man. He could be dominant or domineering depending upon behaviour/information to which you're not privy.

NorthernGent -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/27/2010 4:21:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda I would say no, because he's too concerned about what other people think of him. He's nowhere near as bold as he talks, and that's not a quality I respect or trust in a dominant. That's a big part of his job mate. As the leader of 300 million people - and the leader of a competitive environment such as the equivalent of the houses of parliament that you have over there - he better take the time to understand how he is viewed in order to ward off predators. He's not in the sort of situation where he can dicate the rules and everyone will play by them providing he does his bit - it ain't BDSM in there - there will be a whole raft of people behind the scenes - including people in his own party - who will attempt to discredit him regardless of his actions. That's politics - it ain't the most ethical of stomping grounds.

Elisabella -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/27/2010 5:53:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u After some 7200 posts I might actually have had a point? Hot damm but I'm good [:D] Heheheee You've actually made some good points before...they just happened to be things I disagreed with [8D]

LaTigresse -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/27/2010 6:55:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 quote: ORIGINAL: subtee Don't you find Obama's stance on what he wants to accomplish dominant in nature? It seems to me he says what he means, and then does it. He was willing to face the wrath (in it's many incarnations, at this point, from ridiculous to violent) for what he wanted to do. He didn't lie (like W and the obfuscation created to engage in preventive war) to gain his objectives. He went ahead with HCR saying voters can boot him if they want but he believes in what he's doing. His recent stance with regard to dissatisfaction and calls for repeal is, "bring it on." He does and says things that are attacked daily (knowing they will be). He doesn't shirk from them. He's not a reed in the wind, he's self assured. Whether you agree with what he says and does, it is rather Dominant, no? Subtee, to ex-military guys like me, guys that didn't serve can never be alphas. As much as I disliked him, John Kerry is an alpha. Obama, Clinton, not alphas. Guys like Obama and Clinton look "up" to guys like Kerry and me. Okay, I sure as hell don't look at someone doing their job as either dominant or submissive in the context we think of the terms..........but to say that guys that didn't serve cannot be alphas and that those that did not serve automatically 'look up to' those that did...........is such a crock of shit. Keep dreaming there Pop.

zephyroftheNorth -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/27/2010 7:02:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl LOL... love ya subtee! no one knew how to vacation like Bush! Indeed! Wasn't going on vacation the first thing he did after being elected?

zephyroftheNorth -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/27/2010 7:22:29 AM)
quote: ETA I will say that there seems to be a lot of men who work in high powered, high stress jobs who are very submissive at home, so I can see where you're coming from. I see it more as those women running the household so that their men don't have to deal with it when they're home. I suspect the comment about Michelle having him trained wasn't literal.

brainiacsub -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/27/2010 8:47:18 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 [...] Subtee, to ex-military guys like me, guys that didn't serve can never be alphas. As much as I disliked him, John Kerry is an alpha. Obama, Clinton, not alphas. Guys like Obama and Clinton look "up" to guys like Kerry and me. Good God, man...are you on crack? I am ex Military too, (25th ID, 25th Avn Brg) and I'd hardly classify those who choose military service as 'dominant.' In fact, I think it's just the opposite. Among the enlisted, those who join the military tend to be pretty 'mediocre' in life. Not the best students, fuckups in school, little ambition and drive toward building a civilian career and for many it's either the military or dead end jobs or jail. It can be a great jumping off point in life for those who are self motivated, but those who are not tend to stay in for life. Those who are truly leaders and possess conviction for the cause (like Pat Tillman) are the exception, not the rule. Among the officer ranks it's a bit different, but I still wouldn't call the majority of these men 'dominant." I support the military and am generally a defense hawk, but you have confused being 'dominant' with being a soldier.

Jeffff -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/27/2010 9:33:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: brainiacsub Good God, man...are you on crack? Pretty much seems that way...:)

domiguy -> RE: As a Dominant or one who is interested in a Dominant (3/27/2010 9:36:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: brainiacsub Good God, man...are you on crack? See, she is already less nerdy. What a fucking cunt of a gal!

Page: << < prev 3 4 [5] 6 7 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875