RE: Nomenclature ?

RE: Nomenclature ? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

tazzygirl -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 8:52:25 PM)
lol.. and thats all you can say... bullshit.. or liar. yet proof was given to you. can you prove otherwise?

domiguy -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 8:53:42 PM)
As a lefty you really hope that the tea baggers carry on as they are!!! Just like some Democrats failed to realize that Hillary was a polarizing factor and probably unelectable. the tea baggers are making a huge mistake by aligning themselves with the likes of Palin. Possibly the dumbest person in all of politics. Goes to show about the utter stupidity of this "movement" and the group of people, "conservatives", that think they are actually achieving something.

Sanity -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 8:53:44 PM)
Someone linked to a leftist whose web page had the same lie. Thats proof? quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl lol.. and thats all you can say... bullshit.. or liar. yet proof was given to you. can you prove otherwise?

tazzygirl -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 8:54:18 PM)
As i said... where is your proof to the contrary?

thornhappy -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 8:55:11 PM)
Jesus Christ, Sanity. Fox News plays all day where I work. I saw the scroll and labels with my own eyes. They were referred to as teabaggers. And it wasn't a "Oh my god, they are calling us evil teabaggers!!" story. quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Bull shit. quote: ORIGINAL: thornhappy When the movement started, even Fox News referred to them as teabaggers. The members of the movement referred to themselves as teabaggers. When the snickering started, they changed to tea partiers.

domiguy -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 8:55:24 PM)
Who cares? these are a group of idiots. Silly tea baggers.

Sanity -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 9:00:48 PM)
Well first of all, its your lie, so its on you to prove that this bs that you're making up is real. Second and more importantly, why not just strive to raise the level of discourse here. We can easily sink to that level if we must, but I prefer we don't. quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl As i said... where is your proof to the contrary?

tazzygirl -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 9:11:32 PM)
Because you keep dragging it back to that level when you dont have any other recourse to win an argument. Its not on me to say yes or no. Its on the one accusing others of lying after they produce their proof. Yet you cant win this argument. And you know this. What kills you is the rest of us know this too.

tazzygirl -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 9:16:39 PM)
Think maybe this may have something to do with it? [image]local://upfiles/502828/C78664CD07A84FA3ADEC8AFE7B8BD10C.jpg[/image]

Musicmystery -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 9:18:16 PM)
So much for a nonpartisan movement.

tazzygirl -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 9:19:55 PM)
So much for them not understanding the meaning as well.

Jeffff -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 9:29:55 PM)
Slut = A woman who will fuck anyone Bitch = A Woman who will fuck anyome but Me

thornhappy -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 9:32:05 PM)
No, no Jefff. It usually is: Lesbian: A woman who will fuck anyone but me [:D]

brainiacsub -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 9:36:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Bull shit. quote: ORIGINAL: thornhappy When the movement started, even Fox News referred to them as teabaggers. The members of the movement referred to themselves as teabaggers. When the snickering started, they changed to tea partiers. Thomas, it is true. I wish I had "proof" but I can tell you as someone who was watching the news extensively during that time period, it was Jon Stewart of The Daily Show who first started playing clips of all the cable news shows calling these people "Tea Baggers." It was also Jon who informed the general public as to the true definition of "tea bagging" thus exposing the joke. I bet you could find some You Tube videos of that show. It was quite funny.

domiguy -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 9:54:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: brainiacsub Thomas, it is true. Wow. It's actually happening.

brainiacsub -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 9:58:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: domiguy quote: ORIGINAL: brainiacsub Thomas, it is true. Wow. It's actually happening. What?

Jeffff -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 10:10:02 PM)
The love match! Call Him Tommy, I hear he likes that!

brainiacsub -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 10:12:32 PM)
Speaking from experience, are we? I didn't think you swung that way.

Jeffff -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 10:15:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: brainiacsub Speaking from experience, are we? I didn't think you swung that way. It's the word on the street. And I AM sooooo shreet! Yo! Edited to add, "Yo"

domiguy -> RE: Nomenclature ? (3/28/2010 10:17:02 PM)
You get those conservatives away from their peers and they are a very trippy, kinky and cock loving group of folk. Jefffy, Tommy and Dommy all rolling around the floor taking turns to see who will be the next tea bagger. It was hot.

Page: << < prev 3 4 [5] 6 7 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875