Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: brainiacsub Merc, I am assuming you addressed this question to me specifically, correct? This is a good one. No - It wasn't directed to anyone; however thank you for your response. In my opinion you have not, and are NOT representing yourself as a "dumb ass"! (Edited, because I didn't like the way the first attempt read.) quote:
ORIGINAL: Politesub53 When doing it selectively must be the more hypocritical. At least the first instance is even handed. Polite, I apologize for being dense or else something must be lost in translation - I am having trouble understanding the meaning of those two sentences in response to my first question. If you wouldn't mind try again - THANKS! quote:
To answer the second, this crime, if you can call fortune telling a crime, didnt take place inside Saudi Arabia. If it had of, you may have had a point. I don't - the Saudi government and people do. Anyone going there shouldn't plead ignorance as a defense. What crimes in the UK are ignored, or dropped, for similar reasoning from the accused, or is it the penalty that determines the acceptance of 'local' standards? I'm not attempting to make a point. I think the Saudi Government will be making one whatever ultimately happens. Whether heads being chopped off or the harvesting of cocoa beans making children's hands bleed - having opinions is within the nature of man. When does a 'one true way' (Western or any other perspective) get enforced by guns and blood? Of course that question assumes that the 'West' has an agreed upon consensus. The very thought of one, to me, points to the theoretical, and purely academical, nature of the entire debate. 2nd Edit quote:
ORIGINAL: Politesub53 It is the Saudi authorities that tried and convicted him. Tourist or Pilgrim I fail to see the distinction. As I said to merc, the so called crime took place outside Saudi, not inside. Polite, in many places throughout the world, you have to be aware and adapt to local laws or be prepared to accept the consequences. Whether true or not in this case that the 'crime' took place outside Saudi Arabia, as a tourist, 'pilgrim', the expectation of 'exceptional treatment' is foolish. Anywhere we travel we make sure we're fully aware of the local laws and either follow them or assume to live with the consequence of disobeying; granted none as draconian as in this case.
< Message edited by Mercnbeth -- 4/2/2010 12:53:27 PM >
|