LaTigresse
Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: xBullx It's always been my understanding that being an Independent means just that, not having some platform that was common to a group. It is where the independent thinkers reside. So I suspect there are a good number of Socially Conservative Independents that love spending their ass off. Independent is little more than being independent of party affiliation, to imply otherwise suggests an agenda all to its own. Vote for the Nopartybaggers, aye? Ideologues? You do realize that's the reason for parties and platforms, right? It affords voters with the information needed to make choices and thereby hold their officials accountable through stated positions. Its been suggested that the independent candidate can easily alter his position, change his moral code and be held to only limited concepts of political accountability. Without philosophical perspective man is little more than a chimp reacting impetuously time and again with no expectations of consistancy. If I am reading this correctly, and perhaps I am not, but it seems that you suggest a person that does not belong to a party is weak and not consistent. When no one party/group reflects MY morality I cannot support any one party. It would go against my morals to give a group my blanket support. I cannot believe that there are not others like myself, that prefer to determine the merit of individuals rather than a group.
_____________________________
My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one! Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!
|