Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick!


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 9:35:01 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Isnt Manning holding a trial... Columbia... to prove Obama isnt entitled to be President? Your words, i do believe.


Tazzy, Obama on paper went to Columbia.(not in real life)  It is all a lie.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 9:36:45 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WantingToServe11

I'm sorry if this sounds bad, and  I know this is a pit off topic but that women is ugly has hell. 
And in my oh so humble opinion this single fact will impact in a highly negative manner her ability to do the job should she be nominated and confirmed.
I'm with wanting on this one....ugly old men are okay,but no ugly old woman...no way no how.



_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to WantingToServe11)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 9:37:20 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		Thats not what i asked you, pahunk. Is Manning, or is he not, holding a sedition and treason trial in May?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 9:39:17 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline 		Shit tazzy,one would assume if Obama nominates him....Manning might just cancel the proceedings.Yanno you scratch my back,I scratch yours kind of thing

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 9:43:59 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		Pft. He tried that with the republicans.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 9:54:37 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline 		Yeah but damm it they are ,as you said "Republicans"....everyone knows they are not to be trusted.Manning on the other hand seems like a fine upstanding citizen....he must be if he is in the conversation for a SCOTUS nomination.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 9:54:46 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Thats not what i asked you, pahunk. Is Manning, or is he not, holding a sedition and treason trial in May?


Yes he is.   May 14-19.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 9:58:44 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline 		On the serious side of things....what are the odds Obama picks a fight with this selection.We know just to keep the present balance his pick will lean left,but does he take a chance of a protracted confirmation hearing and go real left ...or does he play nice with the Repubs and choose a safer and more easily confirmed nominee?
By the way I found it real interesting to read that Stevens was confirmed a scant 19 days after being put forth by Ford(a President who didn't even have the stature of an election under his belt!).These sure are different times,aren't they?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 9:58:56 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		Is he qualifies to be a Judge?

Is he qualified to be a prosecuter?

Is he qualified to be those things and jury too?

The answer to those questions is a resounding NO!

Constitutionally, this trial is a farce, with no standing in any court of law. He could find himself facing defamation charges, maybe even slander charges. for crying out loud.. the trial is being held within a church!

pahunk, you really need to come back to the land of reality. If Manning is qualified to run such a trial, then of course he is qualified to lead the SC.

think about it.

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 4/10/2010 10:03:34 AM >

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 10:04:58 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		Thank YOU tazzy

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 10:07:07 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		Are yous defending Obamas policies?

because if you are-- that perplexes me.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 10:18:13 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		Obama isnt  liberal enough for me Hunky, but then Manning isnt capable of running a brothel, let alone a trial for the POTUS

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 10:25:52 AM   
brainiacsub


Posts: 1209
Joined: 11/11/2007
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

Hmmmm... HuffPost insists repeatedly she isn't ideological....

Others take a different view

http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/05/elena_kagan_radical.asp



Rich, the Weekly Standard is a Conservative magazine. Even if she is a moderate centrist, that is considered radical by Bill Kristol's standards. If you want people to believe that she is in fact a left wing ideologue, you'll have to provide more credible sources than this.

I'm not saying she isn't a leftie, I'm just saying coming from a rightie it's not very credible.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 11:05:16 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		Yeah Lucy,

Spread the trial around.

(in reply to brainiacsub)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 11:15:28 AM   
belladevine


Posts: 437
Joined: 10/23/2007
Status: offline
This article by Mr goldfarb is disturbing to me. He is a blogger. He suggests that she is a socialist.

This article is about a highly educated woman. In the article she says their is much fueding between the standard 2 party system dem vs rep.

Does this mean that she is a socialist?

I do not believe that a person that wants to disolve fueding at parties can be bad. People are social animals. People really need to learn to get along.

Learn to think or just have another drink. I think Elena Kagan thinks.






(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 11:48:45 AM   
NefertariReborn


Posts: 381
Status: offline 		My money is on Koh.  Add a little asian flavour to the court. 

_____________________________

“Security is mostly a superstition…Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure or it is nothing at all.” -Helen Keller

“How will you become a clear mirror if you resent being polished

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 11:52:59 AM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: brainiacsub

Rich, the Weekly Standard is a Conservative magazine.



Well, duh, Brainia. And what exactly is HuffPost???



_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to brainiacsub)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 12:03:33 PM   
brainiacsub


Posts: 1209
Joined: 11/11/2007
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline 		You missed the point, Rich. Why would you let any one partisan source frame your opinion about her? The truth lies somewhere in the consensus. It's not that hard to find if you really want to.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 12:08:29 PM   
intenze


Posts: 2176
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WantingToServe11

I'm sorry if this sounds bad, and  I know this is a pit off topic but that women is ugly has hell. 

Bet she has good grammar though. Seriously, who cares what they look like? Find me an attractive Supreme Court Judge and stop being so stupidly shallow.

_____________________________

Namaste, bitches!

(in reply to WantingToServe11)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! - 4/10/2010 12:13:48 PM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline 		What's the point of even going to Harvard if you can't eventually be nominated for the Supreme Court?


I remain disappointed


Harvard Class of 1980


_____________________________

"If you don't live it, it won't come out your horn." Charlie Parker

(in reply to intenze)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: FUCK! Why Harvard? Supreme CT pick! Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094