quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I am not a scumbag fucking attorney doesnt mean that I dont kick th eshit out of them in court. <<<< didnt you say that right above me?



So, you havent the attention span of a gopher.....fine.

do cite us a case wherein you kicked the shit out of an attorney in court. we should be able to find it online, and a newspaper accounting of it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

More on the capitalization issue...I dug into my old papers and came across an old document...an issue between myself and none other than the Crown (in the person of Queen Bessie II), and guess what...neither her name nor mine are capitalised. I would have thought that in a case involving the Crown (which is the ultimate conspirator behind all these shennanigans...oh wait that's the Pope isn't it...so sorry) would be certain to employ the ALL CAPS ruse, but apparently not. In fact the only legal document I can find in my admittedly patchy files that lists my name in caps is a subpoena to appear as a witness...go figure.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

They cannot be removed from the public record they are caselaw.

http://courts.michigan.gov/scao/resources/publications/manuals/carg/rg_sec8.pdf 
http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/michigan/michigan-state-court-records

or perhaps your cases were not tried here on  earth?  some other state perhaps?

quote:

ORIGINAL: SaintIntensity

shit like this makes me giggle - did someone listen to Team Chucklehead? NONE of his "escape clauses" have EVER succeeded in a US court. He is spouting BS - and knows its BS - its for entertainment purposes, not educational - as learning lots of untrue things scarcely counts as "education".

e.g.

"Eddie Ray Kahn has been described by the Los Angeles Times as a "veteran tax protester".[1] Kahn served time in prison for tax crimes from 1985 to 1987.[2] Kahn founded the group American Rights Litigators and ran the for-profit businesses "Guiding Light of God Ministries" and "Eddie Kahn and Associates." According to the U.S. Justice Department, all three organizations are or were illegal tax evasion operations.[3]
On October 12, 2006, Kahn was charged, with actor Wesley Snipes and Douglas P. Rosile,[4] with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States under 18 U.S.C. § 371,[5] and one count of making or aiding and abetting the making of a false and fraudulent claim for payment against the United States, under 18 U.S.C. § 287 and 18 U.S.C. § 2.[6]
Kahn went to Panama after the 2006 indictment, but was arrested and returned to the United States for the trial. During much of the trial, Kahn remained in his jail cell, refusing to participate and claiming that the court had no jurisdiction.[2] News reports indicated that Kahn "has no legal training but insists on representing himself and has made several missteps and peculiar motions. For example, he sought to be immediately freed because the indictment lists his name in all capital letters, and he claimed U.S. attorneys have no jurisdiction because Florida supposedly was never ceded to the federal government".[7] ]


These motions were denied.[8]"

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Right they are representing the crown in the name of the PERSON of the queen.

Thats the way it works. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Right they are representing the crown in the name of the PERSON of the queen.

Thats the way it works. 

No, that ain't the way it works,  even after the Crown Proceedings Act 1947, lawsuits against the Sovereign in his or her personal, private capacity are still inadmissible in British law.

quote:

It would also depend on how old those docs are. This stuff was not formal until about 1933ish in america.

quote:

or perhaps your cases were not tried here on earth?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

quote:

It would also depend on how old those docs are. This stuff was not formal until about 1933ish in america.

LOL I am not that old. They are from the 80s.

quote:

when I was a kid the cop had to prove someone was speeding now its guilty until you prove yourself innocent.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

when I was a kid the cop had to prove someone was speeding now its guilty until you prove yourself innocent.

Bullshit. You're tagged on radar. Proof.

I had a speeding ticket just last year--my attorney had it reduced to a parking ticket--no points, small fine.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

One word of caution: be very careful if you want to play around and do that on a brief because it will get kicked out and they will never give you a reason and you could severely fuck up someone defense.  There are very and I do mean very fine points in law here that you need to fully understand before you run out and play with this stuff.

If its a case you are in well no biggy if you dont mind losing before you start.

So for and on the record nothing I say is to be construed as legal advice and is for educational purposes only!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Which still leaves your statement incorrect.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

One word of caution: be very careful if you want to play around and do that on a brief because it will get kicked out and they will never give you a reason and you could severely fuck up someone defense.  There are very and I do mean very fine points in law here that you need to fully understand before you run out and play with this stuff.

If its a case you are in well no biggy if you dont mind losing before you start.

So for and on the record nothing I say is to be construed as legal advice and is for educational purposes only!

Well, the cases I've done - and incidentally have never lost to date - have all been breach of contract cases, mostly me doing the plaintiff part (claimant here now) but occasionally the defendant. This is rather dodgy here, since I'm not a qualified lawyer and shouldnt conduct litigation unless the court allows it - so far they have allowed it because, it seems, they appear happy that I know what I'm doing.

So, I dont know what to say

E

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

so it would be different if I were suing in my own name or conducting my own defence?

E