WyldHrt
Posts: 6412
Joined: 6/5/2008 Status: offline
|
Your post is a welcome relief from the drivel I just responded to, thank you for that. quote:
Of course there isn't a perfect example of this.....hence the reason to strive to create one...... Again, how do we do that? Make things exactly equal for more than one generation without penalizing those who succeed? quote:
I don't agree with the premise we wouldn't have the motivation to create.....And for this I make a difference in creating things from marketing things. Bill Gates didn't invent the modern pc or program...he simply marketed it to his advantage, Henry Ford didn't invent the automobile, he marketed it the best. Real creators , inventors simply don't do it for the money they do it for the love of it. Are you telling me you wouldn't do anything unless you are paid to do it? I don't believe that. And, while we are at it, does it make sense that people that are simply involved in financial dealings which do not create one simple things should be able to make 100's of millions of dollars per year? The guy that drove Lehmans in the ground was doing nothing but bundling things that were worth x and convincing people to buy them for y. It created not one thing in this world. Yet, the behavior is rewarded. A good point, but not quite where I was going. Inventors are a bit of a different breed (Dad was one). My point was that, if you are making $45,000 a year flipping burgers, why would you put in the hard work and struggle of med school (or business school, or law school or starting your own business) if the result is that you will be working your ass off and still earn $45,000 per year? Some people would, simply for the love of what they do. But most probably wouldn't. This is a fundamental issue with communism, it encourages mediocrity through lack of reward for those who put in extra hard work and effort. quote:
And for Doctors.....there are plenty of doctors that practice for the money but do you suppose that the care you get is good? I mean that leads one into talking about how and why people are allowed into Medical School. Does it make sense to base those things simply on test scores? I think not. Some do it for money, others because they like helping people. TBH, as long as they are good at what they do, their motivation isn't something that concerns me all that much. As for test scores, I don't know about you, but I don't really want the kid that failed his human physiology final working on me. quote:
Its nice to see that you think change would be good. I had thought that maybe you thought status quo was really good enough. Lastly, the old canard about not throwing money at education is a bunch of shit. You spend the same amount of money on facilities, boos, classrooms, computers, teacher/student ratios that you do in some of the more affluent suburbs of this country and bring that the inner city. I would bet my ass that test scores in the inner cities would fly to the top. Step into an inner city elementary school someday. Compare/contrast. It isn't even an arguement. I'll have to defer to your experience on that, but my bet is that the money won't change things nearly as much if there isn't an accompanying change in the community. As I pointed out to thompsonx, nowhere did I say that money would not be part of bringing a positive change.
_____________________________
"MotherFUCKER!" is NOT a safeword!!"- Steel "We've had complaints about 'orgy noises'. This is not the neighborhood for that kind of thing"- PVE Cop Resident "Hypnotic Eyes", "Cleavage" and "Toy Whore" Subby Mafia, VAA Posse & Team Troll!
|