RE: single males vs couples

RE: single males vs couples (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

Toppingfrmbottom -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 3:16:57 PM)
I personally would seek only single males if I was single myself. Because One I am not interested in being a third, and two I am selfish and I don't share my partner full time. A fling now and then with another third party, should all consent is fine, but a full out all the time 3 person dynamic hell no.

Masterfrank1962 -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 3:19:26 PM)
Ok everyone I have removed somethings from my profile. so i'll see if that helps. Thank you everyone, Frank

jbcurious -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 3:27:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: reynardfox Why would a girl NOT prefer a couple over a single male? Two Doms, happily married and skilled and experienced in what we do, who would be willing to lavish both of our attentions on one girl. NO possible relationship issues, no jealousy, no agenda, just trust and integrity and lots and lots of erotic play, that can go on for hour after hour, the divine combination of a strong female will and the gender empathy and understanding She brings to it, as well as the more direct masculine approach combined. I'll put it this way, it works. We don't go short around here. Because some of us are seeking more then a Dom, we want a Dom, a partner and a friend to share our life with.

LadyAngelika -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 3:29:11 PM)
quote: This question interested me so I did a quick survey using the following criteria: CM users in 2010 Females in my country Aged between 30 and 25. I did the same but in the OP's state. And since he is 47, I went with a more age appropriate group. I searched female submissives in North Carolina between the ages of 30 and 50 of all sexualities and of all ethnicities in the age range of 30-50 who checked the box seeking Dominant men AND who were online in the last month and there were 125. Then, I searched female submissives in North Carolina between the ages of 30 and 50 of all sexualities and of all ethnicities in the age range of 30-50 who checked the box seeking Dominant couples AND who were online in the last month and there were 23. Isn't nice when someone's observation is a figment of their imagination? - LA

peppermint -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 5:05:42 PM)
Excuse me for saying this. I have been on Collarme for 5 years and I have never seen a profile of someone who said she was only interested in couples and wanted nothing to do with single males. Guess I must have missed that more than 50% you talk about. So what state are you looking in? There are tons of couples looking for those females. In the forums those females are often called unicorns for their rarity, and yet you discover a herd of them. Why don't you share?

VaguelyCurious -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 5:13:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: peppermint Excuse me for saying this. I have been on Collarme for 5 years and I have never seen a profile of someone who said she was only interested in couples and wanted nothing to do with single males. In fairness, I've seen a lot of them-but that might be because my profile parameters are often set to people seeking Dommes, which would bias the results. 'Most' is a bit strong, but they definitely exist. The key, OP, is that they are normally looking for women or couples-face it, these are either ladies who like ladies or gentlemen pretending to be ladies who like ladies. Either way, as a single male you aren't going to be what they are looking for.

LadyAngelika -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 5:34:21 PM)
quote: 'Most' is a bit strong, but they definitely exist. Indeed. I gave him stats. 125 women between the ages of 30 and 50 in his state who are interested in Dominant men logged in during the last 30 days as opposed to 23 who state they are interested in Dominant couples. The ration is 5 to 1 for Dominant men over Dominant couples in his area. - LA

peppermint -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 5:41:05 PM)
quote: In fairness, I've seen a lot of them-but that might be because my profile parameters are often set to people seeking Dommes, which would bias the results. 'Most' is a bit strong, but they definitely exist. I am very sure they do exist but have never seen them. As to my profile parameters, I have mine set for everyone and anyone. I don't sort people out. I just like to see the people I know. I like to contact new people in my area to invite them to munch. I'll read the profiles of those people who have interesting names. Sometimes I'll just go read profiles for the heck of it.

VaguelyCurious -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 5:47:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika quote: 'Most' is a bit strong, but they definitely exist. Indeed. I gave him stats. 125 women between the ages of 30 and 50 in his state who are interested in Dominant men logged in during the last 30 days as opposed to 23 who state they are interested in Dominant couples. The ration is 5 to 1 for Dominant men over Dominant couples in his area. - LA I suspect those stats might be misleading-not everyone who would be willing to settle for a couple (which is the impression I've got from looking at a couple of these profiles) would have the 'seeking couples' box ticked.

LadyAngelika -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 5:49:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious quote: ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika quote: 'Most' is a bit strong, but they definitely exist. Indeed. I gave him stats. 125 women between the ages of 30 and 50 in his state who are interested in Dominant men logged in during the last 30 days as opposed to 23 who state they are interested in Dominant couples. The ration is 5 to 1 for Dominant men over Dominant couples in his area. - LA I suspect those stats might be misleading-not everyone who would be willing to settle for a couple (which is the impression I've got from looking at a couple of these profiles) would have the 'seeking couples' box ticked. Ok, so put in a margin of error. The ratio is still high enough to withstand that and the argument still holds water. - LA

auditguy -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 5:59:28 PM)
Wow, Frank is getting killed here, dang. I think that behind the potentially poor choice of words, he was just looking for a reason why a woman would be looking for a couple, exclusive of single dominant men. One reply, Reynardfox, actually addressed that topic, not a bad reply at that. More importantly Frank, don't change anything in your profile unless you truly believe in what you are writing. If your profile had exactly what you were looking for and what you were feeling, then that is the best thing to write. That way when someone contacts you, both of you will know exactly what you are interested in and there will not be any hard feelings later. It is always worse to have a disconnect after both of you have invested time into establishing a connection and a repor, only to find out one of you was holding something back, cause he was afraid of what people on a message board were thinking of his profile. The vanilla world was created for bull shitting about your true interests and intentions, this site is supposed to be here for people to be honest, no matter the kinkiness or perverseness of their thoughts or tastes, without the fear of being ridiculed and judged by others. On a final note, from a quick and unscientific survey of this thread I have concluded that most people posting on here are judgmental douches (now I probably need to include myself in this group, but that is another thread), so write whatever your heart tells you to say in your profile and ignore the comments from asses.

DesFIP -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 6:00:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Masterfrank1962 Ok everyone I have removed somethings from my profile. so i'll see if that helps. Thank you everyone, Frank No because it still tells us nothing about you. What are you passionate about? Not sex or play. Most of life is spent doing ordinary stuff; work, chores, watching tv. What a woman here wants to know is the same as a woman anywhere else. Are we compatible? Are you cool, calm and collected or do you come home and kick the dog if the boss yelled at you? Are you someone with enough shared interests that we can talk about it? Do you have a shared sense of humor, movies, etc.

VampiresLair -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 6:04:08 PM)
Most of the time I see someone looking for a couple, if its a female, she wll be interested in a Female Domme or a couple. Actually, the vast majority of the females I see on here who state they are interested potentially in a couple say a Single Female or Couple. So, they arent interested in men, but ill tolerate one for the right woman. Pretty simple explination in my head at least. DV

RedMagic1 -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 6:08:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: auditguy One reply, Reynardfox, actually addressed that topic, not a bad reply at that. Reynardfox provided a sales pitch, devoid of hard data. Other posters either ran tests, or spoke to patterns on these boards that have been visible for years. You fell for the self-serving sales pitch, and discounted the statements grounded in the scientific method. You may be dominant in personal relationships, but your post indicates to me that you are manipulable in professional situations. Reality really is more real than opinion.

auditguy -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 6:12:35 PM)
Ok Freud, I might be manipulated, but you completely miss the point of my post. Although as they say, ignorance is bliss.

LadyAngelika -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 6:16:44 PM)
quote: On a final note, from a quick and unscientific survey of this thread I have concluded that most people posting on here are judgmental douches You know sweetheart, when you are pointing a finger at someone, remember, there are 3 pointing back at you. ;-) - LA

LadyAngelika -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 6:18:20 PM)
quote: Reality really is more real than opinion. And intelligence is sexy ;-) - LA

domiguy -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 6:25:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RedMagic1 quote: ORIGINAL: auditguy One reply, Reynardfox, actually addressed that topic, not a bad reply at that. Reynardfox provided a sales pitch, devoid of hard data. Other posters either ran tests, or spoke to patterns on these boards that have been visible for years. You fell for the self-serving sales pitch, and discounted the statements grounded in the scientific method. You may be dominant in personal relationships, but your post indicates to me that you are manipulable in professional situations. Reality really is more real than opinion. This is why I need to take some classes in human interaction. I suck at it. You are so nice to good ol' Reynard, I just said the guy was kind of creepy. Oh Master Red, please teach me how to be nice. Jeffff was mentoring me but that guy is a total dick! Think of the gash I could stack with you help. Make me whole.

auditguy -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 6:25:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika quote: On a final note, from a quick and unscientific survey of this thread I have concluded that most people posting on here are judgmental douches You know sweetheart, when you are pointing a finger at someone, remember, there are 3 pointing back at you. ;-) - LA Ohh, without question. I don't deny the fact that I am an ass, which would have been apparent if you did not take that quote out of context (you should work on Capital Hill by the way, that skill is in much demand there), the next statement included me in that category. The only difference is that I don't hide it and I don't jump on a guy, who probably was genuinely interested in getting some feedback, and made an apparent cardinal sin of generalizing and not using scientific method in a discussion on a message board.

DesFIP -> RE: single males vs couples (5/1/2010 6:42:53 PM)
I'm still trying to figure out how you think you're easy going when your profile is all about destroying someone. Causing her to lose her job or be arrested as a sexual offender. Causing major psychological damage by trying to change her core personality. As far as 'punishment' being tattoos and piercings, no thanks Dr Mengele.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875