RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Jeffff -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 4:48:25 PM)

I don't generally share a lot of stuff about my life here.

I personally knew young men who have died on foreign soil while serving.

You make me sick.




herfacechair -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 4:50:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL:  pyroaquatic

quote:

Understand that out there, out in sector, you don't have the convenience that you do sitting at home. You're in an environment where people want you dead. You have to act accordingly. Westerners and media, that are out there, are briefed on what they should do when going out there, and interacting with coalition forces. Some of them simply don't do the smart things.


Do long distance 'wish-you-were-dead' cards count? So 2,976 of our civil forces were slain by the acts of foreign bodies.

Add 4730 due to the war efforts.

Crashing into our territory like that poses some ill-tempered psychological and economical damage that is felt even now. I'm looking at this with the perspective of the butterfly affect.

Like spreading a pat of butter on a twelve foot piece of bread.

Do these ANTIBODIES yield to appropriate security forces ever or do they still cast themselves into martyrdom?

Thank you for wanting to take a bullet for me. Now I can safely invent some sort of world-changing contraption and NOT be dead.

Again,

Thank you and all the other boys and girls too.


In a discussion involving what's going on in Iraq, vice here, no. The majority of the people that I'm debating with have no direct experience with the terrorist attacks of 9/11. The factors that you raise in that post can be used in a discussion regarding asymmetrical warfare, re, using airplanes as "cruise missiles," but being in the United States when all of that happened doesn't put you on the same footing as someone that has deployed to Iraq when arguing about what's going on in Iraq.

Now to approach this from the second path. When was the last time the terrorists tried to mortar you, attack you, or lay an IED in your path? It's true that they want us all dead all over the world, but their efforts are mainly focused on the frontlines now... which creates the environment you alluded to, our willing to take a bullet to make sure that the terrorists main attempts remain in the Middle East rather than here, thus guaranteeing our civilization and way of doing things continued existence.

Third, "antibodies"? Apparently, your experiences, listed in the above quote, doesn't give you the up-front facts as to what's going on in Iraq. Those that you label as the "antibodies" are COWARDS. They DON'T represent the interests of the Iraqi Population, who have no problems dropping the dime on these "antibodies." The vast majority of the Iraqi people OPPOSE these clowns that you call "antibodies." Here's a more accurate term for them, the Anti-Iraqi Forces are more comparable to CANCER cells than they are to "antibodies." The REAL antibodies are the Iraqi Military and Iraqi Military, who pursue the interest of the Iraqi people when they go after and destroy, disrupt and capture members of these terrorists groups.

Leave the war dead out of your discussions, the vast majority of them believed in the very things that I'm arguing here. They did it for the reasons I argued here. You've got not legs, or right, to use them in an argument against the very cause the vast majority of them believed in.




herfacechair -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 4:52:21 PM)

pyroaquatic: You do not have to join the military to experience some pretty fucked up things. To some people tragedy strikes naturally and often. I'm not dead yet.

I'm going to relate my experiences as they relate to the Iraq War. We're debating that topic, not the fire that the firemen fought downtown, not the high speed chase that the cops were involved with, not the close call that you had with a mall shooter, not that drunk driver that almost ran your family over... we're arguing about what's happening with regards to Iraq. MY experiences, and what I've done, are relevant, and gives me credibility where the opposition doesn't have any.

pyroaquatic: I find this post of yours in bad taste.

And I find your lack of understanding of what I said, and your taking my post out of context, in bad taste.

pyroaquatic: You put your life in danger. So do firefighters, police officers, nurses... and other civilian forces.

I placed my life in danger by deploying to Iraq. Firefighters put their lives in danger by engaging the fire, and rescuing people trapped in the fire. Police officers place their lives in danger when closing contact with the bad guy, or answering home calls that could lead to a shoot out. Nurses put their lives in danger depending on what medical case they're tending to, and where they're tending to it. Other civilian forces put their lives in danger doing the civilian duties that happen to be dangerous, like working on powerlines above the ground.

Now, drum roll please, WHAT'S this thread's title?

Does, "Back from Iraq for a short time, willing to answer questions" ring any bell? Nowhere in that title does it say anything about fighting fires, going after cars that refuse to stop, working on power lines, etc.

It talks about IRAQ!

Again, since we're talking about Iraq, my Iraq experiences are applicable, and give me credibility over the opposition, who've obviously didn't deploy to Iraq.


pyroaquatic: You are not greater or lesser than any other human being on this planet.

But when it comes to discussions on the Iraq War, my Iraq deployment experiences gives me more credibility in this discussion than, say, a cop or fireman who has never deployed to Iraq. Please let me know if you still can't see the elephant in the room.

pyroaquatic: You are simply doing your thing and throwing off the cover at the end.

I'm destroying the opposition, and throwing off their cover, showing them for what they really are rather than for what they think they are... or doing.

pyroaquatic: Nothing more or less in these worlds of dust.

I'm arguing based on first-hand experience and extensive research. There's absolutely no "equivalence" between the opposition and me. They're wrong, it's that simple.

pyroaquatic: Surely you must understand.

I understand that you're just another person trying to "dismiss" the experiences that I have, as it destroys your side of the argument on the credibility front. What you've read in my posts, that's what I understand, as expressed on these posts.

pyroaquatic: EDITED CAUSE IM STOOPID :P

Your posts did an adequate job of informing the critical thinker of that information.




JstAnotherSub -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 4:53:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

Leave the war dead out of your discussions, the vast majority of them believed in the very things that I'm arguing here. They did it for the reasons I argued here. You've got not legs, or right, to use them in an argument against the very cause the vast majority of them believed in.
Neither do you, but you haven't let that slow you down one bit.  You really should be ashamed.

my opinion only of course.




dovie -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 4:54:20 PM)

Are you going to apply for service-connected disability for PTSD for OEF/OIF veterans?

dovie




herfacechair -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 4:55:41 PM)

angelikaJ: I find it very, very interesting that you seemed to miss my entire point and focused on one sentence instead.

Obviously, you don't know my mode of operation when I carry debates out. I read your entire post, and even watched the video that you linked to. I'm going to focus on the parts of your posts that I deem need the most focusing on. Any intelligent person would notice that I'll address the parts of people's posts that I DISAGREE with. Since you're "big" on "perfection," you should've picked up on that. Stay with me, logic dictates that if I focus on what I disagree with, there might be a chance that I won't address what I don't care about, with what I'm neutral with, or with what I agree with.

HENCE, my addressing "that one" part of the post while not mentioning the rest.

What I said still stands, I've seen numerous posters, over the past few years, come out acting the way you act, pretending to be neutral, when they end up giving hints as to who they're really supporting.

However, to prove to you that I read everything the opposition says, I'm going to dismantle your comments.


angelikaJ: As for mnottertail, and thompsonx, it was an entirely different kind of war.

That's beside the point. A Vietnam Veteran raised me, and I had a chance to meet his Vietnam Veteran friends. We may have served in different time periods, and different theaters, but one major trend remains. We could relate to each other, and we think alike most the time. The posers mnottertail and thompsonx don't come anywhere near them in experience, or statements, nor do they come anywhere near the military when it comes to expressing their outrageous stories.

Their stories are clearly made up. They had an opportunity to serve in Vietnam, but they didn't for one reason or another. Now here they are, on this thread, acting like they deployed there. They're the ones that deserved this comment:

"I will say this: if your tales are just that... tales belonging to other people or things entirely made up, then you should be wholly ashamed of yourself...The sacrifices made by the people who lived at the domiciliary are not to be mocked or diminished by anyone's deceptions." -- angelikaJ

It's people like those two, and others that I caught on this thread, that deserve that comment. Not me, I've challenged people, offered to prove that I am who I say I am, and I did what I say I did.


angelikaJ: And guess what? I was born in an army hospital in 1962.

Being born in an Army hospital in 1962 doesn't give you the same experience that someone that, say, went through basic training, to AIT, then to their permanent unit, would experience. Already, you've lost credibility with your insinuations as to whether you could spot a poser or not.

angelikaJ: If they fabricated, I likely would have called them on it and you might not know... I do have over 3000 posts... and also have a habit of sending personal cmails if I have something substantial to say.

Call them on it with what? The experience you gained when an Army doctor smacked your ass when you were born? The fact of the matter is that you didn't call them out on this thread. To anybody that has served, their stories, as well as those of the other posters here who are posers, don't jive with what we know of someone that actually has served in the military.

In order to be able to spot a poser on this thread, to spot someone here claiming to be in the military but they're not, you have to have actual military experience. There's a way, just by talking to people, and listening to them speak, to know whether they're in the military or not. Actually having military experience helps in that end. Nowhere in your post do you claim that you served, or if you did, it wouldn't appear that you served a good length of time. I'm sorry, but your time in an Army hospital, or as an Army brat, doesn't give you the military experience you'd get if you were to actually be in the military. I've been both a military dependent, and someone in the military; they're two different worlds.


angelikaJ: You accuse me of having doubts ... and ironically it is your behavior that suggests them to me.

This is one of the biggest things that argue against your supposed claim to be able to spot a poser. Because, if you knew how those of us in the military truly behaved, you wouldn't see my response to you as being strange. In real life, we're much "worse" than what I am here when dealing with people trying to put an act on us, the way you're doing here.

You should hear what other people in the military, in all branches, say about people believing, and arguing, the same things about the opposition argue.


angelikaJ: I am someone who does not follow the crowd and needs to make up her own mind about things; about people.

Your actions here are consistent with what the opposition is doing. You have obvious posers, mnottertail/thompsonx, who you've continuously given a free pass to. You've even tried to come up with an excuse for them... "that was a different war." Never mind, for instance, that there's one thread that's consistent in the military throughout all this time. You're willing to say, "what if what they say is true" with regards to me, but nothing about the faker's claims.

Like I've said, I've debated perpetually for years, and I've came across people like you who try to sound "neutral," who're actually siding with the opposition.


angelikaJ:But in what you quoted there was only one sentence you seemed to read.

WRONG, I read the whole thing. That was the one sentence that I FOCUSED my response to. It's the way I do things. Whenever I get a post that "acts" like it's "on my side," or "neutral," I go through it and, the moment I see an attack, I'm going to treat the whole thing as an attack.

angelikaJ: I was quite ready to give you the benefit of the doubt until I had read, researched and came to my own conclusions... and now I am not so sure... it seems as though you doth protest too much.

Did you say, researched? Well lucky you! I'm going to be meeting someone that's also a collarchat poster. I'm going to show her my cac card (ID Card), My ERB, as well as our platoon "year book," that shows photos of me in Iraq. If you're the type that does her research before coming to conclusions, you'd definitely wait to see what this poster has to say before you "doubt" my statements, as you're willing to do. Since you "do" your "research," you'd follow the fact trail, not your emotions.




domiguy -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 4:56:21 PM)

So when did you discover that you were a sub? You are perfect army material. The do what you are told type.

Male little subby bitches, like yourself, Usually harbor a lot of resentment for themselves, tend to be very angry at the world for what they have allowed themselves to have become. I understand how you are incapable of creating your own thoughts and how difficult it is for you to stand on your own to feet when the majority of your adult life you have probably been on all fours.

You poor bastard, I almost feel sorry for you now.




pahunkboy -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 4:56:31 PM)

Dude, building 7 was imploded.


9-11 is not what you think it is.





herfacechair -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 4:57:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL:  JstAnotherSub

hahahaha, you busted me.

Again, you are adorable.  fullashit to the eyeballs, but adorable. Repeat Point

Wait, who am I? How do I have a child who is 22 when I am only 30?  Where did all these gray hairs come from?  I just graduated from high school a few years ago.  WTF do you mean my 30 year class reunion is coming up?  I am only a baby my self!

No way I was born in 1962-that would make me 48!  No way I am 48 damn years old!  I am 30 and I was a 3 star general in Vietnam and I make all my own socks and I am on the verge of finding a cure for stupidity.

Thanks so much hfc, for throwing the cold water on my face and showing me reality!

I swear theres no way I am a day over 22!


Again, I proved you wrong, and even used your own words against you. Don't mistake my having the facts on my side as my being "full of shit."




pahunkboy -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 4:58:24 PM)

Would anyone like a glass of water?




herfacechair -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 5:00:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL:  DarlingSavage

How long is the OP's "short break" from Iraq? This thread was started on 5/5/2010.  Last I checked, a short break was something like a few days. 2 weeks tops. The OP sounded as though they would only be available for answering questions within a very short time frame, after which he would be unavailable for comment.  Well, it has now been over 2 months and the OP is still here arguing with people.  What's up with that?  It kind of looks suspicious.


Since you failed to read the entire thread before opening your mouth, let me help you out:

"Remember, I'm going to reply to this thread after I come back from Iraq. Or, will I even wait that long? Here's something you'd "love" to hear:" - herfacechair

They have internet access in Iraq, I'm going to renew my internet subscription when I get back. I could keep tabs on this thread even while there." --herfacechair


It doesn't matter if I don't get back with you today or tomorrow. If I don't get back to you today, I'll get back to you tomorrow, next week, next month, next year, next decade, "next century," and even the next lifetime. -herfacechair

And get this!

So even if I don't get back to you as a result of my going back to Iraq, I'll get back to you, and everybody else on this thread, when I get back... Which will be weeks after I get back there. So can it with your hopes that I leave this thread alone, not happening." - herfacechair

Do you see the underlined words?

"I'm back, this time for 2 years instead of 2 weeks!" --herfacechair

"I'm back from Iraq, and have a 2 year dwell time before I go back to the Middle East... this time to Afghanistan. I've been doing this since coming back from Operation Iraqi Freedom the first time; almost 7 years now." -- herfacechair

"I've done lots of traveling in this country since I came back from Iraq, and have met people from all walks of life, from all parts of the country." --herfacechair

Again, if you bothered to read the thread, instead of letting your lips run lose, you'd notice that I made it clear that I'm going to be in this thread as long as people reply to me. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that one out... my still being here shouldn't be a mystery to you, nor should it be cause for suspicion over what I wrote in the original post. Seeing how far this thread has gone would also clue you to the fact that I won't start a thread if I don't intend to argue it to conclusion.




JstAnotherSub -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 5:01:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

quote:

ORIGINAL:  JstAnotherSub

hahahaha, you busted me.

Again, you are adorable.  fullashit to the eyeballs, but adorable. Repeat Point

Wait, who am I? How do I have a child who is 22 when I am only 30?  Where did all these gray hairs come from?  I just graduated from high school a few years ago.  WTF do you mean my 30 year class reunion is coming up?  I am only a baby my self!

No way I was born in 1962-that would make me 48!  No way I am 48 damn years old!  I am 30 and I was a 3 star general in Vietnam and I make all my own socks and I am on the verge of finding a cure for stupidity.

Thanks so much hfc, for throwing the cold water on my face and showing me reality!

I swear theres no way I am a day over 22!


Again, I proved you wrong, and even used your own words against you. Don't mistake my having the facts on my side as my being "full of shit."
Please show me how you proved me wrong.  You took something I typed, that was obviously total bullshit, and you believed it and tried to use it against me.

Maybe that is why you think we would all believe this shit you type?  Do you really believe everything on the internet is true?

And I am not a day over 22....30....40.....48......ah hell I am 29 and holding.




herfacechair -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 5:02:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL:  DarlingSavage

Ok, I see. Well, there's so many of them, there's 55 pages here.  


The smart thing to do would be to read the entire thread instead of coming here and attempting to raise suspicion on me.




domiguy -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 5:02:54 PM)

So when did you discover that you were a sub? You are perfect army material. The do what you are told type.

Male little subby bitches, like yourself, Usually harbor a lot of resentment for themselves, tend to be very angry at the world for what they have allowed themselves to have become. I understand how you are incapable of creating your own thoughts and how difficult it is for you to stand on your own to feet when the majority of your adult life you have probably been on all fours.

You poor bastard, I almost feel sorry for you now.




herfacechair -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 5:05:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL:  ShaharThorne

I <3 the hide button...


Stupid people don't like to use the hide button, and they refuse to resist the urge to click on a thread, when it comes to debating with me. But there are worse people. Brain dead people would undo the hide button, then make comments about using that option again.




LadyPact -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 5:07:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

So when did you discover that you were a sub? You are perfect army material. The do what you are told type.

What the heck is wrong with that on a BDSM site? 

Actually, it tends to be something of an even split.  Plenty of Doms and subs in the military.




herfacechair -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 5:09:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL:  angelikaJ

quote:

ORIGINAL:  DarlingSavage

How long is the OP's "short break" from Iraq?  This thread was started on 5/5/2010.  Last I checked, a short break was something like a few days.  2 weeks tops.  The OP sounded as though they would only be available for answering questions within a very short time frame, after which he would be unavailable for comment.  Well, it has now been over 2 months and the OP is still here arguing with people.  What's up with that?  It kind of looks suspicious.


He was here, he left and for whatever reason after a short time he came back and is home for good as I understand it.


From earlier in this thread, in reply to Lady Pact

"My unit was originally scheduled to redeploy back to the United States before September 1, 2010. They scheduled the last leave block for the last half of May. See my leave R & R in that context, that R & R was available under the assumption that we were going to be in country for another 3 months." -herfacechair

"Now, our deployment ran into factors, like treaty requirements, as well as mission accomplishment/conditions on the ground, etc. It all worked out to where we turned our area of operations over to the Iraqis early. Our success basically "placed us out of a job." On the other side of the coin, there's precedence where units got their deployments extended. There were talks about moving us to another AO." - herfacechair

"So what do you do to the leave periods that are no longer months away from redeployment, but now less than 2 months? Those soldiers could be told, "nope, sorry, you're within the X month window to redeployment, so you're not going on leave!" Just to have the deployment extended." -herfacechair

"Allowing people to go on R and R as if we were going to redeploy right b before September 1 guarded against that scenario. Heck, we had one guy in our battalion come back from R and R... 7 days before our scheduled redeployment." -herfacechair




Jeffff -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 5:09:40 PM)

Oooooooraaaaaaaaaa!
[8D]





domiguy -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 5:10:09 PM)

Oh hush, that leather girl, I am conversing with this pussy.




dovie -> RE: Back from Iraq for a short time, ready to answer your questions if you have any... (7/15/2010 5:12:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

From earlier in this thread, in reply to Lady Pact

"My unit was originally scheduled to redeploy back to the United States before September 1, 2010. They scheduled the last leave block for the last half of May. See my leave R & R in that context, that R & R was available under the assumption that we were going to be in country for another 3 months." -herfacechair

"Now, our deployment ran into factors, like treaty requirements, as well as mission accomplishment/conditions on the ground, etc. It all worked out to where we turned our area of operations over to the Iraqis early. Our success basically "placed us out of a job." On the other side of the coin, there's precedence where units got their deployments extended. There were talks about moving us to another AO." - herfacechair

"So what do you do to the leave periods that are no longer months away from redeployment, but now less than 2 months? Those soldiers could be told, "nope, sorry, you're within the X month window to redeployment, so you're not going on leave!" Just to have the deployment extended." -herfacechair

"Allowing people to go on R and R as if we were going to redeploy right b before September 1 guarded against that scenario. Heck, we had one guy in our battalion come back from R and R... 7 days before our scheduled redeployment." -herfacechair




Are you going to apply for service-connected disability for PTSD for OEF/OIF veterans?  And because you keep running your mouth, you have mail on the other side.

dovie




Page: <<   < prev  55 56 [57] 58 59   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875