RE: Have any of you sent a woman a mean message and got a positive response? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master



Message


VaguelyCurious -> RE: Have any of you sent a woman a mean message and got a positive response? (5/11/2010 10:21:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

So............ "Answer Me bitch and let me help you get down on your knees"

Is not a good opener?

That explains a lot......... thanks!
Nah-you need to put a please at the beginning and a thankyou at the end.

It also helps if you send kisses.

And a 'PS: I know where you live...' never hurts.




Jeffff -> RE: Have any of you sent a woman a mean message and got a positive response? (5/11/2010 10:25:45 AM)

Got it... you have been invaluable!




sirsholly -> RE: Have any of you sent a woman a mean message and got a positive response? (5/11/2010 11:32:01 AM)

quote:

HELL yes. ALL of the perspective property I'M talkin to right now responded to ME telling them EXACTLY what I thought of them and what I will do to and with them.
what ol Goad is not saying is their response was "fuck you!"




WinsomeDefiance -> RE: Have any of you sent a woman a mean message and got a positive response? (5/11/2010 12:25:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mary94583a

I get so many, they fall into three categories

first category is = get down bitch
second category is = let me help you
third category is = why don't you answer me

I haven't yet figured how to filter out the wheat from the chaft



I found that any profile mentioning the serenity of sitting by a river and feeding ducks , with a vague mention to cuddling really helps keep away the spam and trolls. Who knew ducks and cuddling was that powerful? Just a little FYI to help you out.[:D]




Musicmystery -> RE: Have any of you sent a woman a mean message and got a positive response? (5/11/2010 4:02:32 PM)

Since the chaff is what you discard, and the wheat what you keep, a whole bunch is explained...along with questions raised!




Titanium0Master -> RE: Have any of you sent a woman a mean message and got a positive response? (5/11/2010 5:32:23 PM)

I'm sure some people get positive responses to rude messages, but my guess is that the response rate would be pretty low. The number of men sending rude messages is almost certainly a lot higher than the number of women who like to receive them. Of course, the number of men on sites like this always vastly outnumbers the number of females anyway. Many years ago when the internet was new and I used IRC, I used to frequently get women (and men, although I politely informed them I was not interested in them) who would request a private chat with me and then immediately start degrading themselves verbally before I even had a chance to say anything, so I know first hand that some people want to be treated rudely from the start.

It all boils down to who you are and what you are looking for. There are certainly some women who like those types of messages, and there are definitely a lot of men who think that is the way women who identify themselves as subs/slaves want to be treated. Although my guess is that the vast majority of those men are new to the lifestyle and are just acting like they think a Dom is supposed to act.

The best thing is to just be who you are and accept that some people are going to be interested and others are not.




allthatjaz -> RE: Have any of you sent a woman a mean message and got a positive response? (5/12/2010 1:34:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterGoad88

HELL yes.  ALL of the perspective property I'M talkin to right now responded to ME telling them EXACTLY what I thought of them and what I will do to and with them.  It takes the right kind of magnitism that most can't pull off but those of US who can will ALWAYS get first pick and the "nice guys" can have all the rest.


Some people spend far too much time up their own ass and when they eventually appear into the daylight they are never sure which hole to talk from.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.515625E-02