RE: UK Election result (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


NorthernGent -> RE: UK Election result (5/12/2010 2:49:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I can only see stills her I have to be in CA or UK to see anything, but I imagine it is a pretty place, in your mind,  kinda like keeping up appearances is in Hyacinth's.



There's no place like a load of old people gossiping about the neighbours and arguing with one another....hour after hour......it's a place I like to call home.




NorthernGent -> RE: UK Election result (5/12/2010 2:59:24 PM)

Ahh yes.....the political attention span of the English.....8 measly pages...and "ah fuck it....who cares anyway......what's happening on Coronation Street".




mnottertail -> RE: UK Election result (5/12/2010 3:01:35 PM)

8 pages?  fuck it, a political topic has a staying power of about .000000000008ths of a sentence with yanks.  consider yourselves tenacious and single minded. in fact, you're bleeding Volgons compared to many armchair and whisky politicos.




ShaharThorne -> RE: UK Election result (5/12/2010 3:05:11 PM)

What does the resignation of Brown do to British politics?  I have been thinking of this since yesterday when I hear it on CNN.




Jeffff -> RE: UK Election result (5/12/2010 3:05:48 PM)

The UK, didn't that used to be a country?

Refresh My memory.




kittinSol -> RE: UK Election result (5/12/2010 3:06:46 PM)

Nothing. Life goes on. There's a new PM and that's it. People go to the pub.




ShaharThorne -> RE: UK Election result (5/12/2010 3:13:50 PM)

I take a stout...




NorthernGent -> RE: UK Election result (5/12/2010 3:18:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

8 pages?  fuck it, a political topic has a staying power of about .000000000008ths of a sentence with yanks.  consider yourselves tenacious and single minded. in fact, you're bleeding Volgons compared to many armchair and whisky politicos.



A while back continental Europeans used to marvel at English participation in civic responsibilities....and that bloke de Tocqueville once said: "the average American is better fed....better educated.....and more politically minded than the average European". Where it did it all go wrong eh....or perhaps there's a link between education and not expecting too much from the political classes.




NorthernGent -> RE: UK Election result (5/12/2010 3:27:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaharThorne

What does the resignation of Brown do to British politics?  I have been thinking of this since yesterday when I hear it on CNN.



Good question...a capable politician has been replaced with a couple of PR merchants....so the new regime should lead to choas and disorder in the House of Commons which is no mean feat considering they usually spend their time in the House of Commons laughing at one another anyway.

Here they are in action....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iPaiylUYW0

And George Osborne....the smug one....sat behind Cameron in the blue tie...acting like a child......Christ we're in trouble with this lot.




kittinSol -> RE: UK Election result (5/12/2010 3:30:25 PM)

When  American politicians see what happens at PM Question Time, they shiver in their boots, and I'm not even mentioning the effect Jeremy Paxman would have on them.





NorthernGent -> RE: UK Election result (5/12/2010 3:36:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

When  American politicians see what happens at PM Question Time, they shiver in their boots, and I'm not even mentioning the effect Jeremy Paxman would have on them.



Shiver in their boots? I'd be surprised......more like shaking their heads at a load of children masquerading as politicians.

And Paxman is pathetic. All of that talking over and interrupting the people he's supposed to be interviewing is cringeworthy.

From what I've seen of US politicians being interviewed on British television....I doubt they'd entertain any of that childish nonsense that goes on in the House of Commons or passes for a Paxman interview. 




Politesub53 -> RE: UK Election result (5/12/2010 3:43:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaharThorne

What does the resignation of Brown do to British politics?  I have been thinking of this since yesterday when I hear it on CNN.


This is a very intersting question. When Blair left office, it was obvious Brown would be shoehorned into number 10. Now brown has gone, the big question is which way will the party go. Towards the Brownites or the Blairites ? I really hope labour doesnt drop back into its marxist ways and becomes a more inclusive party. I think that the electorate want a middle of the road, inclusive party, in power.

The first of the three major parties to grasp this has the best chance of winning the next election. Internal strife within the Labour party and a successful coaliton between the Conservatives and Lib Dems could keep Labour out of power for the next few elections. I really hope Labour recover quickly and form a strong opposition.




Aneirin -> RE: UK Election result (5/12/2010 4:47:20 PM)

What do the labour party do to improve their chances, well, that is simple, just mirror the policies of the new government and leave the rest to PR.




Moonhead -> RE: UK Election result (5/13/2010 6:16:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
in fact, you're bleeding Volgons compared to many armchair and whisky politicos.

No he isn't: Bill Savage chased the Volgans out of the country years ago.




tigreetsa -> RE: UK Election result (5/13/2010 7:26:36 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Now brown has gone, the big question is which way will the party go.



I honestly believe that the best solution is for the Labour Party to either split or to do what it did in the 1970's and spawn another political party, such as what became the Lib Dems.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Towards the Brownites or the Blairites ?



That would be like the Conservatives going back to the Thatcherists. Clinging to the past is one of the problems we have in British politics.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

I really hope labour doesnt drop back into its marxist ways and becomes a more inclusive party.



What like New Labour? I actually disagree here and quite strongly and think that if anything the Labour Party needs to rediscover Marx just as much as we as a nation need to get back to Keynes. We can't go on living off the banks or the government because that's what this big issue is all about - the deficit.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

I think that the electorate want a middle of the road, inclusive party, in power.



I disagree also very strongly here. I think that the majority of the electorate don't want a political system dominated by either one or two major parties because that is what we've had for donkey's years and look where it's got us. This last General Election was a very negative one, both in terms of the campaigns by all the three main partries and in the voting choices of the majority of the electorate who either didn't want Brown or they didn't want Cameron. This is even without speculating why the rest of the people didn't bother to vote.

We are a diverse society and I honestly believe that we need a much more diverse political system with more political parties embracing both the left and the right. The people in Wales didn't want the Conservatives, nor did the people in Scotland and in many places in the North of England but tough because enough people in the South and Midlands turned out to give them that slender majority and this is precisely what's wrong with our political system - that lack of diversity.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

The first of the three major parties to grasp this has the best chance of winning the next election. Internal strife within the Labour party and a successful coaliton between the Conservatives and Lib Dems could keep Labour out of power for the next few elections. I really hope Labour recover quickly and form a strong opposition.


I disagree strongly here also. The whole point of democracy isn't about winning an election and having the power - why else would you get millions of Eastern Europeans struggling and doing whatever they could to overthrow communism? Yeah right, and the Catholic Church in Poland proved to be such strong, effective opposition that it got people like Jerzy Popileuszki murdered by government agents.

Go read the other threads in this section started by the Americans who also believe that democracy is also about winning elections.

I'm sorry but I cannot accept totalitarianism as a form of democracy. Democracy to me isn't about having large inclusive parties or about winning elections but about forming governments which are representative of the views of the electorate.

I voted Labour in the General Election and I did so for local reasons, because I live in the Tory controlled borough of Wandsworth and it was a marginal seat. I'm assuming that you voted Conservative, I also accept that we now have a government dominated by the Conservatives. I would still buy you a beer even though you're a Tory and we often disagree on the boards just as much as I hope that this government succeeds. I believe in democracy, I see no reason to hate you because you are a Tory just the same as I assume you don't get too upset over my being a socialist.

Democracy to me means having the choice to vote for the party which best reflects your own personal political views and interests and accepting that the government is formed from a consensus of political opinion in the country.

The Second World War started because of political divisions between left and right and the hatred it caused between people and there are many who have not really moved on from that point or learned the lessons. Those same divisions are what today are creating very strong social divisions in the United States. Who knows? They might by now be enjoying universal healthcare if they only could achieve some sort of agreement despite their political differences.

Our political system isn't going to change as a result of a party winning the election, but as a result of changes in the way we - the people - think and what we do to bring about those changes. Maybe when we can learn as a nation to appreciate freedom and democracy and to accept that people with different political opinions serve to protect that democracy and freedom, then maybe we can start working towards political diversity and stop electing our own totalitarian regimes.

It's not necessary, and it doesn't serve the interests of the country as a whole. 





LadyEllen -> RE: UK Election result (5/13/2010 8:04:26 AM)

BLASPHEMER! HERETIC!

just lucky you confessed to being a socialist so as to invoke the defence of insanity, or it'd be the high jump for you

E




SohCahToa -> RE: UK Election result (5/13/2010 10:40:39 AM)

If you mix the extreme left of the liberal democrats with the extreme right of the conservatives, what you end up with is a Labour government in 2-5 years.[:D]

We know the next government will be a poisoned chalice, for the 'Liberal Conservative' coalition and also know the Liberal democrats will find themselves locked into the decisions of this government. So their typical supporters are going to desert them in five years and possibly wonder how the likes of Nick Clegg are able to set themselves apart from those conservatives. I means if there are no real differences and this coalition can get by then what differences were we actually voting for and how does the liberal democrat party justify it's existence.

Lucky now we the English won't be held to ransom by those nationalists, I was watching an interview with Alex Salmond (a week back) about how the Labour party should form a coalition with the SNP . I think he needs a lesson in maths because even with all the Nationalists, not forgetting the likes of the DUP had already aligned themselves with the conservatives, a Labour coalition with anyone would not have realistically worked.

The Liberal Conservative alliance looks promising but we all know that individual politicians don't always vote with their party, so start looking for that 55% no confidence vote if the direction is heading away from the Lib Dems.

I won't be voting for PR in any upcoming referendum because I like the status quo and don't like being held to random by a party that only acquired fifty odd seats especially when some of those seats were probably Labour supporters voting tactically.

Is anyone going to put (1) next to labour and (2) next to conservative on that PR form, or vice versa??? What we need is a system where the single vote of the politician is weighted by the share of the vote they got in their constituency. If we had three MP's for each seat elected to parliament (one from each party) and reduced the overall number of seats by two thirds, now that would be progress. Then our vote in the commons would be proportional to the party allegiances we all seem to have. i.e. if we are going to vote for teams rather than people.






Politesub53 -> RE: UK Election result (5/13/2010 11:13:14 AM)

quote:

I'm sorry but I cannot accept totalitarianism as a form of democracy. Democracy to me isn't about having large inclusive parties or about winning elections but about forming governments which are representative of the views of the electorate.



Totalitarian......Youre having a laugh Stella. You need to learn the difference between totalitarian and majority. You also need to read up on what started the second world war. It certainly wasnt an argument between right and left. Eastern Europe was never truly democratic, except in name only.




Moonhead -> RE: UK Election result (5/13/2010 12:42:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Eastern Europe was never truly democratic, except in name only.

You can always tell when somebody on here's from Europe: they have a clue what communism and socialism actually involve rather than blathering a load of drivel they picked up from Ayn Rand by way of Joe McCarthy...
[:D]




Phoenixpower -> RE: UK Election result (5/13/2010 12:56:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaharThorne

What does the resignation of Brown do to British politics?  I have been thinking of this since yesterday when I hear it on CNN.


This is a very intersting question. When Blair left office, it was obvious Brown would be shoehorned into number 10. Now brown has gone, the big question is which way will the party go.


I had my nightshift last night again and this morning they showed newspaper titles as usual in news programmes, I heared the title being read "the happy couple at Number 10", had a look at the screen and expected cameron and his wife on the frontpage from that paper there (the guardian)...only to realise it was Cameron and Clegg to show....gosh they make their fun of them now...[8|]




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 [8] 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875