Democracy y/n? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Elisabella -> Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 12:52:10 AM)

I'm having serious issues with the concept of democracy. What happens to rule by the people when the people are unfit to rule? Are democratically elected politicians supposed to lead the people, or are they supposed to represent the will of the people?

After the Revolution, France was a disaster. Napoleon Bonaparte stabilized it. He was a tyrant...and probably the best thing that could have happened to France at that time.

I hate to say this, because it makes me sound like an elitist, but looking at what's happening in the US, I wonder whether the people deserve a democracy. I don't mean people with unpopular opinions, I think they should always have a right to vote their conscience, but rather people who say things like "Keep your government hands off my Medicare" - I read somewhere that only 2 out of 5 Americans can name the three branches of federal government.

That means the majority of Americans are able to vote for something they are wholly unqualified to make decisions about. And that bothers me.

I don't know where I'm going with this post, I just want to get a bit of feedback. I'm not advocating for tyranny, I just wonder, what justification IS there for democracy, when the people aren't living up to their part of the bargain?




luckydawg -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 2:06:08 AM)

Well, to start we have a republic, not a democracy. That is intended to keep ignorant massess from doing whatever strikes thier fancy, at least quickly.

Originally also only people who had property or other stakes in society got to vote.

That the illiterate rabble and deranged (look at the bizzare ideas positied by some of the posters on here----Infant mortality is irrelevant is the most recent one to make me laugh my ass off)get the same vote as I makes me wonder about the future of the West.




Aneirin -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 4:49:42 AM)

I understand your founding fathers gave you a republic, but since your last president, I always understood the American way to be an oligarchy

But watching the video, America has a striking resemblance to ancient Rome, with a lot of similarities.




Louve00 -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 5:27:15 AM)

In school I was taught that America is a democracy.  I once had a conversation with one of my daughters counselors and asked her what a republic was and surprisingly, she didn't even know!  But really, we are more a democratic republic.  We live and abide by the law (umm...usually), but we vote for what we want by the voting process and by voting in representatives to represent our will.  




pahunkboy -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 5:47:07 AM)

What we have is a central bank.




Real0ne -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 5:49:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

In school I was taught that America is a democracy.  I once had a conversation with one of my daughters counselors and asked her what a republic was and surprisingly, she didn't even know!  But really, we are more a democratic republic.  We live and abide by the law (umm...usually), but we vote for what we want by the voting process and by voting in representatives to represent our will.  


Teachers today are like really ignorant.

in a democracy sovereignty is with the "group".

in a republic sovereignty is "singular"

That means that no matter how the democracy wants to vote you can still stand on your rights and get remedy as an individual.

in a democracy whatever the mob says goes and your individual rights are snuffed by the mob.


REPUBLIC vs. DEMOCRACY

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America,
and to the Republic for which it stands,
one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."


SUMMARY
In the Pledge of Allegiance we all pledge allegiance to our Republic, not to a democracy. "Republic" is the proper description of our government, not "democracy." I invite you to join me in raising public awareness regarding that distinction. A republic and a democracy are identical in every aspect except one. In a republic the sovereignty is in each individual person. In a democracy the sovereignty is in the group.

Republic. That form of government in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whome those powers are specially delegated. [NOTE: The word "people" may be either plural or singular. In a republic the group only has advisory powers; the sovereign individual is free to reject the majority group-think. USA/exception: if 100% of a jury convicts, then the individual loses sovereignty and is subject to group-think as in a democracy.]

Democracy. That form of government in which the sovereign power resides in and is exercised by the whole body of free citizens directly or indirectly through a system of representation, as distinguished from a monarchy, aristocracy, or oligarchy. [NOTE: In a pure democracy, 51% beats 49%. In other words, the minority has no rights. The minority only has those privileges granted by the dictatorship of the majority.]



The distinction between our Republic and a democracy is not an idle one. It has great legal significance. The Constitution guarantees to every state a Republican form of government (Art. 4, Sec. 4). No state may join the United States unless it is a Republic. Our Republic is one dedicated to "liberty and justice for all." Minority individual rights are the priority. The people have natural rights instead of civil rights.

The people are protected by the Bill of Rights from the majority. One vote in a jury can stop all of the majority from depriving any one of the people of his rights; this would not be so if the United States were a democracy. (see People's rights vs Citizens' rights) In a pure democracy 51 beats 49[%]. In a democracy there is no such thing as a significant minority: there are no minority rights except civil rights (privileges) granted by a condescending majority.

Only five of the U.S. Constitution's first ten amendments apply to Citizens of the United States. Simply stated, a democracy is a dictatorship of the majority. Socrates was executed by a democracy: though he harmed no one, the majority found him intolerable.

SOME DICTIONARY DEFINITIONS

Government. ....the government is but an agency of the state, distinguished as it must be in accurate thought from its scheme and machinery of government. ....In a colloquial sense, the United States or its representatives, considered as the prosecutor in a criminal action; as in the phrase, "the government objects to the witness." [Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, p. 625]

Government; Republican government. One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whome those powers are specially delegated. In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219; Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627. [Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, p. 626]

Democracy. That form of government in which the sovereign power resides in and is exercised by the whole body of free citizens directly or indirectly through a system of representation, as distinguished from a monarchy, aristocracy, or oligarchy. Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, pp. 388-389. Note: Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, can be found in any law library and most law offices.

COMMENTS Notice that in a Democracy, the sovereignty is in the whole body of the free citizens.

The sovereignty is not divided to smaller units such as individual citizens. To solve a problem, only the whole body politic is authorized to act. Also, being citizens, individuals have duties and obligations to the government. The government's only obligations to the citizens are those legislatively pre-defined for it by the whole body politic.

In a Republic, the sovereignty resides in the people themselves, whether one or many. In a Republic, one may act on his own or through his representatives as he chooses to solve a problem. Further, the people have no obligation to the government; instead, the government being hired by the people, is obliged to its owner, the people. The people own the government agencies.

The government agencies own the citizens. In the United States we have a three-tiered cast system consisting of people ---> government agencies ---> and citizens.

The people did "ordain and establish this Constitution," not for themselves, but "for the United States of America." In delegating powers to the government agencies the people gave up none of their own. (See Preamble of U.S. Constitution).

This adoption of this concept is why the U.S. has been called the "Great Experiment in self government." The People govern themselves, while their agents (government agencies) perform tasks listed in the Preamble for the benefit of the People. The experiment is to answer the question,

"Can self-governing people coexist and prevail over government agencies that have no authority over the People?" The citizens of the United States are totally subject to the laws of the United States (See 14th Amendment of U.S. Constitution).

NOTE: U.S. citizenship did not exist until July 28, 1868. Actually, the United States is a mixture of the two systems of government (Republican under Common Law, and democratic under statutory law). The People enjoy their God-given natural rights in the Republic.

In a democracy, the Citizens enjoy only government granted privileges (also known as civil rights). There was a great political division between two major philosophers, Hobbes and Locke. Hobbes was on the side of government. He believed that sovereignty was vested in the state.

Locke was on the side of the People. He believed that the fountain of sovereignty was the People of the state. Statists prefer Hobbes. Populists choose Locke.

In California, the Government Code sides with Locke.
Sections 11120 and 54950 both say,
"The people of this State do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them." The preambles of the U.S. and California Constitutions also affirm the choice of Locke by the People.

It is my hope that the U.S. will always remain a Republic, because I value individual freedom. Thomas Jefferson said that liberty and ignorance cannot coexist.* Will you help to preserve minority rights by fulfilling the promise in the Pledge of Allegiance to support the Republic? Will you help by raising public awareness of the difference between the Republic and a democracy?
* "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization,
it expects what never was and never will be."
Thomas Jefferson, 1816.








Moonhead -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 6:09:44 AM)

"Teachers today are like really ignorant."
O rlly?




Louve00 -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 6:18:25 AM)

I know the meaning of a democracy, republic, oligarchy and anarchy, thank you very much.  I also know the pledge of allegiance and that is how the conversation with one of my daughters counselors (not teachers) was brought about.  She insisted we are a democracy, and that is what they teach kids in school today.  But, its not true and accurate (us being a sole democracy), which is why I tried to discuss that with her.  As I said, we abide by law (a republican way), but we incorporate a vote (a democratic way), so the will of the people are represented in a lawful way. 

That is the best way I can deduce it all.




kdsub -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 6:33:01 AM)

I'm afraid you do sound like an elitists...That's ok there have been many of you over the years. Just another part of our group nature. You fail to see the world as it really is and assume that everyone should think like you if he or she were only smart enough to do it.

This is not a put down we are all elitists in one degree or another...it comes with being human.

Step back from your world...open your eyes to reality...see and understand the faults of mankind and your own. Then I believe you will realize this is not such a bad country or system, as systems go, in the history of man.

It has worked...yes really worked as no other system or country has in the past. With all its faults and warts it is the best we have come up with in our few millions of years of existence.

Strive for something better sure but don't look down on a system that has giving you a life of freedom and the ability to complain about it.

Butch




pahunkboy -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 6:34:34 AM)

LOL-  a river of blood is good for our wheat fields.




rulemylife -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 6:40:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

"Teachers today are like really ignorant."
O rlly?


Dude, like really, really, really...........fer sure.




kdsub -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 6:41:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

LOL-  a river of blood is good for our wheat fields.


And it tastes so good too...along with the smell of napalm in the morning.




TheHeretic -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 6:42:38 AM)

You're right. The vote should be restricted to people smart enough to use it properly. FirmhandKY and I will be the ones to write the test.

Happy now?




OrpheusAgonistes -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 7:05:41 AM)

I think it was Churchill who said something like, "Democracy is the worst form of government known to man, except for all the others."

My own impression of the American political culture is that it is daft, barbarous, willfully stupid and rotten to the core.  The road to reform would involve Americans being able to overcome their tribal instincts enough to see that the "us" and "them" isn't Democrats vs Republicans, it's kleptocrats (whichever party flag they fly) vs everybody else.  I'd bet a dollar things will just keep getting worse.

That said, I don't see a better solution than to try to work within the structure of a democratic republic.  The key is to instill some kind of respect and veneration for rational thought and intelligent discussion in as many people as possible.  To some degree, this answer begs your question.  You say "Do Americans deserve a democracy?"  I answer "They do if they can start to take their obligations in a democracy more seriously."  Candidly, I think this is the only solution.  I think the American experiment is probably worth continuing, which means everybody who takes it seriously has an obligation to be reasonably informed and reasonably reasonable.

That doesn't mean debates won't get heated.  There's the famous occasion on which, at some dinner or another, Hamilton had finally heard enough of Jefferson's nasally ejaculations about the "will of the people" and began to pound on the table yelling "Your people, sir, your people is a great beast!"  A generation's finest minds will not always be able to disagree civilly.  But I think any discussion of "the death of democracy" is really a discussion of "the death of discourse" and I think if people who disagree honestly reach the point at which they stop tweaking each other for the sake of tweaking each other and start listening to each other then something can be salvaged.  This will be a long, awkward process and it may even be doomed to failure, but it beats the alternatives.

One more nod to America's venerable ghosts--it was Franklin (old, somewhat doddering, drooling from the corners of his mouth but still a genius) who caustically remarked to nobody in particular "So you have a Republic....if you can keep it."




Real0ne -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 7:52:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

I know the meaning of a democracy, republic, oligarchy and anarchy, thank you very much.  I also know the pledge of allegiance and that is how the conversation with one of my daughters counselors (not teachers) was brought about.  She insisted we are a democracy, and that is what they teach kids in school today.  But, its not true and accurate (us being a sole democracy), which is why I tried to discuss that with her.  As I said, we abide by law (a republican way), but we incorporate a vote (a democratic way), so the will of the people are represented in a lawful way. 

That is the best way I can deduce it all.




print out that last post of mine and give it to her and if she still pushes it report her to the board.  If she cant get somethign as simple as that correct you fear what else she might be teaching your child.




Aneirin -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 8:20:16 AM)

The trouble with anything written down as a definition, is ; it is a definition amongst many, and the reader selects what they wish to believe. Even the changing to a better sounding adjectives can alter a meaning because there are many definitions of what that adjective is. Law works the same, it is why we need lawyers to give the articles and meaning to a definition in law. I believe we would be a whole lot better off, if we first gave an ultimate and complete stamped in law definition of what defines something and then we can work from that and take everything from one legal definition, whether it is found in later times to be right or wrong, we simply need a rock solid indestructable base line from which to work and there understand.If we don't have this base line, then we are open to all kinds of education and education which might not have political intent, but might simply be a person's received understanding. Even in our civilised society, we have chaos in the basic buiding blocks, so society and understanding is chaotic.




subtee -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 8:44:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

I'm having serious issues with the concept of democracy. What happens to rule by the people when the people are unfit to rule? Are democratically elected politicians supposed to lead the people, or are they supposed to represent the will of the people?
[snip]


They represent us when they do what we want. They are leaders when we want to place blame for outcomes.




FirmhandKY -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 9:01:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

You're right. The vote should be restricted to people smart enough to use it properly. FirmhandKY and I will be the ones to write the test.

Happy now?


I'm working on a mathematical formula to explain it all.

Some of the factors involved:

TP = Total Population
VP = Voting Population
VP/TP = Concentration of Political Power  (CnP)
C = Net Contributors to government/society coffers.
R = Net Receivers from government/society coffers.
X = Point along the Political Spectrum

Political/Societal Spectrum: Tyranny->Oligarchy ->Republicanism ->Democracy->Oligarchy->Tyranny

The thesis:

The greater the Concentration of Political Power rests with Net Takers, the farther on the left on the chart a government/society lays.  The greater the Concentration of Power rests with the Net Contributors, the further to the right on the chart a government/society lays.  A healthy government/society balances the two somewhere between ""Republicanism" and "Democracy".

Unfortunately, I won't have the time to finish it in the next couple of days, but I post it here for the intellectual enjoyment "of the masses".  [8D][:D]

So enjoy. [:)]

Understanding the mathematical equation, along with the ability to solve for "X" will be a requirement for citizenship.

Firm




rulemylife -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 9:09:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

Law works the same, it is why we need lawyers to give the articles and meaning to a definition in law. I believe we would be a whole lot better off, if we first gave an ultimate and complete stamped in law definition of what defines something and then we can work from that and take everything from one legal definition, whether it is found in later times to be right or wrong, we simply need a rock solid indestructable base line from which to work and there understand.If we don't have this base line, then we are open to all kinds of education and education which might not have political intent, but might simply be a person's received understandingl


How do you propose to do that?

The reason we have legal disputes, and other disputes for that matter, is that the interpretation of what is written and said varies from person to person.




rulemylife -> RE: Democracy y/n? (5/11/2010 9:14:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

You're right. The vote should be restricted to people smart enough to use it properly. FirmhandKY and I will be the ones to write the test.

Happy now?


I would have thought you two would be the first to be restricted.

But that's just my humble opinion.

[sm=rofl.gif]






Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875