RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


VaguelyCurious -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 1:02:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika


quote:

ORIGINAL: WyldHrt

That's why you lubs me, LA [:D]


Indeed!

- LA



Ahem:

Madame Luxuriantly Lovely Legs over there might only lubs you for your proofreading abilities, but I would lubs (?) you *even if you couldn't proofread for toffee*.

Juuuust putting that out there [:D]

(Not that I disagree with the Luxuriant one-paragraphing is sexy :P)




WyldHrt -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 1:10:58 AM)

quote:

Ahem:
Madame Luxuriantly Lovely Legs over there might only lubs you for your proofreading abilities, but I would lubs (?) you *even if you couldn't proofread for toffee*.
Juuuust putting that out there [:D]
(Not that I disagree with the Luxuriant one-paragraphing is sexy :P)

Gets a warm fuzzy, even though VC has already been claimed (multiple times) in another thread.
*Smooches the Curious one* [:D] Thanks for making my night!




VaguelyCurious -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 1:22:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WyldHrt

Gets a warm fuzzy, even though VC has already been claimed (multiple times) in another thread.
*Smooches the Curious one* [:D] Thanks for making my night!
Wha? I've been claimed?

*Smooches the Purty Eyed Lady right back*. Is the night young or old? I can never remember the time difference...




lobodomslavery -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 3:12:47 AM)

im with the OP 110% it s absolutely dreadful to be subjected to time wasters. They should be exterminated from the lifestyle. Unfortunately the internet is full of them. They are a curse
kevin




jbcurious -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 3:25:14 AM)

What an arrogant bitch.

That's all I have to say.[:)]




myotherself -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 3:52:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lobodomslavery

im with the OP 110% it s absolutely dreadful to be subjected to time wasters. They should be exterminated from the lifestyle. Unfortunately the internet is full of them. They are a curse
kevin



They are indeed....[8|]




GreedyTop -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 4:07:47 AM)

*bites tongue*




sirsholly -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 4:28:36 AM)

*severs tongue*




GreedyTop -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 4:36:20 AM)

HOLLY!!  dammit, doesnt Jim have ENOUGH to deal with without you doing that?? LOL




sirsholly -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 4:40:02 AM)

my tongue was the only part that wasn't injured. I didn't want it to feel left out.

HollyWithTheHappyTongue




GreedyTop -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 4:44:58 AM)

*hugs* I hope you all are doing (as well as can be expected )




sirsholly -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 4:45:56 AM)

Backatcha, Baby!!!![:)]




Phoenixpower -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 4:50:57 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WyldHrt

OK, I couldn't stand it. Just for you, OP.... paragraphs!
quote:

I will never truly understand the motivations and mentality of the timewaster. This would bother me more if I actually cared about the internal life of this lowest of creatures. My botherment is effectively confined to the annoyance these fakes cause me personally and the corrosive, stifling and antisocial effect they have upon the scene itself.

It is because of their childish games that one has to make genuine candidates jump through tedious hoops to authenticate themselves; meaning that, prior to the BDSM activities all genuine people are here for, one has to extend the chatty, vanilla aspects of the interview process in order to establish said candidate is worth one's time and effort. This can often spoil or delay the excitement and devil-may-care aspect that I personally value in BDSM. My ideal preference would be for would-be slaves to come here, yoked, hooded and serving, within a second of their expressed interest to do so; as I find no fascination in on-line exchanges for their own sake whatsoever.

The fake who professes an interest in real-time but knows, secretly, that s/he does not have it in her/him presumably gets satisfaction from such things as Yahoo Messenger and email. Such sad cases, I assume, being incapable of anything beyond these methods of contact with real-life scene-people have converted their limitation into some kind of virtue; which might occupy them on some otherwise empty, boring afternoon or late-evening, whilst their vanilla partner is out or is sleeping. This is something like phantom-limb-syndrome, I suppose: not as good as an actual limb, but mildly better than facing up to the fact that there is nothing physically there!

The timewaster's frankly desparate and laughably inane deceptions might well kill some time for those lacking imagination and the courage and ability to realise their supposed 'dreams' in actuality. These worms might well even claim for themselves some kind of practical victory, as they string the genuine along - just long enough to gather two or three messages from a real person, perhaps even a ten-minute chatroom encounter. Wank fodder comes in all shapes and sizes, I suppose; and those who have never tasted genuine experiences are likely to be most adept at making do with what others would barely notice. Imagine - One's most treasured scene artifacts, a few emails exchanged here! What memories, eh?!

But the wider reality is this: You, timewaster, are as welcome as and as attractive as cancer. On the one hand, you are simply in need of some ruthless, disinterested cure; a piece of clever software to weed you out with a click of the mouse. That would be lovely, I have to say. On the other hand, and until then, we genuine ones can only hope that you suffer many dark, existential moments of dreadful, fatal loneliness and shame; that, when looking in the mirror, you see yourself for the low-life and parasite you really are - in actuality, as an apt judgement on your personal value.

For my own part, when I spot a fake or a timewaster, according to my mood, I either immediately block that person or I have some fun myself, stringing that person along in turn if it amuses me. The latter option is simplicity itself given the poor intellectual level of such creatures; and one can quickly tie them in mental knots with the most basic games and playes upon concept; meaning that they leave the fray annoyed and unfulfilled. In each and every case, I circulate her/his name amongst my friends and associates; and we chuckle as we compare notes.

Ugh, that was 5 minutes of my life that I will never get back [:'(]




thank you soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much WyldHrt, now even I have a chance to read it [:)]




lobodomslavery -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 4:53:03 AM)

Well its good that You agree with me. A timewaster who promises to tribute or serve a lady and then backs out is a wanker. Someone though who just participates in the forums is not a timewaster. They are not promising anything so they cannot be accused of anything in return. They are simply conversationalists or controversy generators if you wish, but everyone likes a good rascal , a good scandal and a good natter. we could not get through the week without it. My conscience is completely clear . When i was in service to a Lady i did tribute as promised. Now that i am no longer in service to anyone, i no longer have any attachments so my function is purely board participation
kevin




Phoenixpower -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 4:56:27 AM)

Hmmmm....still didnt make it any more interesting [&o] but at least I know now what OP said [&o] though IMO that's what the journal could be used for instead, but then of course it wouldn't receive the attention she is craving for [8|]




sirsholly -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 4:56:55 AM)

quote:

They are simply conversationalists or controversy generators if you wish, but everyone likes a good rascal , a good scandal and a good natter. we could not get through the week without it.
wanna bet? 




DarkSteven -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 4:58:46 AM)

OP, your basic whine was that you are forced to spend time getting to know people before you play with them. 

Ain't life a bitch sometimes?  If the two of you aren't compatible, then you have to move on.  If you call that timewasting...




LadyAngelika -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 5:28:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika


quote:

ORIGINAL: WyldHrt

That's why you lubs me, LA [:D]


Indeed!

- LA



Ahem:

Madame Luxuriantly Lovely Legs over there might only lubs you for your proofreading abilities, but I would lubs (?) you *even if you couldn't proofread for toffee*.

Juuuust putting that out there [:D]

(Not that I disagree with the Luxuriant one-paragraphing is sexy :P)



Be careful WyldHrt, VC admitted in another thread recently that she is a master at fake charm!

And for the record, VC, in this instance, the reason why I "lubbed" (?) Wyld was for being a masochist. But do not be fooled!! I adore her for so many more reasons. ;-)

As I do you, you competitive sneak! ;-)

- LA




LadyAngelika -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 5:34:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

OP, your basic whine was that you are forced to spend time getting to know people before you play with them. 

Ain't life a bitch sometimes?  If the two of you aren't compatible, then you have to move on.  If you call that timewasting...



Steven, don't you be a masochist too and try to reason with the OP. That's not just a chip on her shoulder, that's the whole potato!

- LA




lobodomslavery -> RE: Thoughts about fakes & timewasters (5/15/2010 6:04:54 AM)

The main difficulty is the lack of the fairness in society. Take Ireland and leave BDSM completely out of it, 250 individuals share 40 billion euro between them, the government need to take 4 billion euro out of the economy next budget to repair the finances, by taking 10% of their wealth they would have the 4 billion, will they do it, no, will it matter if they did it to the 250 wealthy individuals , not a jot, what will they do instead, screw the ordinary worker on salary of 20,000-100,000 let's say, ordinary low to middle income worker and people wonder why ordinary folk are so angry, that little snapshot will give you an inkling
kevin




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125