|
Real0ne -> RE: Guilty Verdict in Obama Trial (5/22/2010 10:16:23 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Nope. Neither would a Physician based soley upon his notes.
An admission record is just that, a record of admissions. No one would dispute a hospitals admission secretary without proof to the contrary.
The record would not be contestable if all the requirements are met. In order for those notes, the L&D notes of live birth, to be contested, it would have to be proven that on August 4, 1961, the full nursing staffon duty at the time and those nurses who followed until discharge of the baby, were conspiring with each other to commit an act of medical fraud. At which time, it would also have to be proven that insurance fraud was committed, if insurance payments were accepted. Also that the hospital medical records and admission department also committed and were in conspiracy with the nursing staff to committ major medical fraud.
The L&D log of live births is just another in a paper trail. Yet, so tightly is it constructed that fraud, especially years and years later, is impossible.
well they would have to have all the scheduling records etc and that would support your log prima facia, I agree. I could see that in and of itself holding up as long as there was not a preponderance of evidence on the other side.
Now in barrys case its not all that simple but he cannot seem to come up with anything but guv records but nothing to support the creation of the guv records. Only the rest of america has those requirements if its challenged.
|
|
|
|
