leadership527
Posts: 5026
Joined: 6/2/2008 Status: offline
|
I would say that this model is a weird perspective on what Carol and I do. It's not quite right... but it's not totally wrong either. Carol and I are both enslaved (if you want to think of it that way) to the collective "us". I expect the same sort of obedience to that "us" from myself as I do from Carol. She has substantive input into that will of the "us". Granted, it is me who is sorting out the various thoughts of "us" and coming to a final end-state answer, but I do so impartially. Beyond that, Carol is currently ahead one "anything" bet (yeah, we bet "anythings" with each other). She could certainly use that bet to accomplish... well... anything. Beyond that, Carol specifically gets "master" status (again, if you want to think of it that way) in any area in which it seems prudent to do so. For instance, I'm currently stopping smoking. If I felt for whatever reason that I really, really needed a cigarette today, I'd ask her and it would be her answer which was final. In my mind, it just makes no sense to have the addict making such decisions. As I said, the model proposed is not what we do... but it kind of is when I squint my eyes a bit. The whole "I make all the decisions" model is just too simplistic to describe our relationship. It's good enough in broad brush strokes, but when examined with more detail, it isn't that simple.
_____________________________
~Jeff I didn't so much "enslave" Carol as I did "enlove" her. - Me I want a joyous, loving, respectful relationship where the male is in charge and deserves to be. - DavanKael
|