Rule
Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BossyShoeBitch But to me, here in this place, you could be describing yourself right now. That is okay. I am not here to convince you or anyone of anything. quote:
ORIGINAL: BossyShoeBitch I am genuinely curious as to why you seem convinced that you are right. It seems to me that if just 1 male person is happy and grateful that he has no foreskin, then you cannot correctly speak in the absolute way you have been doing. That would be rather arrogant, don't you think? What is arrogant? I am a supergenius and I excel in solving problems conceptually that normal people take decades if not centuries to solve. Does that make me extraordinary? Yes. Is it a reason to be arrogant? That depends on the person. Let me retell you a tale. Once in China there was a marvelous archer. Everybody admired him, except for one seller of oil. When asked why he was not impressed, he answered: "Everybody has a talent. That is not remarkable." "Then what talent do you have?" they challenged him. He answered: "I can pour a whole can of oil through a hole the size of a pinprick without the oil touching the rim of the pinprick." They did not believe him and demanded a demonstration - and he showed them the truth of his words. Everyone has a talent. I know mine. Why should I deny having this talent? My talent defines me. If I denied my own talent, I might as well commit suicide. This is not about me being arrogant, but about a few people having a problem with accepting that other people have talents that they themselves lack. quote:
ORIGINAL: BossyShoeBitch It seems to me that if just 1 male person is happy and grateful that he has no foreskin, then you cannot correctly speak in the absolute way you have been doing. I am sure that there are plenty of happy amputees, whether they have had an eye gouged out or a finger, toe or leg or molar or appendix or foreskin removed. In fact if they all got infused with happy juice or happy smoke, I expect that nearly all amputees would be happy. What singles out populations with foreskin amputees for me, is that after a number of generations their incidence of inherited genetic diseases becomes six times as high qua percentage than in indigenous non-circumcised European Christian populations. As well as that such populations start drowning their adulterous females in wells, slitting their throat, put them on fire until they die, throw stones at them until they die, bury them alive and more of such murderous atrocities. I do not think that babies that are born with inherited diseases are happy. I do not think that females that are murdered in this way are happy. Do you? Such negative effects do not occur as a consequence of amputating other organs. They do occur in populations that circumcise their males, though. And they will occur in the USA if the people of the USA for a number of generations persist in the misguided circumcision of their males. quote:
ORIGINAL: BossyShoeBitch Why is it that you are under the impression that you get to decide whose opinion is valid? Maybe today it's my turn to decide. Decide away. You might be right. Deciding what is or may be truth is part of my talent. It does require some knowledge, though, and if possible some kind(s) of confirmation.
< Message edited by Rule -- 5/26/2010 4:11:12 PM >
|