SocratesNot
Posts: 812
Joined: 5/17/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
For the most part, I agree with my evil counterpart... ignoring it. However, if I feel strongly enough about it, then the right thing to do is to try to convince enough other people that it is wrong also. If enough other people agree with me, then a law is passed and the thing becomes illegal. Some how or the other, all us humans need to get along. To use an extreme example, I feel pretty strongly that barbecuing babies is unacceptable and wrong. I really don't give a crap whether my neighbors have deeply seated religious convictions and for THEM it is a positive and affirming thing. Conveniently, lots of other people agree with me so it is prohibited by law. And I would absolutely call the cops. This is a rare example where I agree with you SocratesNot. The BDSM community likes to bandy about tolerance as if it were some sort of panacea to all social conflict and it is not. At some point, things become intolerable. What that point is will vary from individual to individual and item to item. When that point is passed, then there are recourses as there must be. Anything else would be anarchy and us humans demonstrably do not like living in anarchies. In a slightly more realistic example (and I stress "slightly" here), it is conceivable in my mind that it would come to my attention that my neighbors were engaging in some BDSM practice that I found intolerable. I want to stress here that we'd be talking about something that, at least in my mind, was not subject to debate. Given my tolerances, I'm pretty sure such a thing would also be blatantly and highly illegal. But all the same, I have an active imagination and I can imagine such things. And unlike the preponderance of collarme, I absolutely assert that it is my right and obligation to act in such a circumstance. In the end, it will be up to the courts to sort it out. By definition, if the courts were to find the defendant guilty, then I am not infringing on their rights. It is NOBODY's right to live in a society and ignore the laws. So... to SocratesNot's dismay with my relationship. Yes. If he were to find what I do so intolerable that you morally must take action, then I encourage him to do so. Honor is not preserved by inaction. I must agree completely with this post. When it comes to me taking action against you, I must admit that at this moment I don't have enough information to say that you are guilty of anything, especially because I haven't communicated with Carol about your relationship. But if I had insider information and still hold opinion that your relationship is abhorrent (which I don't think, I just think it is very risky), I would take your advice and act upon my convictions.
|