porcelaine -> RE: An interesting theory of D/s (my own) (5/26/2010 12:04:48 PM)
|
leadership527, quote:
Yes, this is what fools think. I'm not one of them. I said quite specifically that I may assess absolutely nothing wrong with the submission... it may come with a great deal of strength and integrity, it may be driven by motives which are laudable by own values. In short, I may approve of it in every possible way. . I don't think you're in the same boat. I believe you know that much about me. However, the idea is bounced around without the sound reasoning you've provided. To the degree that many question that part of themselves. We're speaking straightforward here and even though you're not guilty of doing the same that doesn't mean others exhibit the same maturity. quote:
*nods* In the end, it is things like commitment, integrity, strength, compassion, etc. that will determine the quality of that which is offered -- on both sides of the kneel. I agree. quote:
Heh, yes. I agree. Semi-dominant personalities are threatened such a thing. If you knew more about my background, you'd know that it's laughable to think I would be bothered by it. I would never entertain your company if I believed you fell into that camp. Seriously. :) quote:
Again, you are misreading me. I quite specifically said (and said again above), that it all may be quite laudable. But truly, aren't I allowed to prefer vanilla and you chocolate without a debate on which is "better"? Of course you are. We're not debating better. All three are noteworthy in my mind. It depends what the dominant is seeking. Your comment was about those with submission orientations, something I identify with. That's why I posed the question. quote:
That still doesn't change my preference though. Of course, as I noted, what undoubtedly WOULD change my preference is falling in love with a girl like you who is in the "by orientation" camp. You know me and preferences. I'm all for them. If you asked I'd say the orientation is a layer. Give me a man that digs to the bones instead. Who is she beyond all that stuff? quote:
Which STILL doesn't change the fact that in the here and now, the "by orientation" submissives don't generate "domly urges" in me. At this very moment in time, I do not resonate with them. I get where you're coming from. There are dominant types that don't resonate with me as well. I think that's true for most. ~porcelaine
|
|
|
|