RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


BitaTruble -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/26/2010 8:53:18 PM)



quote:

I wept when I was told I would no longer be called Charlote, and was given a new name. Not a boohoo is me weeping, but a soul wrenching, heartbroken expression of my perceived loss of identity. I hated the name and the very concept of being renamed. Before I experienced the unexpected visceral reaction, I would have scoffed at anyone who said they cried over something so "silly."


quote:

I also have a visceral and not positive reaction about this.


Completely understandable. You have spent your whole life being inundated by friends, family, media etc., to think in a certain way utlizing a standard imposed upon you by society. Many of us who have been doing this sort of thing for a while went through similiar or the same sort of reactions. You'll get over it as you strip away the parts of you which have been implanted by the bombardment and get to the core of who you really are and actually start walking the path you are meant to walk to maximize your potential .. or, you won't. Up to you actually. The *why* of your reaction is much less important than the *what* as in.. what are you going to do about it?


quote:

I would like to ask some questions about TPE.

I also have a visceral reaction about words "slave" and "property".
D/s is OK, being someone submissive is OK, kinky scenes are OK, hard beatings are OK as long as there is no permanent harm.

But, can someone honestly tell me, can being a literal "slave" and "property" without personal identity actually be healthy for anyone?


It's not healthy for just *anyone*. It's healthy for those whom in seeking and finding the truth of themselves and their natures have found it the way they should live in order to live freely as their nature intended and dictates they should. You might never understand it, but if you keep an open mind, you may learn to accept that others are happy and perfectly well-adjusted in choosing to live their authentic selves as slaves, property or owners. Don't get too hung up on labels at this point. They are merely the beginning of communication not the end all be all of definition. Think of labels as starting points and that may help curb some of that knee-jerk reaction to them.


quote:

I am not concerned about physical aspects of this, because in many TPE relationships there isn't very much sadomasochistic elements at all.
What worries me are psychological risks of that.


Fair enough. There are plenty of folks who really don't have their shit together and one can show compassion and concern for those folks. Just make sure that you are quite accurate and have your own shit together before you call them out on it because, you know, you could be incorrect in your assessements if you are not face-to-face and toes-to-toes living in their shoes.

quote:

The word "slave", no matter how erotic it can be, is an ugly word for me. It has so many negative connotations, that I can not like it.


That used to be called a *hang-up*. Not sure what the new lingo would call it these days, but, that's something you'll either get over or learn to accept as your own personal issue. If it's ugly to yo, that's okay. You don't have to like everything. The buffet has plenty of other dishes from which to choose.


quote:

The same thing I feel about the word "property".
When something is your property you have all the rights to use it and abuse it in any ways, and also to destroy it.
Using the word "property" to describe a human being does not feel good for me.


I would suggest that if you feel that strongly about a word in a given context, you refrain from using it. You have neither the power nor the authority to prevent others from using it however they may desire. Again, it's a label. You see the label, you knee-jerk. As a slave *their* definition and, perhaps, gain some enlightment on the subject. You may change your opinion, you may not, but you'll at least get some diverse input from which to draw more accurate conclusions.

quote:

But the words are not important. What is important are the feelings of mutual fulfillment that Masters and slaves have in such relationships.


You can say that and when you believe it, maybe the knee-jerk reaction to those words will stop.

quote:

I am mainly talking about maledom relationships now, but some things can apply to femdom relationships as well.
That being said LNT said, that she is SURE that her primary submissive partner would kill himself if she wanted this.
Can it be in any way healthy? She said that being loyal to her is more important to her partner than being alive.
Really, can this be healthy?


Dead slaves don't provide much entertainment value to their owners nor are they of much use. Can living life assured that you have absolute loyalty and devotion from your slave be healthy? Certainly. Why wouldn't it be? I promise you, there isn't a dominant on this board who is going to kill their slave or have their slave kill themself just to *prove* that loyalty. It's nonsensical and best as shock value to scare away people who don't have the gumption or foresight to realize that while *it could* happen it clearly defeats the purpose of getting your slave trained to practical perfection only to discard of them in such a casual and frivilous manner. Contrary to popular belief, most dominants actually *like* their slaves/property and want to keep them around plus, they just aren't going to risk going to prison. There are, of course, notable exceptions, but it's usually because of some crazy muther who the submissive/slave/property didn't actually take the time necessary to get to know. Charlie Manson is in jail and most of the rest of us are doing okay with sane partners and stable relationships. Once you get to the point that you are willing to die for someone else, chances are you have some time under your belt in your relationship, your in the military or you're a parent.


quote:

People keep telling me that slaves have no issues with self esteem whatsoever, or even if they have it, not more than anyone else.


Gross generalization, perhaps not entirely accurate but close enough that it's not worth getting nit-picky over. People are people no matter where you go. Some good, some not so good and I highly suspect very few people on the planet haven't had their moments of doubt and insecurity in some area or another regardless of which side of the kneel they lay their claim. Adults cope.



quote:

However, I am really puzzled with someone being willing to takes his life in order to please the Domme. If he values his life so little, how can he value himself?


Why make the assumption that he hates his life or holds it of little value? Seems to me that pretty much the opposite is true. He holds great value to his life, finds it precious and offers it as the ultimate sacrifice should such be required. Who would do that except for someone who has found their partner to be ultimately worthy of such a thing? Perspective is a wonderous thing.


quote:

My logic tells me that such person actually values himself and his entire life less than just one aspect of the Domme, and this is her pleasure.


Such devotion doesn't come from logic! No wonder you can't wrap your head around it. Step outside the box for just a moment. Imagine that you have found someone so incredible that they are the very reason you breath.. they literally take your breath away just being in their presence. Now, imagine you are the object of that sort of devotion. Seriously, you going to put a cap in the ass of the most loyal person on the planet to you.. the one who would die for you just for some whim or momentary pleasure? Most adults do have a few brain cells rubbing together especially the ones who can inspire that sort of loyalty in a fellow human and won't cut off their nose to spite their face. Drop the *literal* notch down a peg or two and keep it to planet Earth and you'll do okay.

quote:

For him it is better to be dead and have pleased Mistress, than to be alive, both he and his Mistress, while she is not so pleased.


Well, we'll just take this in baby steps for now. Absorb what I wrote above than come back and reread what you wrote.

quote:

But still, if someone is really a slave, internally enslaved, owned and deprived of personal identity, how dependent she becomes on her Master?


Everywhere from slightly to extraordinairly dependent. It really depends upon to many diverse factors to break it down more than that including personality, lifestyle, finances, sexuality.. too many things to list, really. Definitely one of those individual case-by-case things.

quote:

What happens if Master dies? This is very likely to happen for two reasons:
first, women live longer
second, Master is usually quite older than slave.


Adapt, accept or die.. same as in other other sort of relationship. Some will go to pieces and never recover, others will heal in their time. Who's to say?

quote:

I have read the thread about a woman unable to orgasm on her own after leaving M/s relationship, because she needed permission.
When the Master release her or dies, how much of personal strength, power, identity and ability to cope has really remained in slave?


Depends on many factors. If it is someone older, they may be fine with living their life with the memories.. some one younger may be more resilient and in time desire another relationship and seek such out and the exact reverse could be true. Again, who is to say? If you don't know, you just don't know and speaking in abstracts really isn't going to resolve the issue. It's too general.


quote:

In my opinion the biggest problem with internal enslavement is that slaves become too dependent on their masters.


You are certainly entitled to hold such an opinion as long as you understand exactly how much value it has to a relationship to which you are not a party which means pretty much zilch.

quote:

So if Master owns WHOLE slave (which Jeff said that this is his goal) how much of her being is left to her?


All of her, of course! Stripped down to her core, exposed and raw.. he wants *her* and not someone else or he wouldn't be with *her* .. so what is the point of not having her, in fact, pretty much insisting on her being exactly who she is.. that's the one he wanted after all! You don't go out and get a poodle when you really want a collie.. and if you do, then that's sorta dumb. That's not to say that a Master won't hone and tweak and help someone realize their potential, but it's so much easier to start with a lot of factors you desire already in place otherwise you are just going to end up *replacing* someone who isn't tweaking to your satisfaction.


quote:

Would her life have any sense at all if the Master died or left her?


Maybe, maybe not. Is it somehow different outside of M/s relationships? Do not vanilla men and woman go to pieces or hold it together and cope, too? It is, ultimately, relationships between the people involved to either denigrate or evolve depending on how involved the parties are in making it work. Some people who sit in the big chair are going to insist their slaves/property be well-equipped to cope in the event of such a life change .. others won't give it a second thought and their partner will be left to flounder and it does not much matter if you wear a collar, hold a leash, wear a wedding ring.. some folks prep for later, some don't. It's a people thing, not a M/s thing.

quote:

I tend to believe that in order to be healthy every person must have some personal strength within.


Most adults do but it's not universal by any stretch of the imagination.


quote:

That's why I am extremely afraid of relationships such as TPE or internal enslavement, despite all of its positive sides.


Try not to live in fear. You have the absolutely ability to choose to live your life in a style which suits you. If TPE isn't it, that's okay.. find what works and live your authentic self and it's all good.

quote:

Could someone enlighten me about this very hard topic?


Anything is possible. How open are you to be enlightened? What is your goal in seeking such enlightenment? Lastly, why should someone else use their valuable time on trying to help you attain new knowledge? Are you going to go forth and do good works with it? ;)

quote:

I really DON'T KNOW THE FUCK ABOUT ALL THESE THINGS SO DON'T BE OFFENDED BY THE QUESTIONS OF THIS IGNORANT ASSHOLE.
Instead if someone is willing to REALLY enlighten me I would appreciate it very, very, very much.



Personally, I wasn't offended by your questions. I was a bit confused as to how this ended up in P&RS. It seems a fairly weighty topic with the potential for good discussion but, I'm not a mod so what the hell do I know?

edit: Ugh.. I hate screwing up the quoting function




littlewonder -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/26/2010 8:54:07 PM)

[8|]

Ya know you really do make things more complicated than they really are.




porcelaine -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/26/2010 8:59:59 PM)

SocratesNot,

quote:

I don't know about others, but for me this is abso-fucking-horrendously frightening. I am not claustrophobic, but being put in any situation that I can not leave would make me this way.


Some people enjoy exceedingly tight spaces.

quote:

Being really, I mean REALLY unable to leave would be for me a hell on its own, even if everything else was perfect. I tend to think that she can leave as long as she is physically capable of running away (not being tied and having healthy legs). The possibility that there is a mental block so strong that would prevent her to leave in any situation makes me very afraid.


You act as if this idea is something new? People stay in relationships all the time that aren't good for them and they don't have a power exchange. It's called choice. And you're forgetting one very important factor. You are not a slave. None of this will ever make sense in your head. You don't possess the hunger within to endure it.

Her inability to leave is part of her mental conditioning. It keeps her tethered. Rather close in all honesty.

quote:

This must be extremely, really extremely careful decision. And this is not the only decision. Even more important decision is whether or not to became enslaved at all, and if there is not some deep primal need in her to do so, I would suggest not to do it


I hate to break it to you. People make poor relationship choices all the time. You'd think more energy would be expended on making a good selection given the risks, but alas that isn't always the case.

quote:

It simply can be that even if the man is OK, her personality can not endure being in slavery. And most of people would not be able to endure it. So she must be ABSOLUTELY SURE THAT SHE BELONGS TO EXTREMELY SMALL MINORITY OF PEOPLE WHO ARE ABLE TO ENDURE IT.


I don't know how to respond to that in a politically correct fashion. I will say that the idea of what a slave entails has morphed into something I barely recognize. Watered down is a common statement. I view it from a different perspective that encompasses her whole person. I see a lot of women that exhibit behaviors that would leave me to wonder who's on the kneel. However, I cannot judge them because their actions are accepted by the dominant. I digress. And I'm not speaking of lapses in the agreed upon behavior. But a promotion of a way of being that just blows me away. This new breed could stand a huge dose of polish and a very large binky.

quote:

Not even ability to endure it is enough reason. Apart from this she must need such relationship as she needs air. In all the other cases it's better not to enter such relationship.


It is an inescapable reality that I've come to accept. It won't go away and I can't silence it either. Need is a strong word. I will say I derive untold joy in that place that I cannot glean from anything else.

~porcelaine




xxblushesxx -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/26/2010 9:09:57 PM)

I also don't understand why this was moved here.

As far as the slave never being allowed to leave or make any other decisions ever again; in my mind that's hyperbole.

Consider this situation: The slave is told no matter what, do not leave the house today without my express permission. The slave is looking after Master's 85 year old mother who suddenly starts gasping for air and turning purple. Does slave hurry up and track master down and ask for permission to leave, or does slave rush master's dear mama to the hospital?

Or slave becomes entangled with an evil master. One who beats said slave, (not in a delicious fun way) lies and does other dastardly things effecting slave's children. Is slave bound forever to stay in this relationship because slave gave his/her word? There are purist who would argue yes but they will be continually shot down by the law in the country they live in. (more than likely) There are some who would say that the "master" violated the agreement so therefore the agreement is null and void. And there are many such as myself that believe that even an "internally enslaved" person has to have personal responsibility for his/herself, and his/her responsibilities.




WyldHrt -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/26/2010 9:25:17 PM)

quote:

I don't know about others, but for me this is abso-fucking-horrendously frightening. I am not claustrophobic, but being put in any situation that I can not leave would make me this way. However Wolf2Bear's experience seems to contradict it. He says that he left increadibly bad TPE relationship.

And again, you are confusing IE with TPE. They are not the same thing.
quote:

Being really, I mean REALLY unable to leave would be for me a hell on its own, even if everything else was perfect. I tend to think that she can leave as long as she is physically capable of running away (not being tied and having healthy legs). The possibility that there is a mental block so strong that would prevent her to leave in any situation makes me very afraid.

Which is fine.... for you. Others choose a different path.
quote:

And I agree with you ABSOLUTELY about one thing and this is:
quote:

Which brings us back to her most important decision of all - the man she chooses to serve.

This must be extremely, really extremely careful decision. And this is not the only decision. Even more important decision is
whether or not to became enslaved at all, and if there is not some deep primal need in her to do so, I would suggest not to do it

Why? Because, things going wrong don't have to be caused by the man at all. It simply can be that even if the man is OK, her personality can not endure being in slavery.
And most of people would not be able to endure it.
So she must be ABSOLUTELY SURE THAT SHE BELONGS TO EXTREMELY SMALL MINORITY OF PEOPLE WHO ARE ABLE TO ENDURE IT.

Not even ability to endure it is enough reason. Apart from this she must need such relationship as she needs air. In all the other cases it's better not to enter such relationship.

It has been pointed out to you again and again (and you have even admitted) that you don't know what you are talking about here. Screaming in capital letters or using a bold red or huge font doesn't change that.
Stop posting, start reading, and for the love of anything and everything 'holy', stop trying to shove human beings into your neatly labeled, preconceived little boxes.




SocratesNot -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/26/2010 9:38:32 PM)

Thank you for all responses, I especially appreciate BitaTruble's attempt to answer all my questions honestly.

xxblushesxx

I also think this is a hyperbole. And maybe even somewhat based on fantasy. The reality of internally enslaved slaves on this boards voicing their independent opinions makes me hope that what you said is true. I don't know if someone will want to disagree.
However there is another thing I am afraid of, and this is the possibility of brainwashing. Porcelaine's answers seemed so confident, consistent and stiff that I can imagine that she is brainwashed to answer in such fashion. I don't actually see a lot of mental processes being involved in her answers. She answers them so easily and confidently, as if she know them by heart. And there is another thing. Many slaves mentioned that one aspect of internal enslavement is accepting commands without thinking. I really tend to think that suppression of thought is unhealthy, if for no other reason, then simply because the brain that is not active deteriorates.
I really hope there is some fantasy and hyperbole involved in all these things.
If this is really real 100% real as described, this is for me not only thing that I wouldn't be comfortable being in, but also the thing that I wouldn't wish anyone to be in, not even my enemies.
Also, I find it extremely scary to influence someone's religious beliefs. Porcelaine stated that any religious beliefs that are non compatible with Master, will be removed or put aside. For many people religion is extremely important part of who they are. Even touching this sensitive area is extremely risky and disrespectful to them. Just my opinion.

BitaTruble I would like you to give a second though on this:
quote:


So if Master owns WHOLE slave (which Jeff said that this is his goal) how much of her being is left to her?

All of her, of course! Stripped down to her core, exposed and raw.. he wants *her* and not someone else or he wouldn't be with *her* .. so what is the point of not having her, in fact, pretty much insisting on her being exactly who she is.. that's the one he wanted after all! You don't go out and get a poodle when you really want a collie.. and if you do, then that's sorta dumb. That's not to say that a Master won't hone and tweak and help someone realize their potential, but it's so much easier to start with a lot of factors you desire already in place otherwise you are just going to end up *replacing* someone who isn't tweaking to your satisfaction.


I don't think this is the case. Jeff said how by owning whole slave, he actually wanted all of the aspects of her to be under his control. So he dictates her hair color, what will she it, what will she drink, who will she be friend with, even what will she think. I can't grasp how anything of her is actually left to herself. He can change her completely, make a new person, a new personality, with new value system. For me it seems that not much of her old self remained intact, if anything.





porcelaine -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/26/2010 10:10:35 PM)

SocratesNot,

Let me be clear about something from the start. I have never been a victim of domestic violence in any way. Nor do I support relationships where it takes place. Even those that may have begun with a mutual exchange in place. Having said this, you have wacky people on both sides of the paddle. Not everyone that presents themselves as dominant is worth serving nor is every submissive worth owning. We should each do our homework when selecting a mate. Bad things can and do happen when you skimp or ignore glaring signs of instability.

Switching gears...

quote:

However there is another thing I am afraid of, and this is the possibility of brainwashing. Porcelaine's answers seemed so confident, consistent and stiff that I can imagine that she is brainwashed to answer in such fashion.


You deciphered all these things from the comfort of your screen. The same place that has given you extensive foresight into the realm of BDSM and its inner workings.

quote:

I don't actually see a lot of mental processes being involved in her answers. She answers them so easily and confidently, as if she know them by heart.


That's experience talking, not theory.

quote:

And there is another thing. Many slaves mentioned that one aspect of internal enslavement is accepting commands without thinking. I really tend to think that suppression of thought is unhealthy, if for no other reason, then simply because the brain that is not active deteriorates.


But if we're all brainwashed it really is moot now isn't it? You'd figure we'd do as he says without complaint.

quote:

Also, I find it extremely scary to influence someone's religious beliefs. Porcelaine stated that any religious beliefs that are non compatible with Master, will be removed or put aside. For many people religion is extremely important part of who they are. Even touching this sensitive area is extremely risky and disrespectful to them. Just my opinion.


As I previously mentioned I'm not religious. I don't practice anything. Nor are my partners for that matter. Most are either Atheist or Agnostic. So it is of no consequence in my relationships. However, religion is a factor for others. If the girl holds it in high esteem it would sensible for her to find a partner that shared a similar opinion. Some dominants have zero desire to exert control in this area. Others will and have no problem influencing religious or political beliefs. Each dynamic is different.

~porcelaine




BitaTruble -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/26/2010 11:33:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SocratesNot

I don't think this is the case. Jeff said how by owning whole slave, he actually wanted all of the aspects of her to be under his control. So he dictates her hair color, what will she it, what will she drink, who will she be friend with, even what will she think. I can't grasp how anything of her is actually left to herself. He can change her completely, make a new person, a new personality, with new value system. For me it seems that not much of her old self remained intact, if anything.


This would probably be better answered by actually asking Jeff what parts of Carol were stripped away and which parts, if any, remained in tact .. keeping in mind that Jeff and Carol are a single example. Michael and I are another single example, Merc/beth yet another and there are many more examples to be found and each of us represent only that we *know* our own relationships like no one else can possibly know them but don't expect to have any sort of magical or additional insight when it comes to the relationships of other couples/triads etc.

I am someone who does live a TPE relationship, identifies with IE and uses the words slave and property to describe the dynamic I share with Himself. Hair color, eating, drinking, friends.. pretty much that's all superficial with very little personal meaning to me and many dominants enjoy micromangement as their style. Himself exerts where he wishes to and does not when he does not wish to do so. The mundane day to day doesn't interest him much and as long as there is money in the bank and a good credit rating so that he can buy what he wants when he wants he doesn't care if I order checks with ducks or dogs on them. IF he wanted dogs, dogs it would be.

TPE, in our view, means that Himself has the right to exercise his power in the areas he chooses (which may be all, or none at any given moment but is usually some), when he chooses, as often, where, under what circumstances etc. etc.

As for blind obedience, I think it's given short shift as a way to live because it rarely starts out that way. For us, it was a process taken with baby steps, sometimes painful, almost always educational until we got to a point where obedience was done without thought because all the thinking came before that point. It's blind, not stupid and certainly not thoughtless but rather with forethought and, for us, it's based on my absolute loyalty to him and trust in him. Long term thoughtful consideration went into almost every aspect of our relationship. I wrote these words many years ago in regard to our relationship ... they still hold true today - He is not the Earth and air but he makes the air sweeter and the Earth more tolerable a place to be. In other words, he's an imperfect human, just like me, but we fit, yanno?

You want to know why some of us can't leave? It has nothing to do with the ability to walk out the front door and hail a cab. My legs work perfectly fine but the body, that shell, walking out isn't *me* because as soon as I even attempt to do so I have to put the masks back on. Me, Celeste, the core and everything I am when I am with him is left behind. There's a whole different person who would be walking away and at this time, just in this moment, that's not even something I can comprehend. I await the next moment and the one after that with anticipation and excitement to see what they will bring. Just because in this moment I am prevented from leaving doesn't mean in the next something won't have changed to make it entirely possible and I can walk out intact and whole without wearing a mask at all but crystal balls and fortune telling are not my thing. The future remains forever mutable.




SocratesNot -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/26/2010 11:52:35 PM)

quote:

The future remains forever mutable.


That gave me some relief.

I actually think that I am beginning to understand your relationship. I am too tired to explain it now, I will tell you tomorow, but I think it started to make sense to me.




reynardfox -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/27/2010 12:18:57 AM)

Are you writing this in prison? You seem to have an awful lot of time on your hands.




LadyNTrainer -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/27/2010 12:26:05 AM)

 in t
quote:

ORIGINAL: SocratesNot
I am mainly talking about maledom relationships now, but some things can apply to femdom relationships as well.
That being said LNT said, that she is SURE that her primary submissive partner would kill himself if she wanted this.
Can it be in any way healthy? She said that being loyal to her is more important to her partner than being alive.
Really, can this be healthy?


Yes, it can.  My partners and I are very happy and very healthy.  I might ask how you were doing in your personal and social life in comparison, but we already know the answer to that.

I'd detail the psychology of the thing, but it's been an utter waste of my time attempting to explain anything you thus far.  I am not interested in continuing.  Please leave me and my personal life out of your posts in the future.  I prefer not to further encourage pointless and pompous pontifications, and I do not wish to engage with you at all.

I have no idea why I am even seeing this individual's posts any more.  I already clicked the "hide" box on his profile, but it doesn't seem to be working.  If a moderator or an experienced forum user can help me figure out why this didn't help, I'd appreciate it.  SN has earned the dubious distinction of being the first person I've chosen to use that function for.




SocratesNot -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/27/2010 12:32:05 AM)

quote:

SN has earned the dubious distinction of being the first person I've chosen to use that function for.


Congratulations for breaking the ice! I hope you'll soon hide posts of some other users too. Finally you'll reach perfect harmony of only seeing posts of users who usually agree with you.




laurell3 -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/27/2010 12:34:28 AM)

Agree with you? You used her personal life as your "theory" without consulting her and without making any real attempt to understand her and THIS is your response? Think again SN, you are really really out of order here.




LadyNTrainer -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/27/2010 12:38:31 AM)

Never mind the holler for assistance.  I did find the correct hide button, which was on the forum itself rather than on the CM profile.  I am now enjoying blessed relief from bad science, which is pretty much the only thing that will actually make me safeword out of having to look at it.  [:D]




SocratesNot -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/27/2010 12:39:03 AM)

Laurell, I just mentioned her relationship as an example of how far submissives are willing to go to please their dominant. I didn't insult her. I think of her relationship very positively, if there is such level of loyalty , but I still don't understand it for completely logical reasons.
I happened to admire her posts a lot, I don't see why is she pissed off. I never said she'll tell her partner to kill himself. I just said he would if she did.
I am not sure if that much of devotion is healthy, not just in her case, but having in mind other TPE relationships (BTW, her relationship maybe even isn't TPE)




SocratesNot -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/27/2010 12:42:38 AM)

LNT will not really use this option on me. You know why? Because, I will continue to stir some good discussion on this site, and people will respond to me.
She will be tempted to see what these people are responding to.
Just my little opinion [:D]




LittleBroken -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/27/2010 1:50:17 AM)

Has anyone got any nice recipes for coleslaw?

I don't like one that's not too weighed down with dressing.

Here is a lovely Peanut Butter Cookie recipe.

1 cup of Crunchy Peanut Butter.
1 cup of Self Raising Flour.
1/2 a cup of Sugar.

Mix together until it forms a stiff dough.
Roll into balls and place onto a oiled cookie sheet and bake in a moderate oven until crisp and golden.




Aileen1968 -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/27/2010 3:56:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SocratesNot


I also have a visceral reaction about words "slave" and "property".
D/s is OK, being someone submissive is OK, kinky scenes are OK, hard beatings are OK as long as there is no permanent harm.

But, can someone honestly tell me, can being a literal "slave" and "property" without personal identity actually be healthy for anyone?
I am not concerned about physical aspects of this, because in many TPE relationships there isn't very much sadomasochistic elements at all.
What worries me are psychological risks of that.
What makes you think that personal identity is lost? One of the big things that attracted him to me was my personality. Why would he want to erase that? There is a lot of sadomasochistic elements in our TPE relationship. Your generalizations are inaccurate.

quote:

The word "slave", no matter how erotic it can be, is an ugly word for me. It has so many negative connotations, that I can not like it.
The same thing I feel about the word "property".
When something is your property you have all the rights to use it and abuse it in any ways, and also to destroy it.
Using the word "property" to describe a human being does not feel good for me.
The people in my world, family and friends that I know, don't destroy their personal property. They take good care of it. The same for him. He takes good care of me. Why do you assume destruction? I am his. I am valuable to him. It's bad decision making to destroy valuable things in someone's life.


quote:

But still, if someone is really a slave, internally enslaved, owned and deprived of personal identity, how dependent she becomes on her Master?
What happens if Master dies? This is very likely to happen for two reasons:
first, women live longer
second, Master is usually quite older than slave.
No loss of personal identity so this becomes mute. People are dependent on others all throughout their lives. A TPE is no different.

quote:

So if Master owns WHOLE slave (which Jeff said that this is his goal) how much of her being is left to her?
Would her life have any sense at all if the Master died or left her?

I tend to believe that in order to be healthy every person must have some personal strength within.
That's why I am extremely afraid of relationships such as TPE or internal enslavement, despite all of its positive sides.
Could someone enlighten me about this very hard topic?
His first rule for me is to be the best person I can be...the best mother, sister, friend, photographer, etc. etc. etc. He doesn't want a mindless, unthinking robot. He wants a vibrant, confident woman on his arm...that does what he says.






Jeffff -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/27/2010 4:47:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SocratesNot

LNT will not really use this option on me. You know why? Because, I will continue to stir some good discussion on this site, and people will respond to me.
She will be tempted to see what these people are responding to.
Just my little opinion [:D]




No you don't.

No she won't




xxblushesxx -> RE: Risks of internal enslavement aka TPE (5/27/2010 5:12:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LittleBroken

Has anyone got any nice recipes for coleslaw?

I don't like one that's not too weighed down with dressing.

Here is a lovely Peanut Butter Cookie recipe.

1 cup of Crunchy Peanut Butter.
1 cup of Self Raising Flour.
1/2 a cup of Sugar.

Mix together until it forms a stiff dough.
Roll into balls and place onto a oiled cookie sheet and bake in a moderate oven until crisp and golden.


That'll get ya mod-spanked broken...(I know you love a good spanking but...)




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875