Andalusite
Posts: 2492
Joined: 1/25/2009 Status: offline
|
Generally speaking, I respect the labels people choose for themselves. I've seen "vanilla" used as a derogatory term, but mostly toward people who are into S/M and/or bondage, by the D/s and M/s folks, rather than toward people who actually aren't kinky. I've been in egalitarian kinky relationships, but I don't feel the term "vanilla" fit me at all when I was in them. IMHO, they don't have the right to unconsensually call me vanilla, or a doormat, or a slut, or a bitch, or a goddess, or any other BDSM-oriented relationship label or verbal humiliation endearment. I'm a switch, and at the moment, I'm a somewhat dominant Top. My femsub playpartner calls me "Milady," but I don't encourage that from other submissives who I'm not involved with. When I was in my previous relationship, I was a slave as well. Calling me by a relationship designation that is currently accurate, or using "switch," is fine. LA, if you consider yourself to be vanilla, and want to use that term, I have no problem with that. Same goes for Jeff (leadership) and a few others around here. It doesn't accurately describe me, though, regardless of any dynamic or relationship I've been in, or even if I'm single and not playing with anyone. "Kinky" and "switch" are part of my identity, just like "heteroflexible" and "woman" are. Laurell, I don't know of anyone who has no interest in kink who uses the term vanilla. Your friends might object to being called kinky, but I'd be pretty surprised if they insisted that they were vanilla, and would be curious how they had encountered the term.
< Message edited by Andalusite -- 6/3/2010 5:10:58 PM >
|