RE: Would this be annoying to you? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


lurch999 -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/6/2010 6:51:59 PM)

Ma'am is for real and so am i. She did let me go for an incident that followed xboxgate.




ElanSubdued -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/6/2010 6:58:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lurch999

Ma'am is for real and so am i. She did let me go for an incident that followed xboxgate.


I can't even read this and not laugh!  If my dominant had let me go over a significant issue in our relationship, the last thing I'd be doing is casually describing it as "xboxgate" and publishing it on the Internet.  Call me just a tad suspicious, but...

*still laughing*

*and still...*
*and still...*
*and still...*

Oh my God... my belly hurts! :-)

If this is for real, you have my sincerest apology, but the more I think about it, the more the exploits you've described seem highly unlikely.

E.




LanceHughes -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/6/2010 7:07:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ElanSubdued

quote:

ORIGINAL: lurch999

Ma'am is for real and so am i. She did let me go for an incident that followed xboxgate.


I can't even read this and not laugh!  If my dominant had let me go over a significant issue in our relationship, the last thing I'd be doing is casually describing it as "xboxgate" and publishing it on the Internet.  Call me just a tad suspicious, but...

*still laughing*

*and still...*
*and still...*
*and still...*

Oh my God... my belly hurts! :-)

If this is for real, you have my sincerest apology, but the more I think about it, the more the exploits you've described seem highly unlikely.

E.


And the very worst part of it all is that it has been non-consensual.

MODS!  Your attention, please! Are there one or two posters / posers?  You helped with the question about "Is TheRaptorJesus really DomiGuy in disguise?"




LadyNTrainer -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/6/2010 7:23:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
LadyN, I seriously think you should get that seen to.  I know you're a keen fitness fan, but I feel that you've overdone it a bit on the sit-ups, there.

[mod edit: image removed from quote]


Ahh, fudgemuffins.  Your nice little present to me got modspanked before I got to see it.  Send it over on the otherside, please?




LadyNTrainer -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/6/2010 7:25:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LanceHughes
MODS!  Your attention, please! Are there one or two posters / posers?  You helped with the question about "Is TheRaptorJesus really DomiGuy in disguise?"


Good gods, like that wasn't obvious from the get-go.  I haven't seen any threads in which the mods comment on that, though.




PeonForHer -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/6/2010 7:31:34 PM)

It was only your own pic of the mutilated arse, reproduced, LadyN [;)]




LadyNTrainer -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/6/2010 7:36:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

It was only your own pic of the mutilated arse, reproduced, LadyN [;)]


*snicker*  Except that I don't have BALLS.  Metaphorically I'm told that I do, but not the literal ones in the picture, I'm afraid.  [:D]




PeonForHer -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/6/2010 8:11:23 PM)

Pfft.  After seeing the pic of that lad's testicle falling out of his scrotum, who the hell would want balls?  Nah, you're better off without them.





CynthiaWVirginia -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/6/2010 9:51:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ElanSubdued

Cynthia,

I just posted this in another "Lurch" thread, but it fits perfectly here too.  I'm starting to wonder whether Lurch999, MistressXbox, and everything posted under these two accounts isn't a huge hoax perpetrated for someone's amusement.  Lurch himself is the kind of submissive experienced dommes spot very quickly and avoid.  And MistressXbox, if she is as experienced as she claims to be, why is she putting up with the antics of this boy in private and, in public, his seemingly insatiable need to second-guess his dominant's commands and spoodge private aspects of their relationship all over this forum?  The Tolkien-esque-come-perverse-baby-talk, foot fetish stuff is just more support for the argument.  I know of no dominant who would allow a boy to continue this way had the dominant voiced their displeasure at this activity.  My vote is neither of these two exist and someone's having a great laugh at our expense.

Side note:  this post isn't a jab at baby talk.  Rather, I'm just noting what we've been led to believe are the dominant's feelings on the matter.  So, adding everything up, Lurch previously bought a video game he was told not to, refused to accept confiscation of his Xbox for a week, and now ignores his dominant's wishes again, both in private and in public.  Even Lurch's new avatar photo, which we're supposed to believe is punishment, penance, and atonement, feels odd.  This doesn't seem how a dominant, after releasing a boy, would agree to take him back.  Let's get real here.  There is no dominant in this equation.  What we have is a troll who is having a wonderful time posting fiction.

Elan.

ElanSubdued, I am aware of this possibility but since I don't know this as a fact, I'm choosing to be nice and answer as if this is all real. 
 
It may be, because I have met a few just like him...I lost interest quickly. 
 
Does it really matter?  If we respond in here, it's because we choose to respond.  Nobody is forcing us...not even lurch.  (I know where my block button is too, but have chosen not to use it.)
 
I've read a lot of lurch's threads, and yes, he does seem to enjoy his own wit  [:D]  and provocative behavior.  There are men from CM local to me who want just the kink, think any owner/property dynamic is a crock, and ignore what a woman says she needs because their own kink lust is reigns supreme.  I haven't chosen one of these for a sub, as they can't possibly meet my needs.  Might be fun to top sometimes, but too much hassle to own, yanno?
 
As for MistressXbox, if she ever shows up at a munch I won't have a discussion with her over lurch or presume to tell her how she should handle him.  For all we know, she may indeed be real, and lurch might have some amazing qualities we are completely unaware of.   
 
The message boards are different for me than chatrooms...I save my troll hunts/bashing for there, when the game's afoot and everybody's having fun, even the troll.  Breaks up the boredom. [;)]
 
Sorry to hear you find this offensive.  I've been, until this moment when I'm admitting to it, secretly amused by his behavior.  I've also been enjoying that JesustheRaptorWhatever's posts.  They're not domiguy, because one of the Mods checked it out and said so.
 
So I've been looking you all over very carefully trying to guess who it is.  Nonononono...don't tell me.  LOL. I'm having fun with this whodunnit.
 
Someone reminded me that many males start off as horney net geeks but then...grow if given a chance.  Regardless, it's good to see opinions and advice, because others might do a search on the subjects discussed in this thread someday and they won't care who lurch is or if he was a troll.




gedienstig -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/7/2010 3:24:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
Pfft.  After seeing the pic of that lad's testicle falling out of his scrotum, who the hell would want balls?  Nah, you're better off without them.

[sm=wtf.gif] are you people watching online? And no, I don't need them pictures in private messages, since I will check them out probably, and lose my lunch...




PeonForHer -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/7/2010 4:54:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: gedienstig

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
Pfft.  After seeing the pic of that lad's testicle falling out of his scrotum, who the hell would want balls?  Nah, you're better off without them.

[sm=wtf.gif] are you people watching online? And no, I don't need them pictures in private messages, since I will check them out probably, and lose my lunch...


They were online, gedienstig, but the mods removed them.  They were set within posts that Elan and LNT had done.  The truly hideous one of the scrotum was done originally as a link, though, in a post by ReginaMirus. Here's a link to that post:  http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3243380





cloudboy -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/7/2010 6:00:42 AM)

quote:

feet


You aren't following the the lead of the OP here, its "feets," not feet.




gedienstig -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/7/2010 6:08:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

quote:

feet


You aren't following the the lead of the OP here, its "feets," not feet.

Said the kettle to the pot...
It's Ma'am's "feeties" not "feets" 




VaguelyCurious -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/7/2010 6:14:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: gedienstig

Said the kettle to the pot...
It's Ma'am's "feeties" not "feets" 


Said the...[some other black kitchen implement] to the kettle...

Both nonsense words are used in the original post.

By a man who refuses to acknowledge typos such as evolve and narcisistic as being the *real* words they clearly represent...




divi -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/7/2010 6:34:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lurch999

Ma'am is for real and so am i. She did let me go for an incident that followed xboxgate.


You and your Maam are both annoying.  Can only imagine how much more so with you speaking baby talk ..




Bella1965 -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/7/2010 8:56:14 AM)

G'morning all:



quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly
A narcissist is excessively preoccupied with thoughts of power, prestige, personal adequacy, denial of personal faults. The narcissistic personality disorder is associated with gross self-centeredness.
*sighs* Not according to Webster's.

Narcissism - love of or sexual desire for one's own body. Also see; egoism.

Egoism - a doctrine that individual self-interest is the actual motive of all conscious action OR a doctrine that individual self-interest is the valid end of all actions.
Excessive concern for oneself with or without exaggerated feelings of self-importance.

This aspect can be ascribed to anyone, regardless of orientation, gender, age, or preference.


Stay safe, play nice & share your toys w/ others...


[:D]


Bella




sirsholly -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/7/2010 10:48:32 AM)

quote:

*sighs* Not according to Webster's.
Well dayyyy-um...if anyone wants a medical definition from here on in, check Websters dictionary!

<<<<y'all will excuse me while i lug this Physicians Desk Reference right on out to the trash, wontyahuh?? [8|]




VaguelyCurious -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/7/2010 10:58:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly

quote:

*sighs* Not according to Webster's.
Well dayyyy-um...if anyone wants a medical definition from here on in, check Websters dictionary!

<<<<y'all will excuse me while i lug this Physicians Desk Reference right on out to the trash, wontyahuh?? [8|]



Just try not to trip over it on the way out. [:D][:D][:D]

I was thinking the same thing, btw.




divi -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/7/2010 11:01:17 AM)

Holly dont throw it out I know someone who can sit on so they can reach the keyboard




sirsholly -> RE: Would this be annoying to you? (6/7/2010 11:01:47 AM)

quote:

Just try not to trip over it on the way out.
:::::SPLAT:::::ow




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875