MarcEsadrian
Posts: 852
Joined: 8/24/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: submale4u2spank From what I've seen, women that work as professional dominatrices often aren't dominant in their personal relationship. Is this accurate and if so why? If it is accurate for those you've met, it could be any number of reasons. Topping for money can be simply for that; there is no promise beyond the ephemeral acts. There are many ex pros who will tell you the service orientation of the arrangement didn't sit well with them over time. Melissa Febos articulates that fairly well in her book Whipsmart. She came to see much of the clientele as enacting a form of inverted misogyny, where she felt more humiliated than her clients in the end. A part of the "pro" gamut does fit that mold, and so it's not so surprising that some females who persist in being "pro" really aren't fulfilling the spirit of dominance much at all past the paycheck—and they couldn't care less. On the other hand, those who think all pros are equal in caliber, motive or method are pretty naive. There are certainly Pro Dominas who are lifestyle as well, and have found the key to employment zen (doing what you love). It's a mistake to assume all professional domination is simply an indiscriminant "service", too. Some professionals are very choosy about who pays to be in their presence, and would find the idea that they really aren't dominant rather amusing. In short, the world is vast, as are the number of people in it. You'll be hard pressed to find any absolutes about personality types across the board in a profession like domination.
_____________________________
Omnes una manet nox Founder, Humbled Females
|