LadyPact
Posts: 32566
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Andalusite I think most of the anger isn't actually toward pro-Dommes, but rather for "false advertising" and "bait and switch. Bondage.com insists that pros use a symbol to mark them, and I've never seen any negative posts about pros in the forums there (and there are several who participate, or at least used to). I have to agree with cloudboy that coming on here to advertise professional services would be very similar to an escort advertising on Match or E-Harmony. If a high percentage of the ads were actually for pros there, a lot of men would probably get angry, especially if they were not up-front about it, and only brought it up after a few weeks and several e-mails had gone by. I'm somewhat on the fence about this. I've never been a member of Match or E, so I don't really know. Do either of those sites have a specific category for professional services such as we have here on the boards? I would have to think that does make a difference in how people make their observations. I'm not a member of Bondage.com, so I'm not at all aware of their situation. quote:
I don't have any interest in slamming men who patronise pro-Dommes, but I have mentioned before that it is a warning sign when I consider one to be personally involved with. If he is currently seeing a pro-Domme, I'll assume he isn't actually interested in a relationship. If he saw one a couple of times years ago, no big deal. If all of his experience is with pro-Dommes, I'll be suspicious that he has no relationship skills or social skills, and is basically undateable. If he has had LTRs with vanilla women, I would ask questions about whether or not he asked her to participate with him, if he went to a pro while they were dating without her knowledge, and what his expectations are. I think that it is easy for someone who only sees Pros to get a very unrealistic, fantasy view of Dommes, expect them to be glamorous 24/7, not be interested in submission unless she's dressed up, and very likely bottom (sometimes in a very dominant masochistic way) rather than submit. The last one isn't automatically a dealbreaker, but I won't consider someone to be my submissive unless they are actually ceding authority. I'm not here to slam anyone either on the subject. We're close in our approaches to the rest, though I may be a bit tougher on the subject. If someone has been a client and never been in a dynamic with a lifestyle Domme, they aren't compatible with Me. That person and I have completely opposing views on the pay for play subject. I see it very much the same way as those who decide they are interested in BDSM because they have based all of their information on porn, rather than educating themselves on what D/s entails. quote:
I generally don't say negative things about pro-Dommes, and have a good friend who was a pro-switch for a while. If a pro is lying or just not forthright in her profile or initial e-mail, I don't think well of her, and I think men have a right to be angry. When a man offered me money, I was very offended by his attempt to turn me into a pro, when I had made it clear in my profile that I was looking for a relationship (which he was disqualified for due to distance).  I do happen to think that part is rather ironic. I did have to add to My profile that I am strictly a lifestyle Domme to curtail those types of emails. I still get them, of course. I think many females on the site do. So we've got one group of guys unhappy (which I find a completely legitimate issue) due to the bait and switch issue of supposed lifestyle females asking for money. Then we have a completely different group of guys who offer to pay for sessions from those of us not willing to do that. Sorry guys, but on that one, you're really working against each other. Maybe something that folks should think about. quote:
A while back, a man stalked a pro-Domme he had been a client of, and verbally attacked her submissive who was screening her mail (on orders). I thought very poorly of him, and I agree that it is important for pros and clients to maintain boundaries. When I worked in customer service, I genuinely wanted to be helpful. I had some repeat clients who I got to know, and we had interesting conversations, rather than just discussing the merchandise for a few minutes. I did actually care about them, and I think it helped me get repeat business. However, I didn't feel nearly as strongly toward them as I did toward my friends or the guys I dated. They were more on the "friendly acquaintances" level. Many times, clients do not see themselves as "clients". There was a very good piece written on this some time back. I'm not sure if you remember it. The person is not on this thread, so I don't want to use his name, but it was extremely good. It was a great reflection of what I had heard for years regarding how some male clients twist in their head that the pro they were seeing thought of them in a very unrealistic way. It was a completely awesome post.
_____________________________
The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie. Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread
|