barelynangel -> RE: Inaccurate Info (6/20/2010 8:44:48 AM)
|
Holly, I asked what you were not to irritate you or make you hostile -- i don't keep track of what everyone's license is which is why i asked sunshine initially (i.e., she has said a couple times she is a mental health professional and says stuff on here due to being same so i didn't know if i missed whether she was licensed or her education in same) - its interesting to see where everyone is coming from in in their POV. It does to me help to know when reading something they are determining is wrong. All this time i thought you were a nurse -- like a LPN, i didn't know the rest and its good to know because it puts a different perspective on things when you speak of such. THAT was why i asked. as far as who said its inaccurate -- the OP stated this: quote:
When there are threads with blatant inaccurate information being touted, I have often felt it was my duty as a mental health professional to clarify if no one else did. *************************************** To me, if someone is going to demand someone take THEIR information as accurate over another, it does help to know what that "mental health professional" concept is and their level of expertise -- licensed or unlicensed, college educated with additional education in the specific field or not. To me, offering contradictory information is good and well because it offers more information to everyone who can take or leave what they will and hopefully take what will benefit them -- i agree with this -- but to state you are qualified to discount someone elses statements beause its your duty is where i have a hard time with. Knowledge is one thing and offering it as a contradictory view point is good, but in a field such as mental health, is anything really accurate or inaccurate or is it simply case by case and the same concept of case law, you have case law that supports each argument. To me a license indicated a specific concept of education, as you said you have twelve years of education and you are required to have continuing education. That says a lot more and gives you more credibility because you have guidelines you work under and by doing so you know what YOUR line is -- i.e., diagnosing as well as dispensing advise randomly. Maybe i should clarify why i am very interested in this topic I have seen people indicate in discussions on this board that they have no problem diagnosing someone etc, even when they aren't licensed. So to me, it shows they don't appreciate the boundries of their profession. To me it goes towards credibility. From what you have stated Holly, i would find you credible because from what you have said you respect the boundries your profession has placed upon you even on someplace as anonymous as the internet. Off topic lol i don't know what is wrong with my puter, my mouse won't click on some links i.e., smileys, quotes and other font things :-( and i am too cheap to take it in lol. I am just discussing this Holly, because i am ignorant of the mental health profession and what each concept means in terms of licensed, unlicensed, no college, some college, advanced education such as Masters and PhDs. etc. So i am trying to explain it in terms i understand which may confuse others lol. angel
|
|
|
|