LanceHughes
Posts: 4737
Joined: 2/12/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: frazzle Lance, i do accept there are those who only think number 1. no consideration for the partner, but that isnt what i'm talking about. Sorry, but I think you missed my point. In your POST #1, you defined what YOU meant by a do-me bottom and the fact that the term as you define it is used derisively. I'm saying that YOUR definition is not my definition. My advice: when called someting, anything that you find offensive, simply assertively point out the poster's error. Note I said "assertively" and not "aggresively." How 'bout: "Sir, it disturbs me greatly that you feel I'm a 'do-me sub.' I have a definition of that term in my mind and it seems you have a different one. Would you please be so kind as to tell me what your definition of a 'do-me sub' is?" And then watch him sputter... LOL! Just 'cause it came from a Domly-type don't make it so. You have every right to ask about definitions no matter the length of the relationship. As a matter of fact, Lance's 2nd general order for s-types under my hand is one word: Transparency. By this I mean (and so explain) that whenever you are off-center, physically, mentally, emotionally, etc.... whenever things "just don't feel right," you are to explain. No if, ands, nor buts, about it. I'm not a frigging mind-reader. So, in this instance D-type is telling you what he thinks of you . . . That doesn't "feel right" (mainly 'cause you don't know what he means.) Transparency Law "kicks in" and you request a defintion as above.
< Message edited by LanceHughes -- 7/3/2010 5:34:19 PM >
_____________________________
"Train 'em the right way - my way." Lance Hughes "Advice is what we ask for when we already know the answer, but wish we didn't." Erica Jong 10 fluffy points 50 nz points Member: VAA's posse
|