Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntary manslaughter


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntary manslaughter Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 7:34:38 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Tell you what Elisabella....I need some help here,please show me where I argued that this shooting was intentional.Please find and clip the quote where I labeled this an intentional shooting.....While you perform that search what you will find is me calling hypocrisy on Sanity's silly "adrenalin factor" defence.....while holding a pro gun pov.
Trained professionals can either be trusted to use these "tools" correctly.....or no amount of training can prepare simple human beings for life and death situations.
Which is it?
Choose a stance,I know where I stand....but it would apppear some here switch theirpoint of view depending on the situation.....That offends me.
Do I doubt the "taser" story.....damm skippy I do.....but know I am not ready to assume this cop executed that young man as he laid on the floor.

< Message edited by slvemike4u -- 7/9/2010 7:35:13 PM >


_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Elisabella)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 7:42:17 PM   
FatherFigureOC


Posts: 7
Joined: 11/3/2007
Status: offline
Negligence is a civil tort, not a crime. Scholars of jurisprudence you're not.

This was a mistake, plain and simple. The cop said he was sorry. Get over it.

If the asshat was not being an asshat, he would not have been down on the ground in the first place and the whole incident would have never taken place.

And for all of you despots who want to take our guns away from us, take a look at mexico, which has some of the strictest gun laws in the world. How is that failed narco-terrorist state doing in protecting its citizens, by the way?

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 7:44:18 PM   
AsmodaisSin


Posts: 320
Joined: 7/28/2009
From: NOVA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy


quote:

ORIGINAL: AsmodaisSin

I'm not sure what to believe.  If I state that I feel that the verdict was fair, I'm labeled as a racist.  If I say that it had to be intentional because the guy was black, I'm a racist, because that assumes that the cop was racist for shooting the guy.  I feel like no matter what response anyone gives, they're going to get that label.  It just seems all so messed up to me. 

What's even worse is that these people feel it's necessary to destroy public property in order to protest.  What does that accomplish?



You don't have to worry about it......It's things like saying "these people" that kind of help people make up their mind.


Well, if I say, "them there black people", it's considered racist, and I don't know if every single person involved was black, so assuming they are is rude and disrespectful.  'These people' encompasses any and all people who chose to riot and destroy public property.


_____________________________

Something so symbolic seeps from silence.

(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 7:44:26 PM   
Elisabella


Posts: 3939
Status: offline
quote:

Trained professionals can either be trusted to use these "tools" correctly.....or no amount of training can prepare simple human beings for life and death situations.
Which is it?


Both. LEO's should be trained to be at the top of their game, but nothing is foolproof, and some people are more qualified than others.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 7:46:47 PM   
FatherFigureOC


Posts: 7
Joined: 11/3/2007
Status: offline
It doesn't matter if you think it was intentional or not. The cop was tried in front of a jury of his peers and they determined his crime. Just because you do not like the outcome does not change the verdict. Our system of justice is not perfect, but its the best in the world and we have to accept the verdict as it stands. Debating it is pointless.

There is plenty of black on white crime in the east bay that goes unpunished, every single day.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 7:50:13 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FatherFigureOC

Negligence is a civil tort, not a crime. Scholars of jurisprudence you're not.

This was a mistake, plain and simple. The cop said he was sorry. Get over it.

If the asshat was not being an asshat, he would not have been down on the ground in the first place and the whole incident would have never taken place.

And for all of you despots who want to take our guns away from us, take a look at mexico, which has some of the strictest gun laws in the world. How is that failed narco-terrorist state doing in protecting its citizens, by the way?

"The cop said he was sorry.Get over it"......
WOW,isthat how it works......one makes a mistake.....one apologises and we move on.
Is that the procedure when the dead person is white?
Or does that just work when we are talking about the.....darker races?
Before you respond allow me to say this.......Based solely on your posting I feel qualified to label you a complete and unmitigated asshole racist scumbag.
Now if I have made a mistake .......I apologise,Get Over It

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to FatherFigureOC)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 7:52:23 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FatherFigureOC

It doesn't matter if you think it was intentional or not. The cop was tried in front of a jury of his peers and they determined his crime. Just because you do not like the outcome does not change the verdict. Our system of justice is not perfect, but its the best in the world and we have to accept the verdict as it stands. Debating it is pointless.

There is plenty of black on white crime in the east bay that goes unpunished, every single day.

Oh shit,my mistake...I apologise....I completly forgot the ...."ye shall only debate issues that you can affect" rule.
What the fuck is wrong with me(and everyone else participating in this thread)

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to FatherFigureOC)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 7:57:48 PM   
FatherFigureOC


Posts: 7
Joined: 11/3/2007
Status: offline
If you're calling me a racist, that means I have won the argument. Resorting to ad hominem is a sign of intellectual bankruptcy. To wit:

Major Findings:
  • Police and the justice system are not biased against minorities.
Crime Rates
  • Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
  • When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.
  • Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white rate.
  • The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic.
Interracial Crime
  • Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.
  • Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.
  • Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.
  • Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa.
Gangs
  • Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white.
  • Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.
Incarceration
  • Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled, from 139 to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from 320,000 to 1.39 million.
  • Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than whites. Hispanics are three times more likely.
http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html

These are DOJ statistics, not my opinion. But you're entitled to be ignorant of certain irrefutable truths. Cops in Oakland do not have it easy, particularly on the west side of town. Your contempt for law enforcement is disgusting.


(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 8:06:28 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Not nearly as disgusting as your "get over it "racism.Claim your victory...hell get out your white sheet and throw a damm shindig.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to FatherFigureOC)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 8:23:47 PM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FatherFigureOC

Negligence is a civil tort, not a crime. Scholars of jurisprudence you're not.

This was a mistake, plain and simple. The cop said he was sorry. Get over it.

If the asshat was not being an asshat, he would not have been down on the ground in the first place and the whole incident would have never taken place.


If I ever see you crossing the street and decide to run you over for being an asshat, and then put a bullet in your back just to be sure,  I promise to apologize afterward. So we're good, right?



quote:

ORIGINAL: FatherFigureOC

And for all of you despots who want to take our guns away from us, take a look at mexico, which has some of the strictest gun laws in the world. How is that failed narco-terrorist state doing in protecting its citizens, by the way?



Considering that not one person in this thread has said a word about taking our guns away from us, just exactly what the fuck are you talking about? Do you even know?




_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to FatherFigureOC)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 8:28:02 PM   
FatherFigureOC


Posts: 7
Joined: 11/3/2007
Status: offline
That's your reply? You can't come up with something better? How do you even know what my skin color/ethnicity/race is? You do not. You suffer from some leftist pathology. I would look ridiculous in a white sheet (but not nearly as ridiculous as black latex). But more importantly, you cannot come up with a coherent response? Another sign of intellectual vacuousness between the ears and dishonesty. I will not engage with leftist dolts who are only here to engage in name-calling and personal attacks. Sorry.

I dont think the guy deserved to be shot in the back. No man does. But the verdict has been read, and the savages and taken to burn and loot the streets. Fuck them.

Here are the fallen officers of OPD:

http://www.odmp.org/agency/2872-oakland-police-department-california

How many do you want to bet were killed by black men?

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 8:30:44 PM   
FatherFigureOC


Posts: 7
Joined: 11/3/2007
Status: offline
"If I ever see you crossing the street and decide to run you over for being an asshat, and then put a bullet in your back just to be sure,  I promise to apologize afterward. So we're good, right?"

Is that a threat?


(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 8:32:43 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

quote:

Trained professionals can either be trusted to use these "tools" correctly.....or no amount of training can prepare simple human beings for life and death situations.
Which is it?


Both. LEO's should be trained to be at the top of their game, but nothing is foolproof, and some people are more qualified than others.
And when something goes wrong some amongst us would have the rest of us take into affect the (I love this term) "adrenalin factor"....fine I understand that....I come from New York....and I'm not all that impressed with the famous "41" shots poured into an unarmed man in New York....I fully understnd that once the first shot was fired.....those officers just emptied their weapons....The adrenalin factor at work...hell,one or two of those officers reloaded.
These were veteran NYC police officers....part of a somewhat elite team...not even just simple patrol officers.Yet they were subject to panic!
I accept that,and I understand that we ask our Police officers to do a difficult job.But if they are subject to these stresses and misjudgements...despite their professionalism and their training....why must I accept the contradictory claim that more guns in the hands of less well trained citizens will make me and mine safer?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Elisabella)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 8:38:26 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatherFigureOC

Is that a threat?





Better move to a community with a bigger gate, FF. Pandas are partly black, you know. He's eight times more likely to track you down.

Your statistics can just as easily be used to condemn the way we administer justice in this country, and the sort of dedication we demonstrate to insure all of our citizens equal protection under the law.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to FatherFigureOC)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 8:39:37 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FatherFigureOC

That's your reply? You can't come up with something better? How do you even know what my skin color/ethnicity/race is? You do not. You suffer from some leftist pathology. I would look ridiculous in a white sheet (but not nearly as ridiculous as black latex). But more importantly, you cannot come up with a coherent response? Another sign of intellectual vacuousness between the ears and dishonesty. I will not engage with leftist dolts who are only here to engage in name-calling and personal attacks. Sorry.

I dont think the guy deserved to be shot in the back. No man does. But the verdict has been read, and the savages and taken to burn and loot the streets. Fuck them.

Here are the fallen officers of OPD:

http://www.odmp.org/agency/2872-oakland-police-department-california

How many do you want to bet were killed by black men?

Kiss my ass...what makes you think I would extend any effort at all with the likes of you.....I will discuss and debatewith Elisabella,Heretic and dozens others.Hell I will slam,argue and tweak the likes of willbur and sanity.....you on the other hand do not in any way shape or form require,nor will you recieve,any effort at all from me......you're a fucking asshole....nothing more,nothing less.
"savages"?.....Do you even think about the rhetoric and the code words contained therein or you've been spouting it so long that you no longer care?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to FatherFigureOC)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 8:42:19 PM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FatherFigureOC

How many do you want to bet were killed by black men?



How many were killed by that black man?

And if you can't answer that question, then again - why do you keep bringing up shit that's completely irrelevant? Again, what the fuck are you even babbling about? Or do you even know?


_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to FatherFigureOC)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 8:44:45 PM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FatherFigureOC

"If I ever see you crossing the street and decide to run you over for being an asshat, and then put a bullet in your back just to be sure,  I promise to apologize afterward. So we're good, right?"

Is that a threat?




Say what? You really feel that easily threatened, do you?

Don't bother answering. That's one of them there "rhetorical questions".


_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to FatherFigureOC)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 8:54:55 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatherFigureOC
These are DOJ statistics, not my opinion. But you're entitled to be ignorant of certain irrefutable truths. Cops in Oakland do not have it easy, particularly on the west side of town. Your contempt for law enforcement is disgusting.

Actually these are statistics put together by a racist organization.

Jared Taylor, the author of the stuff you pasted, is an open racist who runs several notorious racist websites and organizations but I'm sure you knew that all ready.

(in reply to FatherFigureOC)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 9:03:49 PM   
FatherFigureOC


Posts: 7
Joined: 11/3/2007
Status: offline
That was a thinly veiled hypothetical expressing intent to run me over and shoot me? I asked a foundational question, which you cannot answer a simple "yes" or a "no." The ball is in your court, homie.

At this point Im guessing y'all are probably a full standard deviation lower in IQ than the general population. but thats just a guess. I dont like thinly veiled hypotheticals which involve harm to me. Your mind would be better of imagining other things and hurting and/or killing someone else.

"Rhetoric" involves making an argument, which you aren't. There is nothing rhetorical or persuasive about "what if" you ran me over and shot me in the back. If that happened, I would not have an opinion, now would I?

Public safety often includes accidents. No man deserves to be shot in the back while prone.

But the victim in this scenario would not have been in the position he was in if he were not a scofflaw and hooligan making trouble at the Fruitvale BART platform. This is a simple concept no one here seems to understand. Just a bunch of bloviating blowhards.

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntar... - 7/9/2010 9:05:56 PM   
FatherFigureOC


Posts: 7
Joined: 11/3/2007
Status: offline
where is your proof einstein? you scream racism but you dont have any facts.

please dont cite some $PLC report. those are not facts.

(in reply to FatherFigureOC)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Jury Verdict: Oakland BART shooting was involuntary manslaughter Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.110