RE: You're looking a boyfriend, not a Dom.

RE: You're looking a boyfriend, not a Dom. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

SassySarijane -> RE: You're looking a boyfriend, not a Dom. (7/12/2010 11:53:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LanceHughes quote: ORIGINAL: NorthernGent quote: ORIGINAL: sexyred1 I was traumatized as a young girl by math. I was brilliant at all subjects except math. It was those story problems..."a train is going 125 miles an hour. how long would it take to get to San Diego if the train veers off track and the passengers are picked up by a jet plane going 1000 miles?" How many passengers are there? Where did the train start it's journey? When the train veers of its track how many die? Is the jet plane British Airways or Air France? When you say 'get to San Diego'....do you mean the plane landing on the tarmac....or all the passengers through passport control and having a beer in the airport bar? Is anyone on the plane pregnant to the point of dropping?......need to know the chances of an unscheduled stop in Turkey....When the passengers are picked up by the jet plane...do they actually get into the aircraft or are they suspended on the wings by rope as this plane travels its 1000 miles. I think I can work this out for you given a chance. It should save a few tears so more than happy to help. As the plane crossed the California / Mexico border it crashed. In what country are the survivors buried? I just wanna know why any survivors would be buried no matter which country they landed in. [:D]

MistressRoux -> RE: You're looking a boyfriend, not a Dom. (7/13/2010 8:04:48 AM)
I don't see the problem of wanting kink in the context of a relationship. I'm told it's better, but I wouldn't know. I think this would be especially important for a sub as there is a great deal of trust required. If a person's truly open to kink with a boyfriend, what's the problem with them being on here? I don't see one. Let them do them. While a master or a do-me dom may find a problem with this, those who are into the lifestyle as a whole probably won't. If the munches I've been to are representative, it seems like a lot of people in the lifestyle are in relationships. Eventually, when I'm prepared for a relationship, this would probably be a better source of submissive boyfriends than the neighborhood bars. I've been involved with several vanilla men and I've found introducing most of them to BDSM a real pain in the ass (though I'm sure some enjoy it). I don't see the point of wasting energy on this part when there are men, who are more than willing, waiting and probably with women who are appalled by the idea of dominating.

sunshinemiss -> RE: You're looking a boyfriend, not a Dom. (7/13/2010 11:52:20 PM)
Hello Roux, I'm curious... why would it be expecially important for a submissive person? There is a great deal of trust required on the other side of things, too. I'm curious about your presupposition. best, sunshine

xxblushesxx -> RE: You're looking a boyfriend, not a Dom. (7/13/2010 11:58:42 PM)
Well, because it's hard to fight back when you're chained up, bent over, and have a ballgag in your mouth! (just guessing...)

sunshinemiss -> RE: You're looking a boyfriend, not a Dom. (7/14/2010 12:04:35 AM)
It's hard to have a relationship when the D-type is in jail for assault too! *Just guessing.

BentUnit -> RE: You're looking a boyfriend, not a Dom. (7/14/2010 2:05:48 AM)
With all due respect... I don't see why this thread still remains here in General Dis. and hasn't been moved to Polls and Random Stupidity. Was this thread ever anything more than a random drive by shitting and honestly has the OP ever came back to defend or expand on his original thoughts? Leaving the thread here gives it more weight than it ever deserved unless this some way of passive aggressively punishing the OP for being an Arse and holding his monumental stupidity up as an example for other lack-wits. If that's the case then by all means..long let the flaming continue.

crazyml -> RE: You're looking a boyfriend, not a Dom. (7/14/2010 4:24:31 AM)
I too am surprised that this wasn't booted to random stupidity at about page 3!

GotSteel -> RE: You're looking a boyfriend, not a Dom. (7/14/2010 4:16:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BentUnit Was this thread ever anything more than a random drive by shitting and honestly has the OP ever came back to defend or expand on his original thoughts? He did come back to try and explain himself better at one point and not only failed utterly but managed to contradict himself. I don't really blame him for not trying again, he doesn't seem able to express his issue terribly well and there's also how he's been heckled for the last 17 pages, how many people would walk back into that.

IronBear -> RE: You're looking a boyfriend, not a Dom. (7/14/2010 8:48:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: porcelaine [I'm willing to bet he bought into the notion that being dominant means he doesn't have to do nada. His aura would draw them in like flies and all that normal relationship stuff that he had to do to get a girl would go bye bye. Now while there are a few girls that seem to get off on that in theory (or so they say on the Internet), I don't encounter that outside of here. Most people want something out of a relationship aside from a guy that shows up making demands. ~porcelaine 'struth, fuck a duck. stone the bloody crows and root my boot, you mean that when I started out as a Dominant, it didn't automatically tick all the positive boxes on ever single female?? No wonder it's been a drought here. Y..y you mean to tell me that I actually have to get of my arse and do something? Would setting up a blow up slave doll work as a decoy just like duck hunters? I know if I use a blow up sheep I get Kiwis crawling all over the place.... Mayhap I should start using Eaude d'Bruin after shave or even run nakid about the streets? Sheesh why didn't they give me a copy of the "New Dom's hand Book"?

Page: << < prev 13 14 15 16 [17]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125