RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mikeyOfGeorgia -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 12:02:15 PM)

oh, well...life goes on.if wishes really could come true, huh?




BoiJen -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 12:06:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VirginPotty

BoiJen,
I'm not disagreeing with THAT at all. What I disagree with it being taught in the kindergarten classroom.  Parent's responsibility and all that sort of rubbish.


The edge of that sword is sharp and deadly.




BoiJen -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 12:08:20 PM)

Mikey,

Sometimes I believe your reading comprehension level decreases daily.

boi




mikeyOfGeorgia -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 12:09:30 PM)

must be from coming here and reading all these forums...LOL




LaTigresse -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 12:11:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikeyOfGeorgia

oh, well...life goes on.if wishes really could come true, huh?



Many of mine have...... and as I said, I really do not wish to be a Mod on here. Just the occasional fleeting 'what if' when I see nothing but consistent stupidity.




mikeyOfGeorgia -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 12:13:14 PM)

stupidity goes both ways...or so i hear




LaTigresse -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 12:14:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

Mikey,

Sometimes I believe your reading comprehension level decreases daily.

boi



Hearing apparently also.




BoiJen -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 12:14:06 PM)

Do you even realize what the fuck you just typed?




mikeyOfGeorgia -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 12:18:05 PM)

yes, i am fully aware of what i typed and was returning the sentiment i was given. but this is only detouring the topic at hand and i would rather not have a MOD come down on me for railroading another topic...so let's move on...SHALL WE? (AND NOW, BACK TO YOUR REGULARLY SCHEDULED FORUM)




tazzygirl -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 12:27:36 PM)

The comprehensive plan under consideration in Helena would:

Teach fifth graders that “sexual intercourse includes, but is not limited to vaginal, oral, or anal penetration;
Teach kindergarteners about “basic reproductive body parts (penis, vagina, breast, nipples, testicles, scrotum).”
Teach all grades that marriage is a “commitment by two people.”
Teach first graders that “human beings can love people of the same gender & people of another gender.”
Teach that sexual orientation refers to a “person’s physical and/or romantic attraction to an individual of the same and/or different gender.”
Teach sixth graders that sexual intercourse includes “using the penis, fingers, tongue or objects.”


Read more: http://radio.foxnews.com/2010/07/13/obama-supports-kindergarten-sex-ed/#ixzz0tgcmahKL

I have no issue with any of the above. Its intelligent, careful and age appropriate.




LaTigresse -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 12:31:40 PM)

Thank you Tazzy and I agree........totally appropriate.




cabernet -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 12:33:43 PM)

In the article it says:

"Teach kindergartners about “basic reproductive body parts (penis, vagina, breast, nipples, testicles, scrotum.)"

It doesn't say they are teaching 5 year-olds where to put their penis or that something will be going in to their vagina (or other orifices).  It's about teaching them names of body parts.  I don't see how it's much different from teaching them what their arms, legs and nose are called.

Remember the little boy in the movie Kindergarten Cop who announced, "Boys have a penis, girls have a vagina!"  Did anyone think that kid was warped for life because he knew that?




flcouple2009 -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 12:36:21 PM)

I have to agree with you and tazzy.

I don't see what all of the issues are over.

"edited to add"

Before anyone wonders we have 4 kids  under 9




LaTigresse -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 12:41:02 PM)

The funny thing is, I remember when I was in grade school, having a sex ed class in gym. I don't remember how old, 5th or 6th grade. They basically did the whole boring, identifying the bits and how those bits would be changing due to puberty. That was the extent of the education but still........if they were comfortable doing that wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy back then.....what is the big deal?

Oh yeahhhhhhhhhhhh, it's because our President thought it was a good idea!!!!! Bing bing bing!!!!! Lightbulb moment!!!!




flcouple2009 -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 1:01:36 PM)

I remember talking about sex and sex related things much younger than some of these people want to admit.  Much of it was trash picked up off the street.  




DomKen -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 1:02:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

The funny thing is, I remember when I was in grade school, having a sex ed class in gym. I don't remember how old, 5th or 6th grade.

I went to school outside Atlanta and for us it was 6th grade and I remember it because it was done in gender segregated classes and we only got stuff about our bodies and then a bunch of scare stuff about disease and pregnancy. It was pretty pathetic.




tazzygirl -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 1:05:35 PM)

Teaching facts is empowerment.

Teaching a 8 year old that someone putting their hand beneath their dress and fondling their breasts... is empowering.

teaching a 9 year old boy that the man down the street just dropped his pants and exposed his penis... is empowering.

using the correct terminology is empowering

Why should our children not be empowered?

Oh yeah, because it makes the parents uncomfortable.




mnottertail -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 1:06:59 PM)

same here and the one day it was on the howdie doodie stuff it was taught by catholic priests to the boys (it was a public gradeschool) they imported them from the local catholic school (but it turns out they were experts, hah?) and we wanted more to know what the girls class was doing......................I am sure they were having lesbian sex in there............ 




BoiJen -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 1:08:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
I went to school outside Atlanta and for us it was 6th grade and I remember it because it was done in gender segregated classes and we only got stuff about our bodies and then a bunch of scare stuff about disease and pregnancy. It was pretty pathetic.



Well, as of 12 years ago, the curriculum for sex ed outside of Atlanta hadn't changed much.

boi






DomKen -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 1:12:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
I went to school outside Atlanta and for us it was 6th grade and I remember it because it was done in gender segregated classes and we only got stuff about our bodies and then a bunch of scare stuff about disease and pregnancy. It was pretty pathetic.



Well, as of 12 years ago, the curriculum for sex ed outside of Atlanta hadn't changed much.

boi

Sadly its been more like 30 years ago for me. You'd think in almost 20 years things would have advanced far enough that girls could know that boys have penises and vice versa.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125