RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


DaddysInkedSlut -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 5:39:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddysInkedSlut


I will also say that when my daughters science class studied creationism I opted out of that for her as well.


Why would you opt her out of that? It would be far more instructive to let her hear it and then tear it apart.


Because I strongly believe in the seperation of church and state and do NOT believe a public school / classrooms are the place for religious descussions or "education".




tazzygirl -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 5:41:02 PM)

Having a history of being abused, its incredible what just a little bit of knowledge would have helped me back then. Education isnt dangerous, provided the education is appropriate. Since you both are saying you would educate your children yourself, and you would know before hand what the education system is providing, why would the thought of having someone else add to your own teaching be such a threat?

ETA

quote:

I also disagree that sex education is set up to prevent abuse or to stop abusers.


They arent, they are set up to educate. Through education, we are empowered. Through that empowerment, we can do many things, including stopping a cycle of abuse.




Arpig -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 5:43:27 PM)

~FR~
Why is this even an issue? We expect the schools to teach our kids about the digestive system, the respiratory system, the circulatory system...so why the fuck not the reproductive system? Its what the schools are there for...to teach the kids about the world, and their bodies are part of that world. Personally I don't give a fuck why a given parent doesn't want their kid to learn the facts, screw that parent is my view of it. If you teach your kid about sex...good for you, however that doesn't change anything. Sex education should be taught in schools and the parents should NOT have the right to opt their kids out...what's next opting your kids out of the classes that cover evolution, astrophysics, or any of the other aspects of reality that fundies choose to disbelieve?

Sex is a natural part of life, many seem to forget that for most of humanity's time on this planet people were mating in their early teens...that's why kids need to learn about it before then...that's the natural time, biologically speaking, for people to begin experimenting with sex. And it is the school systems' function to teach kids what they need to know about the world when they need to know it.




slvemike4u -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 5:44:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AsmodaisSin

I've got to agree with Rulemylife.  Y'all keep jumping to molestation and sexual abuse.  I'm confused.  Educate your children about these kinds of horrible things, but give the parents the chance to educate their children if they have the inclination to do so.  
The other,unstated portion, of that comment is "to give the parents who would prefer to keep their children ignorant every opportunity to do so".




Arpig -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 5:45:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddysInkedSlut


I will also say that when my daughters science class studied creationism I opted out of that for her as well.


Why would you opt her out of that? It would be far more instructive to let her hear it and then tear it apart.
Holy Shit!!!! Willbeur and I agree 100%...thread is now over

Edited to fix a fucked up quote




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 5:46:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddysInkedSlut


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddysInkedSlut


I will also say that when my daughters science class studied creationism I opted out of that for her as well.


Why would you opt her out of that? It would be far more instructive to let her hear it and then tear it apart.


Because I strongly believe in the seperation of church and state and do NOT believe a public school / classrooms are the place for religious descussions or "education".


In no way does teaching creationism violate the establishment clause, any more than a course in comparative religions.
If anything it supports it as long as its taugh honestly.




DaddysInkedSlut -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 5:48:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Having a history of being abused, its incredible what just a little bit of knowledge would have helped me back then. Education isnt dangerous, provided the education is appropriate. Since you both are saying you would educate your children yourself, and you would know before hand what the education system is providing, why would the thought of having someone else add to your own teaching be such a threat?


I dont see it as a threat, I NEVER once use that term or word. I do think that as a parent it is MY personal choice on how I educate my children regarding certain things, it is also my responsibility to do so.

And if you think you are the only parent to ever survive sexual abuse you are wrong.




tazzygirl -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 5:52:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddysInkedSlut


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Having a history of being abused, its incredible what just a little bit of knowledge would have helped me back then. Education isnt dangerous, provided the education is appropriate. Since you both are saying you would educate your children yourself, and you would know before hand what the education system is providing, why would the thought of having someone else add to your own teaching be such a threat?


I dont see it as a threat, I NEVER once use that term or word. I do think that as a parent it is MY personal choice on how I educate my children regarding certain things, it is also my responsibility to do so.

And if you think you are the only parent to ever survive sexual abuse you are wrong.



Never said i was the only one. I did say education was a powerful tool to break the cycle.

The bolded part of your post...

I will once again point out that society is already dictating what we do with our children on many levels. This is just another level. Too many parents decide they want to "teach" themselves, then later its found they were woefully lacking in their own ability to teach.

The school systems have stepped in. The courts have stepped in. You may feel entitled to decide what you do or do not teach your child. The courts have decided against you.




DaddysInkedSlut -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 5:55:24 PM)

This is the point were I agree to disagree on the fact that a parent does not and should not have the right to opt out of what is taught to their children in a public school setting. Specifically regarding sex education and religious topics.

ETA: Since I was able to OPT out of her taking part of the sex eduation class I dont see the courts decided against me or any parent in this matter.




CynthiaWVirginia -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 5:57:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Everyone who thinks it's wise for kindergarteners to take responsibility for preventing pedophile attacks can bite me.


No one said they were to take responsibility, i said they were to be empowered.  A 5 year old, or even older children, cannot ever be empowered enough to stand up to anyone other than a very incompetent pedophile.  Pedophiles in jail were even interviewed and studied...and they said they looked for quiet, submissive children, not ones like my baby sister who was a hellion from the start.  Learning words like penis and vagina will not turn a submissive child into an alpha one.  I dislike how a lot of posts have degenerated into practically accusing parents of being an accomplice to pedophilia if they don't "empower" their kids with a lot of words at a very young age.  Kids feel shame and blame already...I knew it was wrong when it was done to me and I didn't need to know the words penis and vagina and all that to tell my mother...yes, I did at first...she understood when I cried and stuttered out what happened and pointed to hurt places and told her about guys' whistles.  The doctors understood, and the police understood.  This is also why my aunt, who was a doll maker in Ohio, used to make anatomically correct dolls so kids in courtrooms could show without having to spell it out in words what had happened to them.

Being "empowered" means to be given power...and semantics aside, very young children will never have real power against an adult.  A girlfriend of mine freaked out when her molestor had moved back into town after all those years and she had to drop out of high school.  He had been a teenager then, and had promised to kill her family if she ever told and she BELIEVED him.  Now...everyone spell this out clearly to me how knowing the name for penis, vagina, how babies are made, and inappropriate touching would have made even a TINY difference in the reality of what happened? 
 
She was scared, hadn't been protected from him by adults, and had lost her faith in any adult being able to protect her from him.
No one said a child would win against a pedophile. An honest, open relationship between an adult and child gives the child a sense of self-worth, and its to that adult the child will turn too when the abuse begins.  I had that kind of relationship with my mother; I loved her dearly and was a mamma's girl.  My self-worth was stripped away and I changed...and seeing how the real world reacted (instead of the fantasy land most people imagine when they think justice will be done) I decided to never anyone again, but to try not to let it happen again.  I followed all the rules...but believe me, by the time the touching starts, it's way too late and after it's over you don't want to think about it, talk about it, or go to any more doctors.  We told my paternal grandmother, and she said what a nasty little girl I was and I became the filth in the family tree after that.  Grandma treasured my nice "clean" sister, and showed favoritism from that point on.

I'm sorry to disagree, and we can agree to disagree on this, but simple words do not give a child a sense of self-worth, but...how they are treated does.

Its about teaching the appropriate terms for organs so that if/when abuse begins, the child can speak of such terms and not feel the embarrassment you speak of.  Whether it's called a whistle or a penis, we know what it is and will always be embarrassed and ashamed.  "A rose by any other name..." and all that.  Pedophiles who are smart don't choose defiant, loudmouthed children to victimize.  Heck, a friend of mine was flashed by a man on her playground, in front of all her friends (elementary school) and she looked him up and down carefully and said, "Mister, if I had one that teensy I'd keep it covered up."  (The guy ran off and that's the last that I heard of him being on that elementary school playground.  This was over 35 years ago.)
 
It's easy to deflect blame onto where it doesn't belong and feel justified and safe...after all, you "empowered" your kids with all these words...so it will NEVER HAPPEN TO YOUR KIDS, right?  What if you do everything right and it still happens anyway?  To YOUR kid. 
 
Now where does the blame really go?  A young vulnerable child was ALONE with a pedophile...hello, right there is one red flag, the word alone.  Two, if the pedophile is good at what he/she does, then they are very likely a repeat offender...this also speaks volumes to me.  Children speak out all the time, but often nothing can be done but the parents and kid trying to be more careful next time.  If a child is or feels threatened, or that a parent will somehow see them as damaged goods an love them less..."empowering" will not motivate them to talk. 
 
Child protective services do the best they can to investigate reportings.  This is hard, very difficult, and doesn't have some easy school chat solutions.  I'm okay with offering this education in schools, but that parents should have a right to opt out without being called names like accomplices to pedophilia, nor should they have to face legal problems solely because their kid, like many others, got molested and they had been one of the opt out parents.  That's shiite.  I don't know who brought that up in this thread but whoever did lost some of my respect.  Not that it matters, as I don't care if people respect me less as a person for sounding off about all of this.

Predators bank on the taboo subject of sex... take the taboo out and they have less to rely upon.  This empowerment training, it would be interesting to know how well it actually works...using Germany.  So...I wonder if all pedophilia has ceased to exist in that country cuz the kiddies are so "empowered" and taboos are gone.  Somehow I just can't see it.  Maybe their legal system is better than ours, and pedophiles go in and never see the light of day again.  I have a convicted pedophile relative who served his very brief time...he's a trucker and out on the road.  Maybe he lost his puppy today and needs some kids to help him go find it...  He's real, he's out there, he's been punished and then set free...only they don't GET IT.  This is what floats his boat; he is not reformed.  He will most definitely be doing it whenever possible until the day he dies.  And our legal system let him out...because he served his pathetically small time.


There was a news story years ago, maybe from 20/20, where they were concerned about kids protecting themselves through empowerment and training from pedophiles.  Eveyone to do with the news station's kids were encouraged to attend and were thoroughly trained by experts.  Everything went great, right?  No, because what also was part of the deal that the kids weren't told is that they would be tested to see if they would act on what they had learned.  Fake "pedophiles" stalked these kids in full view of hidden cameras...and the kids fell for it.  Someone had a teenage daughter who fell for the "my puppy got lost" thing.  He even brought the leash and collar for added drama...as any decent predator would.  No kids were threatened or exposed to anything remotely scary or creepy...just tested to see how far this empowerment training helped.
 
For the record, I taught my kid everything and I started very young, as things naturally came up.  Just like when I ordered anatomically correct dolls and changed their diapers in front of my son, he got to see that boy babies are different from little girls.  I explain everything to him in my own way...and then he was the one educating all the kids in the neighborhood.  Autism gave him more openness and innocence, but it also gave him more vulnerability and gullibility.  He knew all this, but I didn't rely on information to protect him...I watched him like a hawk.
 
tazzygirl, I respect your right to an opinion and that sometimes we will have to agree to disagree, and I used part of what you said to react to this thread over all, and not just your post. 
 
I talk as much to my son, and as explicitly as I talk here.  When I was training him not to drink out of the milk carton directly...I waited until I caught him in the act and explained to him that we need to make a promise to each other.  That he won't drink directly from it, then I won't either...especially if I have recently given anyone a blow job. [;)]




tazzygirl -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 5:59:08 PM)

A parent should not. While you may not use that ability to lead your children towards ignorance and fear, many others can and have done so. The states decide, based upon government guildlines, what is to be taught. Many of these decisions are made by experts in educational fields, along with parents.




mikeyOfGeorgia -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 6:04:43 PM)

this whole thing makes me rethink my views on home schooling kids. if more people would home school, then this would not be an issue.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 6:04:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

A parent should not.


You are the problem, not the solution.




tazzygirl -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 6:09:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mikeyOfGeorgia

this whole thing makes me rethink my views on home schooling kids. if more people would home school, then this would not be an issue.


I dont know about every state, mikey. But the one i homeschooled had mandatory year end testing. Sex education was part of that testing.




CynthiaWVirginia -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 6:10:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife's partial response to tazzygirl's post

The purpose of sex education is not the prevention of sexual abuse.

While that can be part of it, you seem to believe it should be the focus.

Children should be aware of the dangers but not indoctrinated to the point that they fear anything sexual.



Amen. 
 
Also...not indoctrinated to the point where they think that every adult who is nice to them is secretly a pedophile. 
 
Reduces their only choice for reporting abuse...if their only choices are to talk with someone who isn't nice, or who doesn't like them.




DaddysInkedSlut -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 6:10:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mikeyOfGeorgia

this whole thing makes me rethink my views on home schooling kids. if more people would home school, then this would not be an issue.


I actually did homeschool my children for several yrs but there is more to education than what is taught in the books. Children need to learn to socialize so at a pointed I opted to put them back in public school, however; I am very much an active participant in their education.

And I agree, this is why ALOT of families do choose to home school their children.




DaddysInkedSlut -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 6:12:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: mikeyOfGeorgia

this whole thing makes me rethink my views on home schooling kids. if more people would home school, then this would not be an issue.


I dont know about every state, mikey. But the one i homeschooled had mandatory year end testing. Sex education was part of that testing.



California, Vegas, and Maryland only require you submit either your curriculium or membership to an approved homeschool umbrella. In those states that I lived in and home schooled my children in sex education was NEVER a required part of the home school curriculuim required by those states.




tazzygirl -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 6:13:30 PM)

quote:

I'm sorry to disagree, and we can agree to disagree on this, but simple words do not give a child a sense of self-worth, but...how they are treated does.


No one said it was just words. You do tend to put alot of thought into people's posts, thoughts the poster never presented.

Pedophiles do tend to seek out the most submissive. Making talk of sex taboo is one way of ensuring a child is kept shy around anything sexual.

quote:

Child protective services do the best they can to investigate reportings. This is hard, very difficult, and doesn't have some easy school chat solutions. I'm okay with offering this education in schools, but that parents should have a right to opt out without being called names like accomplices to pedophilia, nor should they have to face legal problems solely because their kid, like many others, got molested and they had been one of the opt out parents. That's shiite. I don't know who brought that up in this thread but whoever did lost some of my respect. Not that it matters, as I don't care if people respect me less as a person for sounding off about all of this


I brought that up, and its not your respect i need or desire. Its the protection of children on every level that i want. Its the ability to educate all children. Not to listen to some parent declare... "No one will teach MY child that besides me". If you are that damn afraid of what they will learn in a classroom, what do you think they are learning from their friends?

quote:

And our legal system let him out...because he served his pathetically small time.



They should never get out, but that isnt the point of this thread. Keeping a child ignorant leads to a greater potential for abuse. The fact that too many parents still do not teach their children sex education has brought all this on.

In order to homeschool, i had to have certain credentials. I also had to agree he would be tested yearly, and not tested by me, but by someone certified to do so by the state. If parents agree to such testing, then i can see the opt out being allowed. But without proof of such an education, then no.




tazzygirl -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 6:16:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: CynthiaWVirginia

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife's partial response to tazzygirl's post

The purpose of sex education is not the prevention of sexual abuse.

While that can be part of it, you seem to believe it should be the focus.

Children should be aware of the dangers but not indoctrinated to the point that they fear anything sexual.



Amen. 
 
Also...not indoctrinated to the point where they think that every adult who is nice to them is secretly a pedophile. 
 
Reduces their only choice for reporting abuse...if their only choices are to talk with someone who isn't nice, or who doesn't like them.


Again, show me where i ever said fear was a part of what they should be taught.




tazzygirl -> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? (7/14/2010 6:31:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddysInkedSlut


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: mikeyOfGeorgia

this whole thing makes me rethink my views on home schooling kids. if more people would home school, then this would not be an issue.


I dont know about every state, mikey. But the one i homeschooled had mandatory year end testing. Sex education was part of that testing.



California, Vegas, and Maryland only require you submit either your curriculium or membership to an approved homeschool umbrella. In those states that I lived in and home schooled my children in sex education was NEVER a required part of the home school curriculuim required by those states.


Option 1. S.C. Code § 59-65-40. Parents “may teach their children at home if the instruction is approved by the district board of trustees.” The boards “shall approve” (they have no discretion) if:
1. the parent has either: (a) at least a high school diploma or GED (the basic skills exam was struck down by the South Carolina Supreme Court—see below); (b) or earned a baccalaureate degree;
2. the instructional day is at least four and one-half hours, and the year at least 180 days;
3. the curriculum includes the required subjects listed above;
4. the parent presents a system of maintaining records as evidence of regular instruction including: a) a plan book or other record of subjects taught and activities, b) a portfolio of the child’s work, and c) a record of academic evaluations, with a semiannual progress report to be submitted to the school district;
5. the student has access to library facilities;
6. the student participates in the annual statewide testing program and the Basic Skills Assessment Program;
7. and the parents release the district from liability regarding their child’s education.

Standardized Tests: All students complying with § 59-65-40 (Option “1” above) must participate in the annual statewide testing program and the Basic Skills Assessment Program, and if they do not perform well enough on the test to meet the public school promotion standard for advancing to the next grade, the school district will decide if they should be put in a public school, receive special handicapped services, or have instructional support for home schooling at the parents’ expense. § 59-65-40(D). The tests must be administered by a “certified school district employee.” Those who enroll in SCAIHS (Option 2) or another home school association (Option 3) are exempt from state testing.

http://homeschooling.about.com/gi/o.htm?zi=1/XJ/Ya&zTi=1&sdn=homeschooling&cdn=education&tm=4&gps=115_134_957_424&f=00&tt=14&bt=0&bts=0&zu=http%3A//www.hslda.org/laws/default.asp%3FState%3DSC




Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.785156E-02