thompsonx -> RE: What would it take to actually secure the border with Mexico? (7/29/2010 4:27:21 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: xBullx quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx quote:
ORIGINAL: xBullx Ok, I've been ponderin' this and I think the only answer is to make Mexico the 51st state. Beggin' the pardon of anyone who may have already mentioned this. That was tried once and shot down in the congress because the bigots thought that that many non white people would "dilute" the purity of the "white race" …it is without example or precedent, wither to hold Mexico as a province, or to incorporate her into our Union. No example of such a line of policy can be found. We have conquered many of the neighboring tribes of Indians, but we have never thought of holding them in subjection—never of incorporating them into our Union. They have either been left as an independent people amongst us, or been driven into the forests. I know further, sir, that we have never dreamt of incorporating into our Union any but the Caucasian race—the free white race. To incorporate Mexico, would be the very first instance of the kind of incorporating an Indian race; for more than half of the Mexicans are Indians, and the other is composed chiefly of mixed tribes. I protest against such a union as that! Ours, sir, is the Government of a white race. The greatest misfortunes of Spanish America are to be traced to the fatal error of placing these colored races on an equality with the white race. That error destroyed the social arrangement which formed the basis of society. The Portuguese and ourselves have escaped—the Portuguese at least to some extent—and we are the only people on this continent which have made revolutions without being followed by anarchy. And yet it is professed and talked about to erect these Mexicans into a Territorial Government, and place them on an equality with the people of the United States. I protest utterly against such a project. Sir, it is a remarkable fact, that in the whole history of man, as far as my knowledge extends, there is no instance whatever of any civilized colored races being found equal to the establishment of free popular government, although by far the largest portion of the human family is composed of these races. And even in the savage state we scarcely find them anywhere with such government, except it be our noble savages—for noble I will call them. They, for the most part, had free institutions, but they are easily sustained among a savage people. Are we to overlook this fact? Are we to associate with ourselves as equals, companions, and fellow-citizens, the Indians and mixed race of Mexico? Sir, I should consider such a thing as fatal to our institutions. Ironically this can be found here http://www.davidduke.com/general/john-c-calhoun-vetoes-annexation-of-mexico_948.html These insecure, self righteous dicks drive me crazy, I suspect they only allow us useless German/Mic/Catholic types in on the white skin technicality then..... Fuck David Duke, just for your knowledge, I support anyone coming here that does it legally, and thereby wants to contribute to the common good. I have posted numerous times that I am not in favor of illegal immigration. I have also pointed out that with the limited resources of the authorities the easiest and least expensive way to stop it is to sanction the employers. Tazzy posted up that if one employes someone who has illegally entered the country that the penality is quite draconian. Something on the order of $250,000 and/or 5 years in the federal pen for each illegal hired. Please note we are not talking about someone who hires someone, in good faith, with what appears to be proper documentation but those who after having been notified by the s/s that the paperwork is suspect do not take the proper measures to remediate the problem.
|
|
|
|