Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 6:01:30 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		[image]http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=44375[/image] is the pic that was in Kens post...same as the post I quoted
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3275828
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3274537
and RMLS post
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3277715

You ignored it, slunk off in denial again



Along with the following information from the site
On Saturday, June 19, 2010, oil spread northeast from the leaking Deepwater Horizon well in the Gulf of Mexico. The oil appears as a maze of silvery-gray ribbons in this photo-like image from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA’s Aqua satellite. The location of the leaking well is marked with a white dot. North of the well, a spot of black may be smoke; reports from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration say that oil and gas continue to be captured and burned as part of the emergency response efforts. The large image provided above is at MODIS’ maximum spatial resolution (level of detail). Twice-daily images of the Gulf of Mexico are available from the MODIS Rapid Response Team in additional resolutions and formats, including a georeferenced version that can be used in Google Earth

< Message edited by Lucylastic -- 7/28/2010 6:04:07 PM >

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 6:21:23 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


You're looking at this from an extremely slanted viewpoint, and seem completely unaware of how blatantly hateful and blindly partisan you are. Get a clue, its not about me - try to discuss the facts of the article, and focus on me a little less if thats possible.



Why's everybody always pickin' on me?



(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 6:23:37 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
Thats a fine strawman Louve00.

You don't know me at all, and you sure as hell don't know me as well as you have convinced yourself that you do.

But at least you can discuss the topic some, which puts you ahead of several others here. For that, kudos.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

Thats just it Sanity.  You think BP's fuck up is a political strategy.  That this was only done to help aid Obama in god knows what.  If you choose to call that blatantly hateful and blindly partisan then what do you want me to admit.  Would you like me to admit I hate BP for not taking the precautions that it should have.  And I'm blind to any partisanship they may have.   It takes alot for me to hate...even BP, believe it or not.  Boycott their products, yes.  Hate them for loving money, no...just feel sorry for them there.  Blindness to partisanship.  Well, since this isn't a pollically motivated happening, the reactions, which may be political, I have nothing to do with. Take all that to BP, who enabled to president to gain off of them, if thats how you're looking at it.  


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Louve00)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 6:28:58 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline 		oh yes she does.

You seem to reveal yourself daily with your fringe stream of consciousness.



< Message edited by Owner59 -- 7/28/2010 6:30:11 PM >

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 6:29:53 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
That sig line is just for you rml, since you seem able to focus only on my shirt.

I like the shirt, and get a ton of cmail telling me how great the photo is.

I see you linked to The Coasters's "Charlie Brown" song. Do you like the Coasters?

Or, more to the point, do you ever feel like it would be nice to reasonably discuss a given topic?

Are you capable of doing that? Or are you limited to commenting on my shirt due to some kind of mental issue.


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


You're looking at this from an extremely slanted viewpoint, and seem completely unaware of how blatantly hateful and blindly partisan you are. Get a clue, its not about me - try to discuss the facts of the article, and focus on me a little less if thats possible.



Why's everybody always pickin' on me?





< Message edited by Sanity -- 7/28/2010 6:38:35 PM >

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 6:37:33 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
I didn't ignore it, I bolded the same part then that I am  bolding below which proves and proved my argument, and I believe I even thanked you for backing me up on it. "The slick is represented by ribbons of oil..." not the entire muddy gulf as domken and Louve00 tried to falsely represent.

Your confusion probably stems from the fact that I typically I ignore you (along with the other haters who are largely incapable of commenting reasonably).


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

[image]http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=44375[/image] is the pic that was in Kens post...same as the post I quoted
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3275828
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3274537
and RMLS post
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3277715

You ignored it, slunk off in denial again



Along with the following information from the site
On Saturday, June 19, 2010, oil spread northeast from the leaking Deepwater Horizon well in the Gulf of Mexico. The oil appears as a maze of silvery-gray ribbons in this photo-like image from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA’s Aqua satellite. The location of the leaking well is marked with a white dot. North of the well, a spot of black may be smoke; reports from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration say that oil and gas continue to be captured and burned as part of the emergency response efforts. The large image provided above is at MODIS’ maximum spatial resolution (level of detail). Twice-daily images of the Gulf of Mexico are available from the MODIS Rapid Response Team in additional resolutions and formats, including a georeferenced version that can be used in Google Earth


< Message edited by Sanity -- 7/28/2010 6:43:55 PM >

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 6:39:31 PM   
flcouple2009


Posts: 2784
Joined: 1/8/2009
Status: offline 		Gotta hand it to you Sanity.

You nicely side stepped the post dealing with amounts of oil rolling around under the water.  As well as the issue of the amount of dispersant used and the toxic effect it may have on the marine life.

BTW the first step in the surface oil disappearing so quickly was breaking it up with the dispersant.  So your going to give Obama a hand for approving the use so much of it at one time?

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 6:42:21 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
The article I linked to addressed the oil under the surface, so why should I waste my time chasing your ridiculous red herrings? Microbes are eating the oil and its really good news. I don't understand why this seems so depressing to all of you, its absolutely driving you crazy and I'd think that you would be cheering about this.

quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

Gotta hand it to you Sanity.

You nicely side stepped the post dealing with amounts of oil rolling around under the water.  As well as the issue of the amount of dispersant used and the toxic effect it may have on the marine life.

BTW the first step in the surface oil disappearing so quickly was breaking it up with the dispersant.  So your going to give Obama a hand for approving the use so much of it at one time?



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 6:42:54 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline 		Depends.....

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 6:53:46 PM   
thornhappy


Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline 		Yeah, it was.  Because I read the source quote and saw it on other sites to boot.
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Thats not domkens pic thornhappy, and you know that.

What I pointed out at the time was that the Gulf water is muddy, and thats what the photo showed. NASA never tried to claim that the muddy water in the Gulf was really oil, that you couldn't see the water for the oil, which was the entire premise for domkens farce from the beginning.

For you to try to claim now that the gulf water was hardly visible over the entire gulf at any time is whats odd, so far from the reality that its beyond laughable, its craziness.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

Are you saying NASA fabricated it? Cause, damn, I've seen you post some crazy shit before but to call that a fabrication is amazing.

Go here for a slide show of photos starting 7/19, straight from the source:
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/oilspill/index.html

BTW, it includes a whole bunch of other imagery data.


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 6:56:07 PM   
flcouple2009


Posts: 2784
Joined: 1/8/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The article I linked to addressed the oil under the surface, so why should I waste my time chasing your ridiculous red herrings? Microbes are eating the oil and its really good news. I don't understand why this seems so depressing to all of you, its absolutely driving you crazy and I'd think that you would be cheering about this.

quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

Gotta hand it to you Sanity.

You nicely side stepped the post dealing with amounts of oil rolling around under the water.  As well as the issue of the amount of dispersant used and the toxic effect it may have on the marine life.

BTW the first step in the surface oil disappearing so quickly was breaking it up with the dispersant.  So your going to give Obama a hand for approving the use so much of it at one time?




Uhmmm no, but thank you for playing.

All the article says is there are THOUSANDS of small patches of oil under the surface,  but hey we don't see them up top so we can say it has disappeared.

There has been an ongoing battle between several scientific groups and BP about those oil plumes under the surface.  BP had been denying once again that there is any problem under the surface.

There is no good news yet.  There is only hopeful news.  There is still much concern over how much oil sank to the bottom and how much is still suspended in the habitat. 

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 7:06:14 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
Okay, maybe it is. I've been looking for domkens thread but don't have the time or the patience tonight to find it.


quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

Yeah, it was.  Because I read the source quote and saw it on other sites to boot.


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to thornhappy)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 7:11:50 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		http://www.collarchat.com/m_3274537/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#3275828
this one???
I posted the link earlier up the page


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 7:18:37 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

All the article says is there are THOUSANDS of small patches of oil under the surface,  but hey we don't see them up top so we can say it has disappeared.

There has been an ongoing battle between several scientific groups and BP about those oil plumes under the surface.  BP had been denying once again that there is any problem under the surface.

There is no good news yet.  There is only hopeful news.  There is still much concern over how much oil sank to the bottom and how much is still suspended in the habitat. 



Out of sight out of mind.

Which has been BP's strategy from the beginning.

Let's not forget Tony Hayward's comments:

On 20 April 2010, an explosion occurred on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, operated by BP. Eleven people were killed in the blast and oil began to leak from the ocean floor at a rate variously estimated to be between 5,000 and 100,000 barrels per day.

 Hayward, and BP in general, initially downplayed the spill, stating on 17 May 2010 that the environmental impact of the Gulf spill would likely be "very very modest" and calling the spill "relatively tiny" in comparison with the size of the ocean.

(Tony Hayward - Wikipedia)





< Message edited by rulemylife -- 7/28/2010 7:19:32 PM >

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 7:25:00 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


That sig line is just for you rml, since you seem able to focus only on my shirt.

I like the shirt, and get a ton of cmail telling me how great the photo is.

I see you linked to The Coasters's "Charlie Brown" song. Do you like the Coasters?

Or, more to the point, do you ever feel like it would be nice to reasonably discuss a given topic?

Are you capable of doing that? Or are you limited to commenting on my shirt due to some kind of mental issue.


Nah!

But I like your tree too.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 7:43:23 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
The picture is nothing, I recommend you go see it in person, in the Hoh rain forest. Its very peaceful. Give yourself two weeks in there at least...

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
Nah!

But I like your tree too.



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 7:50:18 PM   
Brain


Posts: 3792
Joined: 2/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Experts: Gulf of Mexico Oil is Breaking Up


LIARS,

Experts were paid by BP to go to universities and say the oil has disappeared. It hasn't disappeared it’s throughout thousands of square miles throughout the Gulf mixed with the dispersants and because the temperature down there is so cold the oil will be around for decades.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#38458741

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 7:52:47 PM   
Brain


Posts: 3792
Joined: 2/14/2007
Status: offline 		Whistleblower charges the EPA with downplaying the environmental impact of oil disaster - Criminal probe of oil spill to focus on 3 firms and their ties to regulators

A team of federal investigators known as the "BP squad" is assembling in New Orleans to conduct a wide-ranging criminal probe that will focus on at least three companies and examine whether their cozy relations with federal regulators contributed to the oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, according to law enforcement and other sources.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/27/AR2010072706052.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#38458741

BP is under investigation by the SEC the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Jane Luchenko director of the national oceanic and atmospheric administration said that the oil is harder to find but the natural resources Defense Council annual report on beaches found no downturn in the number of beach closures. The NRDC report said the number of beach closures is roughly 10 times more than last year and it predicts the impact will last for years.

The only real purpose of using dispersants with the oil was to cover up the volume of oil that was going into the Gulf released from that well. It is a mechanism for BP to save billions of dollars in fines. The dispersants mixed with the oil is extremely toxic. If they did not use dispersants they would have been able to get that oil.

Experts were paid by BP to go to universities and say the oil has disappeared. It hasn't disappeared it’s throughout thousands of square miles throughout the Gulf mixed with the dispersants and because the temperature down there is so cold the oil will be around for decades.

If they did not use dispersants they would have been able to get most of the oil off of the surface and would not have harmed all of the fish

It is a lie to say that the oil has disappeared. It hasn't disappeared and it will be around for decades.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#38458741


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/28/2010 8:14:15 PM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The picture is nothing, I recommend you go see it in person, in the Hoh rain forest. Its very peaceful. Give yourself two weeks in there at least...




TIME OUT!


I'll bet it is just fucking beautiful there. Two weeks in a place like that could heal a mans soul...


TIME IN!

Back to snarking now.

_____________________________

"If you don't live it, it won't come out your horn." Charlie Parker

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf - 7/29/2010 3:28:01 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
Cue the conspiracy theorists

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

quote:

Experts: Gulf of Mexico Oil is Breaking Up


LIARS,

Experts were paid by BP to go to universities and say the oil has disappeared. It hasn't disappeared it’s throughout thousands of square miles throughout the Gulf mixed with the dispersants and because the temperature down there is so cold the oil will be around for decades.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#38458741


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Brain)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125