Zevar
Posts: 801
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: aldompdx Zevar, I think you might misinterpret my post. I think we agree here. I totally agree with your post #27. Absence of touch is the negative thing, that is the limit, violating the boundary. Good side of boundary = touch. Bad side of boundary = no touch. Accepting and respecting the boundary = choosing fulfillment = my advice. Always wishing for something that is impossible to have; that is self-inflicted emotional pain, romance, or... masochism. Thus your earlier question: why choose a partner incapable of sharing physical intimacy? As you discuss in both your post #27 and #54, the deeper issue is the process by which one gains the capacity to choose fulfillment. The issue is not, "how do I reach you." The issue is, "I recognize and accept that both our hearts already resonate with each other, in our own light of love." Without concern for any distance, both hearts have already reached each other -- because both hearts have always been whole, complete, and the source of feeling fulfilled. The simplest question is this: "Can I accept my own love." Often, a barrier to accepting our own love is trauma. Then, the question becomes, "can I forgive myself, release my pain/anger, and give myself permission to accept my own love." For some, it takes a lifetime. Others find a shorter path to see that their heart has always been whole, and they need not deprive themself of love and fulfillment. When one accepts their own source of love and fulfillment within, then they have something to share, with another resonant heart. That is intimacy. Good Day aldompdx: To begin do know I appreciate you taking time in clarifying your entry #66. Now I will to the best of my ability explain a few points: I believe what transpired, having read your reply, is that your words implied something other than what you now clarified what they meant. It is evident that you took your time to clarify your words which indeed allows for a clearer understanding. Communication does require at times asserted effort in order to clarify what is being said as opposed to what is implied. Factually speaking, implication is an aspect of communication and there are times when what was implied overrules how something is stated. Of course when someone takes the time to clarify their words then that gesture is of great value. It is always important that the underlying meaning comes forth thus allowing for improved communication and a richer understanding between those in conversation. Regarding the issue of intimacy I will say that I do agree with your ideology to a degree. However it is unimportant how I view intimacy as the Op is the only one here that is questioning these issues AND as you pointed out, she will have to come to terms with these issues on an individual basis. I agree. I trust she will do just that. I appreciate your words AND as always it is good to converse with another of like-mindedness. Take care!
|