RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message


BoiJen -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 2:15:59 PM)

What are we up to now? Like 10 people?




laurell3 -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 2:24:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

I agree with Jeffff.





oops.............


LOL

OP x 3 or 4, or who knows....you sockpuppet responses in your own thread and then whine that people don't take you seriously? Come on. Adults do not whine incessently and create other accounts to argue for themselves. Good luck EVER finding someone with that type of garbage. No amount of categories and automation in the world is going to help you until you grow the fuck up.




LaTigresse -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 2:26:20 PM)

Ward.....

I LIKE HER!!!

June




Jeffff -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 2:31:03 PM)

June.

She can be mean!


Ward




lilboycaught -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 2:33:26 PM)

The biggest point against the OPs idea is that it would not be perfect because people would lie.

Do you realize how stupid of an objection that would be?

People at CM can say they're female when they're male. No problem. And vice versa.

People at CM can say they weigh 121 pounds when they really weigh 390. No problem.

People can say they're white when they're black. And vice versa. no problem.

They can lie about their height.

Hell, they can lie about just about anything -- even present a picture of someone they don't even know as themselves.

And yet the OPs idea is somehow worthless because they could lie on this too?




Jeffff -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 2:36:03 PM)

Great, yet another sock puppet.


You should head down to P&R




SorceressJ -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 2:38:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dbloomer

quote:

ORIGINAL: SorceressJ

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

1. All the Dommes reading, if you've gotten at least one nasty message from a polite "No, thank you", please say so.
2. If it's happened more than once, please say so.
3. If you've gotten the nasty stuff from one profile, said "no thank you" and then two months later gotten the same form letter AGAIN, please say so.

boi



1. Yes.
2. Yes. More than once from the same person/username, even. Not only that, I have received the same word-for-word message from the same user having made themselves a different profile.
3. Yes. At the risk of violating TOS, I will of course not name any names, but I am veritably certain that a username I've seen here today looks remarkably familiar in this regard. It went like this: first came the nasty response, then after I blocked him, the repeat visits so I would see him in my "Who's Viewing Me?" section (was this intended to impress?). Finding himself ignored, he got bored and went away, as good trolls do. Fortunately, when he visited my profile this time, he had gained enough gray cells to recognize me and say nothing. Thank you for that. *Big Smile!*


The fact that you didn't point the finger at anyone specifically leaves everyone free to point their finger and believe what they want to, which I'm sure you knew. Now anyone who disagrees with you on any subject is "That guy who was rude to you in a private message." Clever.

Add e-mail verification to Collarme and you'll see the amount of abuse around here reduced dramatically. Ask yourself why practically every other community website out there requires e-mail validation, but Collarme.com doesn't.

This more than anything is the #1 problem here. The reason they don't require e-mail verification is the same reason they don't implement the system we're advocating here of recognizing accounts as professional femdoms.

It will widdle down the userbase THAT much more, reducing the profitability of this place even further.

I will be withdrawing from this thread. Nobody wants to address the core issue. Instead, they want to burn the OP at the stake and pat eachother on the back, with some strange gang mentality.

As a final note, you might ask yourself WHY you receive so many angry posts from sub men looking for dommes, and you might consider the possibiltiy that a better system for maching subs with doms may actually result in more suitable matches for YOU, and a much happier inbox.





1) That's "whittle", not widdle. Yes actually, I am not a genius nor all-seeing but I am reasonably clever. Thank you for noticing.
2) not looking for a 'match', just responding to a post. It strikes me as mildly amusing that my response in particular seems to have striken a nerve here. *considers this*
3) not obliged to consider ANYthing that I do not agree with. I'm an adult and have earned this prerogative. A polite "no thank you" should in fact be enough in any and all cases where it was or is offered.
4) I happen to concur with the thinly-veiled opinion voiced here that you and the original OP are in fact one and the same.
5) *DING!!!* I think we have a weiner..




lilboycaught -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 2:44:14 PM)

People




laurell3 -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 2:46:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

June.

She can be mean!


Ward


I don't like stupid people. You can beat me for it later.....please?




Jeffff -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 2:47:46 PM)

Of course, you deserve a reward!




SorceressJ -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 2:48:55 PM)

People. Less tasty than cheap supermarket sushi platters, just as liable to be toxic.




Lockit -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 2:48:58 PM)

Boy oh boy... three of the male posters have profiles that cannot be found. Stand up and stand behind what you say.

No system change to the format of how CM works would change a lot. People would simply cover up certain information that you would get later in messenger. lol For each thing found to stop the masses from doing something bad... a solution is found so people can get around it. Kind of like many profiles or hidden profiles. How about working into the perfect system that you cannot have more than one and cannot hide it? Silly in my opinion, because they could just get a second or third computer or IP... go to mom's house or leave mom's house and go to dad's or even a dates house... hey babe, mind if I check my email?

You want a perfect web site, create one. I hardly think most could do that when they can't even get out from behind a hidden profile or multiple one's to prove a point. You have to be made of sterner stuff than that chicken shit.




SorceressJ -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:03:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tantriqu

1. Hella yes, dozens of different ones, yet each with uniquely detailed threats of prolonged physical torture, sexual and other mutilation, forced pregnancy/prostitution/rape/sodomy, and death. Christ, put them all together, and you've got a Margaret Atwood novel! So, as someone mentioned above, I've stopped giving polite 'no, thanks', and just block and delete unless the message is from a male sub. Life's too short to read sociopathic ravings and /or unsolicited Aspbergeric flames from comp-sci types poisoned by vanilla-porn-fuelled impossiblities.
2. Hella yes, and also as someone mentioned above, frequently hidden under a new profile. Male switches, doms and female subs posting 'on behalf of their dom' are the foulest-mouthed. Ai yai yai. Dommes just tend to be verbal bullies, rather than detailing physical threats.
3. Yes to more contact months later under different profiles, no to a form letter.



*LOVES* this response. Did you get the one from the guy that wants you to come to Egypt, marry him, and herd his goats? Srsly. I've gotten that one twice..




Fejjjj -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:05:35 PM)

I am new here but I'd just like to say, that guy Jeffff sounds like a splendid fellow.

Ebony Wood too!


I think the OP is joshing us.


Is that phrase too harsh? I don't want to sound harsh. I am new and all.




Jeffff -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:07:22 PM)

Welcome to the boards Fejjjj


Great first post!


Try not to be a douche.




Aileen1968 -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:09:34 PM)

I am new tooo!!!!!
Give me money!


Hahahaha....I was supposed to post that with my new account. Hold on a sec.




LadyHibiscus -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:09:35 PM)

Okay, how about if ALL OF US just started asking for monies? Or beef sandwiches, or dark chocolate kitkat bars or whatever your currency happens to be? Why not level the playing field in the most logical way?

A chocolate Napoleon. I wants one now!! (that is a pastry, not Domi's cousin)




Fejjjj -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:10:54 PM)

Thanks Jeffff!

I can tell already you are a prince among men.




neelia8691 -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:11:10 PM)

I am new tooo!!!!
Give me money.

(There. That's better)




BoiJen -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:11:30 PM)

Can we get this thread renamed "Sock puppets run amok"?

I just think it's better suited.




Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875