RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message

BoiJen -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:41:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious
In my experience no woman likes to hear a man talk to another woman like that, no matter who the other woman is.



That's because women know that, eventually, they become the person being targeted for such nastiness.



dbloomer -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:43:29 PM)

quote:


While I'm not the one who posted (or am I?), I'd gather to say you're a "weiner" because you absolutely refuse to see the fallacy in your arguments and the flaws in your plan, no matter who points them out or how, not because there's a disagreement.




Nobody has provided me with ANY counter-arguments that exist within the realm of common sense when it comes to the subject of the original post. The only people who HAVE taken an opposed view to me are WOMEN who clearly don't see any value in making things better for men here, with the exception of I think 1 or 2 male doms who ALSO have no vested interest in seeing this feature added.

I'm OVERJOYED this thread exists. It's my hope it will reveal the true colors regarding the type of people this website attracts and the childish intolerance it fosters. I've got people calling me a whiny fucktard and a weiner because me and the various other men who've posted here want a feature added that has NOTHING to do with you.



laurell3 -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:44:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dbloomer

And, while we're taking the gloves off, I'd NEVER pm a 43 year old woman.



Great we've already established your views are unintelligent, now we know they are shallow as well. Did you want a cookie for that little boy? It's rather odd how you can point out when you believe someone else is being rude, but yet don't recognize the same ridiculous and immature behavior that you constantly put forth.

The bottom line is this. There will always be scammers and pros no matter what categories or countermeasures are put in place. The amount of time people spend whining about this is a good indication of why they don't have partners.



BoiJen -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:44:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dbloomer

Nobody has provided me with ANY counter-arguments that exist within the realm of common sense when it comes to the subject of the original post. The only people who HAVE taken an opposed view to me are WOMEN who clearly don't see any value in making things better for men here, with the exception of I think 1 or 2 male doms who ALSO have no vested interest in seeing this feature added.

I'm OVERJOYED this thread exists. It's my hope it will reveal the true colors regarding the type of people this website attracts and the childish intolerance it fosters. I've got people calling me a whiny fucktard and a weiner because me and the various other men who've posted here want a feature added that has NOTHING to do with you.



You haven't been paying attention, have you?



dbloomer -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:44:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

quote:

ORIGINAL: dbloomer

Looking at your above post, which is that of a 43-year old woman, calling me a "weiner" because I disagree with you, I think it's VERY clear why we don't get along better than we do.
It was a *play on words*. You may have come across the concept before. I don't consider that 'gloves off' at all, whereas your comment in response was just unpleasant.

I'm not going to tell you to 'be nice' or anything, but it's probably a good thing you aren't looking for a partner here. In my experience no woman likes to hear a man talk to another woman like that, no matter who the other woman is.



I'm generally courteous and polite to people deserving of it. It should not come as a shock to ANYONE that a 27 year old man doesn't want to date a 43 old woman. If you want to make some rediculous cause out of it, be my guest.




dbloomer -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:46:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: laurell3


quote:

ORIGINAL: dbloomer

And, while we're taking the gloves off, I'd NEVER pm a 43 year old woman.



Great we've already established your views are unintelligent, now we know they are shallow as well. Did you want a cookie for that little boy?


The only reason YOU showed up is to hop on the bandwagon. You, to the best of my knowledge, have not even addressed the original concept behind this post. Why should I put any stock in what you say?



BoiJen -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:48:51 PM)

For the same reason you've ignored all of the counterarguments against your "brilliance"...because we feel like it.

boi



dbloomer -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:49:03 PM)

quote:


You haven't been paying attention, have you?



Yes, your primary argument is that the original poster is a fool for trying to discuss an idea that would affect CM on the CM forum, with it's other users. This is, obviously, a silly argument. When we reveal it as a silly argument, you rally behind the rest of your peers here and take an endless slew of cheap-shots on me. I've been following along just fine.



laurell3 -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:50:50 PM)

Now you're a mind reader. Apparently you don't read well though. "To the best of your knowlege", now you're too lazy to actually read a few posts? It isn't like it's hidden. I did voice my opinion on it. No matter what this site or any site does there will always be people whining that it's not enough. I'd sure like to see some of the asshats in my mailbox that cannot read a 2 line profile gone. I'd like to see some of the unstable people that frequent these forums that I worry about in "the lifestyle" gone as well. I'd like alot of things. I'm sure there are many single people out there that have their own lists as well. What are the odds that one site can accomodate all those things?

For the third time, the reality is that the search is not easy for ANYONE. Get over yourself and stop pointing fingers. Yes, it takes patience, effort and intelligence. So do relationships. Consider it a precursor to what people can expect when they do find a partner and stop the incessent bitchy self-defensive garbage and whining.



dbloomer -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:51:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

For the same reason you've ignored all of the counterarguments against your "brilliance"...because we feel like it.

boi



Great, now we've gotten down to the truth of the matter. You're doing whatever you feel like. Fine. Don't expect indulging your every whim to be useful to anyone but yourself.

The original poster proposed an idea that is ALSO self-indulgant, but also provides a benefit to a substantial group of other people and thus actually has merit.

As for me being the 2 or other 3 male subs who showed up here to agree, and who's opinions actually MATTER on this subject, and the notion that they're me making other accounts. That is just proof that people see what they want to see.



VaguelyCurious -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:51:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dbloomer

It should not come as a shock to ANYONE that a 27 year old man doesn't want to date a 43 old woman.
And that's your prerogative. It's not particularly suave to be rude about it, though.

As an aside, you're kind of a drama queen. 'Taking the gloves off''? 'Snooping'? 'Standing up for what [you] believe in'? Revealing the 'true colours' of us terrible posters?

As I said before, I suspect you may be taking this thread a lot more seriously than anybody else here.



BoiJen -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:52:59 PM)

You missed the part where I encouraged the OP to contact CM about volunteering to implement a screening process and wished him good luck considering that the vast majority of Cm members aren't banging down doors to get the same system implemented. You seem to be confused that just because a small group of folks wants something on a privately owned site, that the owners should them obliged to meet your demands. This isn't the case. You would need drastic numbers of folks writing CM daily to get the changes you want. I've stated all of this before.

When pointing out the flaws in your plan about a flagging or rating system, you simply ignore the comments. Hell, you've ignored that people are less rational when it comes to sex and relationships and personal feelings than business transactions this whole time.

But thank you for answering...no, you haven't been following along. That or you have some sever early onset dementia.

boi



dbloomer -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:53:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: laurell3

Now you're a mind reader. Apparently you don't read well though. "To the best of your knowlege", now you're too lazy to actually read a few posts? It isn't like it's hidden. I did voice my opinion on it. No matter what this site or any site does there will always be people whining that it's not enough. I'd sure like to see some of the asshats in my mailbox that cannot read a 2 line profile gone. I'd like to see some of the unstable people that frequent these forums that I worry about in "the lifestyle" gone as well. I'd like alot of things. I'm sure there are many single people out there that have their own lists as well. What are the odds that one site can accomodate all those things?

For the third time, the reality is that the search is not easy for ANYONE. Get over yourself and stop pointing fingers. Yes, it takes patience, effort and intelligence. So do relationships. Consider it a precursor to what people can expect when they do find a partner and stop the incessent bitchy self-defensive garbage and whining.


So, in a nutshell your argument is: "Good ideas should be ignored because nothing is perfect."



laurell3 -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:55:07 PM)

Your idea would do NOTHING to keep the scammers and pros from being in all categories. If you haven't noticed, many of them ain't exactly rule followers, thus the complaints about them.



VaguelyCurious -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:55:27 PM)

FR: as of now this thread has had 1,768 hits. There have been, what, four, five men coming forward supporting the idea?

That's a lot of people reading your words and choosing to ignore them, dbloomer...



Fejjjj -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:56:15 PM)

I find scammer and whiners to be two sides of the same coin.



laurell3 -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:56:18 PM)

Hey while we're at whiney wishes, could we change the miserable white on black format so I can post without getting migraines? THANKS!



Elisabella -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:56:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dbloomer

The fact that you didn't point the finger at anyone specifically leaves everyone free to point their finger and believe what they want to, which I'm sure you knew. Now anyone who disagrees with you on any subject is "That guy who was rude to you in a private message." Clever.

Add e-mail verification to Collarme and you'll see the amount of abuse around here reduced dramatically. Ask yourself why practically every other community website out there requires e-mail validation, but Collarme.com doesn't.

This more than anything is the #1 problem here. The reason they don't require e-mail verification is the same reason they don't implement the system we're advocating here of recognizing accounts as professional femdoms.

It will widdle down the userbase THAT much more, reducing the profitability of this place even further.

I will be withdrawing from this thread. Nobody wants to address the core issue. Instead, they want to burn the OP at the stake and pat eachother on the back, with some strange gang mentality.

As a final note, you might ask yourself WHY you receive so many angry posts from sub men looking for dommes, and you might consider the possibiltiy that a better system for maching subs with doms may actually result in more suitable matches for YOU, and a much happier inbox.



The part I bolded IS the "core issue." This site is free to use with revenue (to pay for bandwidth) coming from advertising. If the advertising stops, do you expect the site owner to pay out of pocket to keep CM going? Do you have any idea how much bandwidth a site like this must use?

If you don't like the way this site is run, there are other sites. Fetlife and Bondage.com are the first two that come to mind. There are probably smaller femdom-oriented sites too. There's also (gasp) real life BDSM events. I'm not saying "like it or gtfo" I'm just saying, if you genuinely feel this site does not meet your dating needs it's in your own interest to put effort into searching for a site that does meet your needs rather than wasting that effort trying to "fix" this one.

Just to attempt to break through your self-centered bubble...you think you shouldn't have to waste your time looking through profiles of people who don't suit you. Do you know how much mail I got that didn't suit me when I was single? Do you have any idea? And when I was single I had a detailed profile describing the type of man I was looking for and I still got random bullshit.

I think every single woman on this site gets an inbox full of stupid shit she doesn't want to read. Please explain to me how YOU getting a message from a pro when your profile says you're not into pros is ANY different from a woman who gets a message from someone who wants to be her house bitch when her profile says she wants a man who is employed.

ITS THE SAME FUCKING THING.

You seem to think that 'money' makes it some special category of incompatibility. It's not. If you want to relegate pros to a specific section, okay, fine, then we'll make a specific section for "employed men" and "unemployed men" LOL see how well that goes over eh?



BoiJen -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:57:00 PM)

TADA!

http://stagevu.com/video/mzgyewvruodv



VideoAdminTheta -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 3:57:52 PM)

I don't have time to go through this whole thread seeking the name calling comments or anything else that needs to be removed.

Please stop any name calling that is going on. You may attack an idea or a post, but not the poster.

I will be back to check the thread and if the name calling continues; you will have mail.

Thank you



Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875