RE: Proposition C in Missouri (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


kdsub -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/4/2010 12:20:36 PM)

I’d like to see Missourians have the right to opt out…Why could not our government present a healthcare plan that could stand on its own with voluntary participation at an affordable price?

But..... then stop aiding those that choose not to participate… If they show up at the emergency room without private or public insurance give them directions to the local Republican National Headquarters for treatment.

Butch




joether -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/4/2010 1:11:07 PM)

Have you ever been in catastropic pain before kdsub? And have no insurance to pay for the treatment to either allivate the suffering, or fix the issue, what ever it is? No!

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
I’d like to see Missourians have the right to opt out…Why could not our government present a healthcare plan that could stand on its own with voluntary participation at an affordable price?


They can opt out, voluntarily. Just pay the fee, and one can be without insurance. Not a wise idea. But then, a fool is soon parted with his money; as the saying goes.




kdsub -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/4/2010 2:28:07 PM)

You miss my point joe...Those that want to buy in OK do it...then they will not be in pain without insurance...those that don't too damn bad for them right.

Right now hospitals can't deny emergency care... I say let the dumb ass adults of legal age, who don't want to pay for insurance, suffer.

If the government option turns out to be better than the strictly voluntary option then it will become the norm…if it turns out to not be viable then it can be discarded.

Oh you say...what of the poor and disenfranchised ..well what are their options under the existing Obama plan? Will they be required to pay for insurance and if not how is it any different than now.

Butch




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/4/2010 2:29:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff


"Never in the history of our country has government required, you have to buy a product, any product, with your own money against your will," says State Senator Jane Cunningham one of the sponsors of the legislation which ultimately became Prop-C.

Read more: http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/08/03/missouri-vote-a-referendum-on-health-care/#ixzz0vejHpMk3


The State Government of Illinois requires any driver to buy auto insurance.


Been there done that. The key word is "driver".




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/4/2010 2:32:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

Point taken.

Although I am not sure that the law says you have to buy it.

Will Bill Gates or Warren Buffet have to buy it?




Nope, you dont HAVE to buy it. You just pay a fine if you dont. LMAO.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/4/2010 2:34:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

I’d like to see Missourians have the right to opt out…Why could not our government present a healthcare plan that could stand on its own with voluntary participation at an affordable price?



Because in their shell game they need healthy lives to buy coverage they dont need to subsidize everyone elses premium and they can say "see, we told you premiums would go down".




kdsub -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/4/2010 2:43:44 PM)

So you agree with Obama...it would work then... premiums would go down. Is that not the point of the whole thing?

Butch




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/4/2010 2:55:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

So you agree with Obama...it would work then... premiums would go down. Is that not the point of the whole thing?

Butch



LOL. Love to get you in a 3 card monte game.

TOTAL premiums dont go down, TOTAL premiums go up. The AVERAGE premium goes down because some people are forced to overpay.




Jeffff -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/4/2010 2:59:50 PM)

That's the whole theory behind group insurance. The larger the group the lower the individual premiums.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/4/2010 3:14:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

That's the whole theory behind group insurance. The larger the group the lower the individual premiums.



It has nothing to do with the size of the group, but how detailed the underwritting is.

Eg some auto policies rate by zip code, others by broader geography. When there is rating by zip code there is far less subsidization of the high risk areas.

Simple Obamacare example:

Before: Healthy 25 yo pays nothing now, average 40 year old pays $9,000 a year, his true premium.
After: Healthy 25 yo is forced to pay $3,000 a year when his true premium would be $1,000. 40 year olds premium goes down to $8,000 a year.

Result: Total over charging of $1,000, plus a $1,000 subsidy for the 40 year, both paid for by the 25 yo.


Shell game that has done nothing to improve health care.





pahunkboy -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/4/2010 3:23:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

So you agree with Obama...it would work then... premiums would go down. Is that not the point of the whole thing?

Butch



LOL. Love to get you in a 3 card monte game.

TOTAL premiums dont go down, TOTAL premiums go up. The AVERAGE premium goes down because some people are forced to overpay.


LOL-  so much of the world IS a 3 card monte.




joether -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/4/2010 3:25:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
Before: Healthy 25 yo pays nothing now, average 40 year old pays $9,000 a year, his true premium.
After: Healthy 25 yo is forced to pay $3,000 a year when his true premium would be $1,000. 40 year olds premium goes down to $8,000 a year.

Result: Total over charging of $1,000, plus a $1,000 subsidy for the 40 year, both paid for by the 25 yo.


Shell game that has done nothing to improve health care.


Yes, if only the health care system was so.....simple. You would be correct. Unfortunately, it is not simple. Since, now:

A) That 25 year old, could opt out of health coverage all together by paying $750/year.

B) Could be paid for under their parent's health insurance for another year, and pay.....(drum roll)....NOTHING!

C) Third, if that 25 year old, works full time with a company, that has a health care plan. He himself, wouldn't pay for it (but would still pay co-pays).

D) Or last, the 25 year old, could pay a $3000/year health insurance, and not bother to look around for any alternatives (which exists in every state of the Union).

And your numbers, are actually incorrect as well, but that is a minor issue. I think 'A-D' better explain the improvements to the health care system. And yes, it could be better then it is now, no doubt about that.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/4/2010 3:34:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
Before: Healthy 25 yo pays nothing now, average 40 year old pays $9,000 a year, his true premium.
After: Healthy 25 yo is forced to pay $3,000 a year when his true premium would be $1,000. 40 year olds premium goes down to $8,000 a year.

Result: Total over charging of $1,000, plus a $1,000 subsidy for the 40 year, both paid for by the 25 yo.


Shell game that has done nothing to improve health care.


Yes, if only the health care system was so.....simple. You would be correct. Unfortunately, it is not simple. Since, now:

A) That 25 year old, could opt out of health coverage all together by paying $750/year.

B) Could be paid for under their parent's health insurance for another year, and pay.....(drum roll)....NOTHING!

C) Third, if that 25 year old, works full time with a company, that has a health care plan. He himself, wouldn't pay for it (but would still pay co-pays).

D) Or last, the 25 year old, could pay a $3000/year health insurance, and not bother to look around for any alternatives (which exists in every state of the Union).

And your numbers, are actually incorrect as well, but that is a minor issue. I think 'A-D' better explain the improvements to the health care system. And yes, it could be better then it is now, no doubt about that.


I said simple example...substitute a 30 year old and most of your bullshit goes away.

Simple fact for a simple mind: There is nothing in Obamacare that improves the health care system. It is an insurance bill that will do nothing for overall health.




truckinslave -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/4/2010 3:44:56 PM)

quote:

Maybe because if you fall down and crack you head the governement mandates that the emergency room patch you back together. Since the government and your fellow tax payers will be picking up that tab if you don't have insurance, just maybe they expect have a voice in how that bill gets paid.


The way to handle this situation in a free society is:

1. Do not patch the cracked head of anyone not demonstrating an ability to pay
A. The availability of voluntarily contributed funds constitutes an ability to pay.




tazzygirl -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/4/2010 5:47:44 PM)

quote:

A) That 25 year old, could opt out of health coverage all together by paying $750/year.


Thats only for the first year. After that, the amount goes up.




pahunkboy -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/4/2010 5:58:03 PM)

Those rotten infidel; MOS!

I say we should send troops.  They must OBEY NWO/GS/JPM!

think of the AIG- bail out.  AIG is an insurance company.   hint- they are not solvent.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/4/2010 7:13:52 PM)

The most interesting thing about this referendum is the turnout. In 102 degree heat, close to a million voted. That is more than ever voted in any non-Presidential primary and almost as many as the 2008 Presidential primary.

And some in the other thread dont think there is going to be record turnout in Nov??? LMAO




joether -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/5/2010 11:41:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
Before: Healthy 25 yo pays nothing now, average 40 year old pays $9,000 a year, his true premium.
After: Healthy 25 yo is forced to pay $3,000 a year when his true premium would be $1,000. 40 year olds premium goes down to $8,000 a year.

Result: Total over charging of $1,000, plus a $1,000 subsidy for the 40 year, both paid for by the 25 yo.


Shell game that has done nothing to improve health care.


Yes, if only the health care system was so.....simple. You would be correct. Unfortunately, it is not simple. Since, now:

A) That 25 year old, could opt out of health coverage all together by paying $750/year.

B) Could be paid for under their parent's health insurance for another year, and pay.....(drum roll)....NOTHING!

C) Third, if that 25 year old, works full time with a company, that has a health care plan. He himself, wouldn't pay for it (but would still pay co-pays).

D) Or last, the 25 year old, could pay a $3000/year health insurance, and not bother to look around for any alternatives (which exists in every state of the Union).

And your numbers, are actually incorrect as well, but that is a minor issue. I think 'A-D' better explain the improvements to the health care system. And yes, it could be better then it is now, no doubt about that.


I said simple example...substitute a 30 year old and most of your bullshit goes away.

Simple fact for a simple mind: There is nothing in Obamacare that improves the health care system. It is an insurance bill that will do nothing for overall health.


The problem you fail to realize is, the health care problem *ISNT* simple. To reduce it down, would be like saying a triple-by-pass surgery operation is just like setting a broken arm. The two are a world apart. The only sort of people that wouldn't know the difference, are the ignorant and uneducated.

Right now, that is what alot of conservatives seem to be at the moment. They couldn't understand the health care reform. What was in it, what is not in it, nor understand the lies (open and subtle) from Fox News. I chatted with folks at one rally about it. They actually did not bother to read what the bill would have in it or not. They said, they didn't have the time to read it, BUT, were hanging at a rally for it, for ten hours (took me only three hours to read it). What these people said to me, was simple: they are lazy, ignorant, and all together useless citizens.

Sure, lets redo it, and put a '30 year old' in to the mix, instead of a 25 year old:

A) Would still be correct

B) Since they are now over the age of 26, under the law, could not use their parent's health insurance

C) Would still be correct

D) Would still be correct

So if you count, 1/4, as "most of your bullshit goes away", I think you should go back to 2nd grade, and re-learn your fractions. As, 'Most', would be a number HIGHER, then 2/4ths (or 1/2). So no, my arguement isn't bullshit.

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
Simple fact for a simple mind: There is nothing in Obamacare that improves the health care system. It is an insurance bill that will do nothing for overall health.


You can thank your conservative Republicans buddies, for screwing around with a good system. The original idea, was pretty damn good for America. Then, Republicans (who are selfish and greedy), wanted to fight it every step of the way. Big or small. Make it, the 'President's Waterloo'. They tried EVERYTHING, in the book, to stop it. And FAILED! But, they did manage to hack away alot of good thngs, that would have done good for the citizens of the nation.

So yes, if your bitchy about it....blame the correct people: Republican Party.




kdsub -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/5/2010 12:04:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether



The problem you fail to realize is, the health care problem *ISNT* simple.



Joe...why?....the answers are simple and should be... I am not criticizing any view but to me special interests, either political or medical , are making something simple complicated.

It should be… your sick… your medical bills are covered… All you need is one agency controlled by voters to determine what is and how much is covered …or the ability to find this information up front and choose competitively from private insurers.

Plain and simple.

Butch




slvemike4u -> RE: Proposition C in Missouri (8/5/2010 12:19:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

their parisan loathing for the man in the Oval Office leads them to demonize a service none of them would be caught sick without.


I wouldn't be caught anywhere without a car.
I wouldn't be caught in any big city without my (heavily customized) 1911A1.
I don't want to buy them for other people either.
Must be partisan loathing. Or racism.

I mean, seriously, dude.... jump to simplified Daily Kos conclusions much?
When quoting me please do not snip me .
Interesting that you have chosen to be honest about it and admit that it is about your own small minded disregard for your fellow citizens.Most of your brethren are cloaking it in the distaste of having the Fed force them to purchase Health Care.I find your honesty concerning your inhumanity refreshing in a repulsive sort of way.
Nice to hear a prick simply declare himself to be a prick,rather than the usual shuck and jive you guys do [8|]




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875