RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


tazzygirl -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 10:45:45 AM)

quote:

Why isn't there a fence being built between Canada and the US? They have come here illegally too, for crying out loud. I can tell you why, because Mexicans are a different color and they speak a different language, and they have a far different culture than Canadians.


Population of Canada

33,212,696 (2008)

The Urban Institute estimates "between 65,000 and 75,000 undocumented Canadians currently live in the United States."[15]


Population of Mexico

109,995,400 (2008)

According to a Pew Hispanic Center report, in 2005, 57% of illegal immigrants were from Mexico; 24% were from other Latin American countries, primarily from Central America;[3] 9% were from Asia; 6% were from Europe; and 4% were from the rest of the world.[3]

Mexico 6,570,000
El Salvador 510,000

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigration_to_the_United_States

57% are from Mexico. The next hightest is El Salvador which is estimated to be 4%.

And you wonder why we dont fixate on Canada???

This has nothing to do with color, as much as you may wish to disbelieve that. Thats like saying we are targeting a jewish neighbor hood for rapes is only racially motivated while ignoring that 57% of the rapes occured in that neighborhood.




tazzygirl -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 10:48:44 AM)

quote:

Be prepared to pay a lot more to get your car washed, your yard landscaped, and for produce at your local market once we stop the flow, I welcome paying more to stop the exploitation, but something tells me that the very people pissing and moaning about illegals are going to be the same ones pissing and moaning about paying more for their lettuce


And i notice that this argument os only being presented by those who are in gfavor of granting citizenship or legal status across the board.

I dont mind paying more for what i have to ensure it was done legally and humanely.

As far as the drug excuse.... quit doing drugs. simple as that.




juliaoceania -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 10:49:53 AM)

quote:

As far as the drug excuse.... quit doing drugs. simple as that.


Tazzy, are you insinuating I use drugs?




tazzygirl -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 10:50:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

The thing that gives me the impression that you are reactionary in your posts is that you do not seem interested in sustainable solutions to the problem, only in reiterating it and building walls, as if that will make it go away...

A wall isn't going to stop rich people from getting visas so they can do what you outline in your article, yet I see nothing but unsustainable solutions from you. And BTW, changing the constitution isn't going to happen. More people are against it than for it, so advocating changing the constitution is like advocating for an Act of God to stop illegal immigration, even if 75% of the people agreed with you it is a time consuming process full of pitfalls and problems


Who said i was in favor of a wall?




juliaoceania -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 10:51:37 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

The thing that gives me the impression that you are reactionary in your posts is that you do not seem interested in sustainable solutions to the problem, only in reiterating it and building walls, as if that will make it go away...

A wall isn't going to stop rich people from getting visas so they can do what you outline in your article, yet I see nothing but unsustainable solutions from you. And BTW, changing the constitution isn't going to happen. More people are against it than for it, so advocating changing the constitution is like advocating for an Act of God to stop illegal immigration, even if 75% of the people agreed with you it is a time consuming process full of pitfalls and problems


Who said i was in favor of a wall?



If you are not in favor of the wall, my memory is incorrect.... changing the 14th Amendment is not going to happen either.




tazzygirl -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 10:52:57 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

As far as the drug excuse.... quit doing drugs. simple as that.


Tazzy, are you insinuating I use drugs?


Did i state you did?

Im saying you are advocating the legalization of drugs. If people stopped using, there wouldnt be a reason to advocate the legalization.




tazzygirl -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 10:54:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

The thing that gives me the impression that you are reactionary in your posts is that you do not seem interested in sustainable solutions to the problem, only in reiterating it and building walls, as if that will make it go away...

A wall isn't going to stop rich people from getting visas so they can do what you outline in your article, yet I see nothing but unsustainable solutions from you. And BTW, changing the constitution isn't going to happen. More people are against it than for it, so advocating changing the constitution is like advocating for an Act of God to stop illegal immigration, even if 75% of the people agreed with you it is a time consuming process full of pitfalls and problems


Who said i was in favor of a wall?



If you are not in favor of the wall, my memory is incorrect.... changing the 14th Amendment is not going to happen either.


What you have said is that because im not in favor of these people coming here to drop babies for citizenship is because im racist.

And thats a load of bullshit.




juliaoceania -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 10:59:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

As far as the drug excuse.... quit doing drugs. simple as that.


Tazzy, are you insinuating I use drugs?


Did i state you did?

Im saying you are advocating the legalization of drugs. If people stopped using, there wouldnt be a reason to advocate the legalization.


It was the way you said it... I DON'T use drugs.

I am against prohibition because people simply won't stop using drugs, ever. It is a corrupting influence on society that does nothing to stop the behavior of individuals who want to use them. We are causing problems on many fronts from an ill-advised vice policy. We are spending literally trillions of dollars on housing criminals, increased law enforcement, and the illegal gang activity that we are trying to stem at the border.

Part of the reason we can't stop people from coming over the border is that we are more concerned about the criminal element coming over than the workers who make their way here.

Beyond all of that, what happens when Mexico has no government in place, which could EASILY happen. Do we start accepting refugees from Mexico? We pressure other countries to aid refugees, but will we? Especially when we caused their problems in the first place because our people like to get high.




tazzygirl -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 11:10:05 AM)

We have enough trouble feeding and housing our own homeless without trying to feed and house the world. When our own are taken care of, then we can look outwards.




juliaoceania -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 12:21:35 PM)

Then we shouldn't expect other countries to offer safe harbor for people they aren't responsible for... when we aren't willing to do so ourselves after we caused the problem in the first place




vincentML -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 1:21:55 PM)

quote:

I am against prohibition because people simply won't stop using drugs, ever. It is a corrupting influence on society that does nothing to stop the behavior of individuals who want to use them. We are causing problems on many fronts from an ill-advised vice policy. We are spending literally trillions of dollars on housing criminals, increased law enforcement, and the illegal gang activity that we are trying to stem at the border.


Liquor Prohibition bore fruit in the establishment of the Mafia families who took their winnings and built a little town out in the desert called Las Vegas. A fascinating and entertaining book .... Last Call: the rise and fall of Prohibition by Daniel Okrent.

Prohibition was spurred by an admittedly uncountable number of seedy saloons, especially in the urban areas where all those swarthy immigrants lived around the turn of the Century.

The Volstead Act contained some great loopholes: 1. sacramental wines - Napa Valley Farmers did well; 2. industrial alcohol - poisoned by Law, passed on anyway; 3. Medicinal use - with a Rx - Walgreens grew from 20 stores to over 500 and every little shop suddenly became a 'drug store;' 4. home brewing - yeast was highly in demand.

OMG, the Detroit River was choked with little boats running back and forth to Canada. Of course Canada wisely collected an export tax.

Prohibition.... what a joke..... War on Drugs .... what a joke. Just sayin.....[:)]




vincentML -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 1:23:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

We have enough trouble feeding and housing our own homeless without trying to feed and house the world. When our own are taken care of, then we can look outwards.


Honestly, with all the Ag subsidies from the Federal Govt and all the food we export.... I don't understand this. I am not disputing it... I just don't understand why it is so.




StrangerThan -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 2:57:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

Bullshit.

Fences aren't built along the Canadian border because millions of Canadians aren't flooding the country. In fact, Canada probably has to worry more about illegal immigration from the US than vice-versa. I worked there for 5 years and carried a Canadian work permit. I had to go through immigration each time, stand in line for hours sometimes, produce my documentation, provide a copy of some nafta letter, pay my fee. A friend of mine who does the same work, didn't want to bother with getting the work permit, lied about the reason she was entering the country, was caught and banned for a year. The legal ramifications at the time included 10 years in prison and a rather large fine.

This has nothing to do with their fucking skin color. It has a lot to do with the en masse invasion. I am, by far, not against people south of the border coming to the US to work. I am not against people trying to better their lives, or in some cases, survive. The problem I do have is that we can't seem to figure out a viable solution to the problem and it is a problem. In actuality, the fix is fairly simple. Target those who hire them with prison terms and fines. Fix the work visa system.

The problem I have with the entire thing is one side wants to throw them all out, the other does nothing but endlessly wring their hands and concoct reasons why it isn't a problem, and even if it was, why we can;t fix it.



I find it amusing how you ignored my ways of fixing the problem.... which are more rational than yours when you get right down to it. One addresses the problem at its root, the other just patches the hole temporarily until another leak springs up....


You're right. I did forget to mention that you had a fix. More rational? Not so much, but my apologies for not addressing the things you said.

Maybe it was the commune with the blood-soaked palin image that tossed it out the window.






juliaoceania -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 3:00:31 PM)

quote:

Maybe it was the commune with the blood-soaked palin image that tossed it out the window.


Huh?




Lucylastic -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 5:28:00 PM)

http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/bestoftv/2010/08/10/ac.birth.terroism.tourists.cnn
GO Anderson, lord heaven help us from stupid people
Is this another angle, bachman, palin clone???





JstAnotherSub -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 6:56:02 PM)

http://collarchat.com/m_1742543/mpage_1/tm.htm

Mom was sent back to Mexico.  No such thing as anchor babies.

edit to try to fix link.




juliaoceania -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 6:58:28 PM)

That link did not work




JstAnotherSub -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 7:09:41 PM)

Try it again.  It is working for me.




juliaoceania -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 7:11:41 PM)

I hit it and it just takes me to the forum page




JstAnotherSub -> RE: Fact-checking the claims about 'anchor babies' and whether illegal immigrants 'drop and leave (8/13/2010 7:18:01 PM)

Blah.  I tried to fix it.  If this doesn't work, I dunno-lol.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
5.078125E-02