|
lally2 -> RE: Monogamy Agonistes (8/29/2010 2:39:28 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: masterpdg
I am fairly sure I never used the word fake. Interesting that it should be used repeatedly in response. I fully believe that polygamy is not necessary for a good relationship. I say only that a woman completely serious about belong and being owned should never try to limit her Master's enjoyment and understand that cultural biases should not stand in the way of dedication to service that is all. I hope every young lady on here finds the Master of her dreams, but no one has addressed the substantive arguments.
FR - cos this jumped out at me and i havent read the rest of it, so appologies if this is after the event - ill post this and probably find pages of banter and itll stick out like a sore bum, never mind, here goes anyway........,
thats all very well, but youre assuming that all men are capable of runing a poly household, it just isnt so. my ex Master was pants at it, and he wont mind me saying that cos he readily admits it.. no matter how hard the subs/slaves try to share and pull together differences occur, its human nature, jealousy and insecurity develops if the guy isnt on top of it all. it isnt just the rose coloured spectacled pandoras box of choccies you seem to be suggesting.
if you really are capable of runing a poly household then theres really nothing to stop you - but you have to engender faith in the sub or slave that youre up to the job first.
|
|
|
|
