|
Aynne88 -> RE: Fair play (9/1/2010 8:23:23 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: littlewonder
call me materialistic <shrug>. Makes no difference to me. I still hold that if out on a first date I prefer a man to pay. It's old fashioned values of where I grew up in a small town where men were men, the breadwinners, head of the household, the Godhead and the leaders of the community.
A man would invite a woman out to a dinner and actually delighted in paying because it showed him as a breadwinner, someone who had leadership skills, was able to take care of his household and people looked up to in the community. Yeah I find those types of men to be incredibly hot.
Those men who don't want to pay and see it as a woman just being a bitch...well that's why I never dated those types of men. They usually showed their true colors waaaayyyy before we ever got to the point of going out to dinner.
Like I said it seems the art of seduction, of wooing a lady are long gone and dead with the current environment. It's sad actually.
I'm with littlewonder, and just fine with that stance. I don't date men that can't or won't pay for dates, or anything else. I have a degree in business management, I keep a spotless house, gourmet cook, no children, and I will cater to your every whim shoud I deem myself to become your woman...but I am not paying. Hold on to your hat NG, but I also rather expect gifts, and nice vehicles, vacations, all of the accoutrements of dating someone of a certain stature and economic class. I am with a man that wanted an educated woman with a certain skill set and no children, in return I wanted someone very financially set and generous, who was willing to pay for almost everything in return for what kind of devotion and obedience among other things his previous wives were not willing to do for hom. Their loss. I will use whatever I have to barter with to get the kind of man I want and in a long term committed relationship it's really only the two people in it that have a say, and we both say it's pretty perfect.
|
|
|
|
