Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
[Poll]

FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS?


FOR
  83% (64)
AGAINST
  16% (13)


Total Votes : 77


(last vote on : 8/31/2010 9:12:33 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:15:44 PM   
Saykiatric


Posts: 316
Joined: 6/15/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan


quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

The current Mods ROCK.  They are WAY more forgiving than some of the past mods.   If you find yourself at odds with the mods, then perhaps you should take a reality check of YOUR behaviour....


Quoted for truth.

Well will you learn shoulding on people is in poor taste. You "should" be more considerate to me desires! You have the wrong way and my way.

(in reply to SylvereApLeanan)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:17:11 PM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
I would make a bad mod for the opposite reason. I would let almost EVERYTHING fly.

Many folks would still get notes telling them what I thought of them though.

If anyone here ever gets a note saying, " stupid post, but I will let it stand. douche""

You will know I am a mod.


_____________________________

"If you don't live it, it won't come out your horn." Charlie Parker

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:19:47 PM   
Saykiatric


Posts: 316
Joined: 6/15/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: switch2please

The only campfire song I know is "Take Your Finger Outta My Ass Because I'm Leavin' You Behind..."

Wait. That's country. Sorry.   (Robin Williams; I can't take credit for that)


My Bunny Lies Over My Doggy(sung to the tune of "My Bonnie Lies Over the Ocean")

My pets were out practicing football.
My frog intercepted a pass.
My cat and my dog and my bunny
then tackled him flat on the grass.

My bunny lies over my doggy.
My doggie's on top of my cat.
My kitty is over my froggy,
and that's why my froggy is flat.

CHORUS
Green splat. Green splat.
Oh, that's why my froggy is flat, like that.
Green splat. Green splat.
Oh, that's why my froggy is flat.

My froggy's as flat as a pancake.
A paper-thin froggy's the worst.
He cannot eat flies now for dinner
except when I flatten them first.

CHORUS

If you see your pets playing football,
it's best if you bring them inside
or you may end up with a froggy
who's flattened and seven feet wide.


(in reply to switch2please)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:21:56 PM   
Saykiatric


Posts: 316
Joined: 6/15/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

A few disclaimers first.

I did not answer the poll because it is too vague.

Unlike what some have assumed, I am not a Moderator.

I think there are some folks here who are very glad that I am not.

I'm very middle of the road about the Moderation.  I couldn't do the job Myself because, in My own admission, I would absolutely be biased.  I have a preference for those on the site who are involved in wiitwd and a lot less tolerance for the folks who haven't got any common sense.  This goes along very much with My style of Domination that is very obedience oriented.  I figure, people on the site were already given instructions on how to behave.  They really shouldn't have to be told twice. 

Folks can say what they will about past Moderation.  I didn't see it as unfair.  That includes the numerous love notes with a gold boarder that I received for Myself.

Quite frankly, this OP reminds Me of the concept of a submissive testing a Dominant (which VAA is, to the best of My knowledge) to see how far the Dominant can be pushed for the submissive to receive a punishment.  It's quite manipulative, and at this point, there is a clear no-win situation.  Either the Moderators will continue to allow the foot stomping and tantrums to continue, or they will Moderate so the OP can say "told ya so, Mods are biased".  If it were Me, I'd be more than willing to accept the outcome of the latter.  Unless I'm mistaken, the Mods really are members of the site just like anyone else.  They shouldn't be permitted to be attacked.


I never thought you were a Moderator your ego is to over inflated.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:27:08 PM   
Saykiatric


Posts: 316
Joined: 6/15/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

A few disclaimers first.

I did not answer the poll because it is too vague.

Unlike what some have assumed, I am not a Moderator.

I think there are some folks here who are very glad that I am not.

I'm very middle of the road about the Moderation.  I couldn't do the job Myself because, in My own admission, I would absolutely be biased.  I have a preference for those on the site who are involved in wiitwd and a lot less tolerance for the folks who haven't got any common sense.  This goes along very much with My style of Domination that is very obedience oriented.  I figure, people on the site were already given instructions on how to behave.  They really shouldn't have to be told twice. 

Folks can say what they will about past Moderation.  I didn't see it as unfair.  That includes the numerous love notes with a gold boarder that I received for Myself.

Quite frankly, this OP reminds Me of the concept of a submissive testing a Dominant (which VAA is, to the best of My knowledge) to see how far the Dominant can be pushed for the submissive to receive a punishment.  It's quite manipulative, and at this point, there is a clear no-win situation.  Either the Moderators will continue to allow the foot stomping and tantrums to continue, or they will Moderate so the OP can say "told ya so, Mods are biased".  If it were Me, I'd be more than willing to accept the outcome of the latter.  Unless I'm mistaken, the Mods really are members of the site just like anyone else.  They shouldn't be permitted to be attacked.


Show me where anyone  has attacked anyone. oh great woman of wisdom.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:29:48 PM   
Saykiatric


Posts: 316
Joined: 6/15/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

In my case, the mods treated me rather fairly. TOS is clear, I was/am clearly a violator.

Others might have a different opinion.

At the end of the day I take some comfort in knowing I am not an asshole.

No you have earned your full ass credits come join my full ass club ~Jacks~

(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:33:47 PM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
Dude, you realy aren't good enough to play with me.

It would be to easy and no fun at all.

I certainly hope your experience here at CM greatly improves.



_____________________________

"If you don't live it, it won't come out your horn." Charlie Parker

(in reply to Saykiatric)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:35:31 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

You forgot the option that says that the mods are too lenient.


I was thinking that too.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:41:26 PM   
SubPet715


Posts: 337
Joined: 8/24/2010
From: Brooklyn, NY
Status: offline
Bold black text, consecutive postings...I didn't want to let it be known but I mod about 4 high traffic forums none having to do with kink but all having about 10 times as more trolls, junk threads, reposts, zombie threads, and general jackassery and as a mod i'm no where near as lenient as the mods have been to let this continue. I don't believe in that sort of freedom on the forums I mod because the children online can't learn to play nice, they need to be ruled and live in constant fear of the ban hammer.

Your type comes just before actual threats and messages saying that you can beat up people in real life.

Thats what I have to say about that.

/Thread

_____________________________

Passion isn't really happiness.

(in reply to Saykiatric)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:44:10 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

You forgot the option that says that the mods are too lenient.


I was thinking that too.


Pffffffttttt, those are just the whiny, overly SENSITIVE, pussies!!!


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:44:25 PM   
WinsomeDefiance


Posts: 6719
Joined: 8/7/2007
Status: offline
I voted for moderation.

The only reason I bothered with the poll at all, is I think that the moderators need to know that they have support. Moderating is, for the most part, a thankless job. It is my opinion that anyone volunteering their time to work on a forum must have a genuine care for the site to take on the task, else why would they bother? There's no pay, no perks, no real reason to do so other than a personal belief that one is doing their part to support something they believe in. Someone dedicated enough to overlook the slights, bitching, complaints and general lack of appreciation, and continue to do a thankless job, while doing their best to enforce rules to the best of their ability, has earned my vote.

Finally, I'm glad there are some boundaries in place preventing me from voicing my opinion about certain individuals. I'd very likely take entirely too much delight in doing so in the moment, but regret it later, so I'm thankful there's boundaries that help me avoid that entire unpleasant moral angst.


(in reply to Saykiatric)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:45:28 PM   
GreedyTop


Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline
Jeffff.. youre just a fluffy anteater.. admit it ;)

_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

(in reply to SubPet715)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:46:37 PM   
Saykiatric


Posts: 316
Joined: 6/15/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SubPet715

Bold black text, consecutive postings...I didn't want to let it be known but I mod about 4 high traffic forums none having to do with kink but all having about 10 times as more trolls, junk threads, reposts, zombie threads, and general jackassery and as a mod i'm no where near as lenient as the mods have been to let this continue. I don't believe in that sort of freedom on the forums I mod because the children online can't learn to play nice, they need to be ruled and live in constant fear of the ban hammer.

Your type comes just before actual threats and messages saying that you can beat up people in real life.

Thats what I have to say about that.

/Thread

For the love of .......GIVE me that soap box! and the hair brush mic as well....do they know you are out of your cell again?

(in reply to SubPet715)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:49:27 PM   
OttersSwim


Posts: 2860
Joined: 9/1/2008
Status: offline
Topics like this are pure mental masturbation...







Attachment (1)

_____________________________

I am on a journey of authenticity and self.

(in reply to Saykiatric)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:51:31 PM   
SubPet715


Posts: 337
Joined: 8/24/2010
From: Brooklyn, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Saykiatric

quote:

ORIGINAL: SubPet715

Bold black text, consecutive postings...I didn't want to let it be known but I mod about 4 high traffic forums none having to do with kink but all having about 10 times as more trolls, junk threads, reposts, zombie threads, and general jackassery and as a mod i'm no where near as lenient as the mods have been to let this continue. I don't believe in that sort of freedom on the forums I mod because the children online can't learn to play nice, they need to be ruled and live in constant fear of the ban hammer.

Your type comes just before actual threats and messages saying that you can beat up people in real life.

Thats what I have to say about that.

/Thread

For the love of .......GIVE me that soap box! and the hair brush mic as well....do they know you are out of your cell again?



Hmm...gonna let someone else say something now...

_____________________________

Passion isn't really happiness.

(in reply to Saykiatric)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:51:47 PM   
Saykiatric


Posts: 316
Joined: 6/15/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

I voted for moderation.

The only reason I bothered with the poll at all, is I think that the moderators need to know that they have support. Moderating is, for the most part, a thankless job. It is my opinion that anyone volunteering their time to work on a forum must have a genuine care for the site to take on the task, else why would they bother? There's no pay, no perks, no real reason to do so other than a personal belief that one is doing their part to support something they believe in. Someone dedicated enough to overlook the slights, bitching, complaints and general lack of appreciation, and continue to do a thankless job, while doing their best to enforce rules to the best of their ability, has earned my vote.

Finally, I'm glad there are some boundaries in place preventing me from voicing my opinion about certain individuals. I'd very likely take entirely too much delight in doing so in the moment, but regret it later, so I'm thankful there's boundaries that help me avoid that entire unpleasant moral angst.



You at least got one part right. RAVE ON!!

< Message edited by Saykiatric -- 8/30/2010 1:54:50 PM >

(in reply to WinsomeDefiance)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:55:48 PM   
Icarys


Posts: 5757
Status: offline
Is that you Myles? lol

_____________________________

submission - the feeling of patient, submissive humbleness - the state of being submissive or compliant; meekness.

Alaska Bound-The Official Countdown Has Started!
http://tinyurl.com/872mcu3
http://alturl.com/mog7m

(in reply to Saykiatric)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 1:58:14 PM   
Icarys


Posts: 5757
Status: offline
quote:

I never thought you were a Moderator your ego is to over inflated.

If it was true (Which I believe it may be) she won't be able to see it.


_____________________________

submission - the feeling of patient, submissive humbleness - the state of being submissive or compliant; meekness.

Alaska Bound-The Official Countdown Has Started!
http://tinyurl.com/872mcu3
http://alturl.com/mog7m

(in reply to Saykiatric)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 2:00:15 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Saykiatric
I never thought you were a Moderator your ego is to over inflated.


Actually, there are people on this thread who have said on other threads that they thought I was a Mod.  They can reveal themselves if they like.
quote:

ORIGINAL: Saykiatric
Show me where anyone  has attacked anyone. oh great woman of wisdom.


Thank you for appreciating My wisdom. 

Just because some of your posts have been pulled, doesn't mean they never existed.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to Saykiatric)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/30/2010 2:02:52 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Icarys
If it was true (Which I believe it may be) she won't be able to see it.


An overinflated ego would be one who can not accomplish those things which a person professes that they can do.  When that happens, I'm sure you will let Me know. 


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to Icarys)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109