FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS?

FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity

[Poll]

FOR

83% (64)

AGAINST

16% (13)

Total Votes : 77

(last vote on : 8/31/2010 9:12:33 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )

Message

Saykiatric -> FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:17:02 PM)
How many feel that Moderators abuse the power given to them and are biased against unpopular questions and opinions for example this Poll which may get pulled for even asking such a question. where as others regarding Moderators have not been pulled in fact the Moderators have joined in on the post. Who feels it is acceptable to put a two week or more waiting to be approved censor on an individual to protect the hyper sensitive from getting their feelings hurt. and While the individual is in "time out" as I have seen a Moderator put it. It is perfectly OK for the protected to taunt and make fun of the censored individual with no consequence. This should be a good one if it stands.

switch2please -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:25:39 PM)
...you do realize the moderators are the only ones saving you from The Clique, don't you?

stef -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:25:49 PM)
Some people just aren't too bright... ~stef

mnottertail -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:27:27 PM)
That would be biased, first of all. Second, I would have to know your stand on icepicking people in the forehead for cause, before I can answer your questions.

OttersSwim -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:28:22 PM)
OP, time to go find something else to occupy your time. Posting polls railing against internet forum moderators is about as useful as a chocolate teapot...[8\|]

Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:28:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail That would be biased, first of all. Second, I would have to know your stand on icepicking people in the forehead for cause, before I can answer your questions. I WANT an Ice cream cone HOW are you doing THAT!!!

AquaticSub -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:28:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: switch2please ...you do realize the moderators are the only ones saving you from The Clique, don't you? That sounds like it should be the name of a bad 50s horror movie.

Hillwilliam -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:30:39 PM)
The mods are human, Sometimes they favor one person over another. I have seen people censored for attacking when they were responding to an attack upon themselves. Was the original attacker put in "time out"? Nope. but that's gonna happen when you have humans in charge.

switch2please -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:31:21 PM)
YES!! Who wants to get the popcorn?

Icarys -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:32:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Saykiatric How many feel that Moderators abuse the power given to them and are Bias against unpopular questions and opinions for example this Poll which may get pulled for even asking such a question. where as others regarding Moderators have not been pulled in fact the Moderators have joined in on the post. Who feels it is acceptable to put a two week or more waiting to be approved censor on an individual to protect the hyper sensitive from getting their feelings hurt. and While the individual is in "time out" as I have seen a Moderator put it. It is perfectly OK for the protected to taunt and make fun of the censored individual with no consequence. This should be a good one if it stands. You've got it a little easier..Trust me. When Mod11 was around..It was an all out war with her compared to the Mods around today. I understand your disdain for what you see as bias but they are okay in my book...I say this knowing I'll probably get moderated in the future. It's my destiny[:D]

mnottertail -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:32:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Saykiatric quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail That would be biased, first of all. Second, I would have to know your stand on icepicking people in the forehead for cause, before I can answer your questions. I WANT an Ice cream cone HOW are you doing THAT!!! When you get moderated as much as I do, all the while giving moderators the guilty pleasure of a laugh riot, but still gotta bust the ol' 'tail..........well, you can sorta get offers............

DarkSteven -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:35:56 PM)
You forgot the option that says that the mods are too lenient.

horizonz -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:37:30 PM)
Moderators are human --they are going to make mistakes -- but cm without mods would be [sm=anger.gif]!!!

Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:38:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: switch2please ...you do realize the moderators are the only ones saving you from The Clique, don't you? You obviously do not realize I have not asked to be saved. unlike others ;)

Rule -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:39:25 PM)
I think the Mods love CM and do their utmost to police it fairly. Nevertheless they are humans and will err or be overzealous, and allowances should be made for that and leniency extended. This site would be worse without Mods. By the way, I am considering hiding your posts from my view. I am curious when the last drop falls and that decision will occur.

Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:40:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam The mods are human, Sometimes they favor one person over another. I have seen people censored for attacking when they were responding to an attack upon themselves. Was the original attacker put in "time out"? Nope. but that's gonna happen when you have humans in charge. Agreed.

GreedyTop -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:40:54 PM)
The current Mods ROCK. They are WAY more forgiving than some of the past mods. If you find yourself at odds with the mods, then perhaps you should take a reality check of YOUR behaviour....

mnottertail -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:41:32 PM)
""""""""""""""""suckass!!!!!"""""""""""""""" LOL.

GreedyTop -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:43:16 PM)
you're only jealous because I havent sucked your dick :)

Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 12:44:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Icarys quote: ORIGINAL: Saykiatric How many feel that Moderators abuse the power given to them and are Bias against unpopular questions and opinions for example this Poll which may get pulled for even asking such a question. where as others regarding Moderators have not been pulled in fact the Moderators have joined in on the post. Who feels it is acceptable to put a two week or more waiting to be approved censor on an individual to protect the hyper sensitive from getting their feelings hurt. and While the individual is in "time out" as I have seen a Moderator put it. It is perfectly OK for the protected to taunt and make fun of the censored individual with no consequence. This should be a good one if it stands. You've got it a little easier..Trust me. When Mod11 was around..It was an all out war with her compared to the Mods around today. I understand your disdain for what you see as bias but they are okay in my book...I say this knowing I'll probably get moderated in the future. It's my destiny[:D] OH yes ModEleven and myself went back and forth for some time ended up spilling over into my email I do not miss her in the slightest.....I did loose count of how many threats I received I got word she was given the boot this pleases me greatly to hear true or not that possibly action was taken against one who was out of control. I Also just got wind that the Mods are all women that would be most odd.

Page: [1] 2 3 4 5 next > >>

Spam Policy

0.03125