joether
Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005 Status: offline
|
Unions just like any other group in America: Some are really good and others not so good. Some become antagonistic (like some of you posters), simply seem to hold a vendetta with management. But most unions, do work with the companies they are around. Since, a union allows an employee to state a process or concept is not well thought out to management, and not being put at risk for a firing. It also helps protect workers from abusive policies, or create unsafe workspaces (physically, mentally, spiritually, oh yes, even morally). Almost every labor practice Americans enjoy today, has its roots in the labor union as a concept. Just as the concept of 'the corporation' has given Americans benefits and abilities that did not exist before. But to make a blind, sweeping arguement of hatred towards unions is rather silly. Traditionally, the labor union has voted Democrat, and executives and higher level salaried employees (non-union members), voted Republican. As such, most seem to accept that putting political pressure on unions, was the result of Republican action(s), while a great emphasis on the American worker, was by actions of labor unions. Yes, there has been conflict, and usually for the most part, it has been a good thing. How many of those people unemployed right now, would like to have had a say, in their job being laid off, and the company moving production to another country? That is the principle reason for a union: to give the worker a fair say in the operation, and not as a slave. That is, when you think about it, a pretty American concept: every person is an equal; and some are not considered 'more equal' then the rest. And as we've seen, some union officals, believe they are 'more equal' then others, and try to exter their influence on the company for personal reasons. Its when a select few union and management guys get in to a serious set of arguements, that drags the rest of the company in to the problem; and some of those, have nothing to do with the company (like being members of two different gun clubs). For the most part, I stay neutral on disputes between a company and union, until I have a better sense of the issues and motives. Some unions make good arguements, and sometimes the executives put forth good arguements. Sometimes they both do, and others, neither. But if your going to bash one or the other, because of your political philosophy; then its fair to say, you have a bias and would not make a good judge in the debate.
|