RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


jillian4you4fun -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/12/2010 8:46:48 AM)

For starters
Someone wanna explain who was wearing workboots on the moon?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzkoG0SIEcs




rulemylife -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/12/2010 9:03:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls

Another good question. Why did Buzz Aldrin sock the snot out of a guy when he asked him to swear on the bible that he actually stepped foot on the moon.

Most people would do it without even thinking twice about it. But for Buzz Aldrin, he didn't like the idea that someone was questioning him.



Probably because Aldrin knows an idiot when he sees one and he doesn't like idiots.




Twoshoes -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/12/2010 9:05:11 AM)

I own the Moon.
No more unwelcome visitors, thank you.




sappatoti -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/12/2010 9:12:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jillian4you4fun
For starters
Someone wanna explain who was wearing workboots on the moon?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzkoG0SIEcs

Those who are continuing to perpetrate hoax stories really need to get their act together. Same photo composition, different source. You decide.

http://www.xomba.com/apollo_11_hoax_photos_8_moon_landing_myths_busted




cuckoldmepls -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/12/2010 9:29:08 AM)

Holy crap, I spotted the foot print even before they pointed it out. It's obviously not an astronaut boot.




sappatoti -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/12/2010 9:30:14 AM)

And you obviously, then, did not look at the photo in my link for in that photo, the workboot footprint isn't there.




DCWoody -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/12/2010 9:40:38 AM)

Technically he's correct, it's not an 'astronaut boot' if it's shoop. I suspect he's just pulling your (our) leg since the whole 'satellite photos of my house on google earth' thing.




sappatoti -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/12/2010 9:44:48 AM)

Or cucky may be ignoring other photographic evidence, hoax or not, that doesn't show the boot at all (as in my previous post).

It's interesting that these "anomalies" only appear on lower resolution, course grained material and not the crisper, higher resolution shots. Gee... I wonder why. [:D]




thornhappy -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/12/2010 12:28:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Twoshoes
I own the Moon.
No more unwelcome visitors, thank you.

So YOU'RE the one who put up that honkin' big "No Trespassing" sign on the Sea of Tranquility!!!




Carouselambra -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/12/2010 10:27:09 PM)

This is a very successful troll. 




Twoshoes -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/12/2010 10:50:17 PM)

Thank you for your flattery. [;)]
However, this will not be sufficient to get you to the moon.

Now back to the serious issue at hand:
Is there factual proof of the trespassing and does it legally warrant financial or material compensation?




MistressRosalyn -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/13/2010 12:32:54 AM)

I do believe that we landed on the moon multiple times, and that we brought back samples of lunar material. I could go on for hours about why I believe this, but I won't.

But isn't it interesting that NASA still gets so het up whenever there is even a hint of a bit of Lunar material going astray? Wonder why that is?
Then there is the Honduran moon rock...'In November 1996, Rosen had the sample tested at Harvard University, where "Electron Microprobe Specialist" David Lange confirmed in a letter that "the mineral compositions and textural information are consistent with the rock chip being a sample from lunar rock 70017."'

Lunar rocks have a distinct composition, which can be identified. We have approximately 862 pounds of lunar material that is not from a meteorite, and it has been in the possession of NASA since December 1973, at the least. If we didn't land on the moon, how did we get it?




MistressRosalyn -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/13/2010 12:34:09 AM)

So yeah TwoShoes, you can nail us for theft, too! 




Termyn8or -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/13/2010 4:46:08 AM)

FR

One thing I've noticed about conspiracy nuts is that they think they know more than most, that they aren't fooled by the PTB, that they are somehow special. This is different than conspiracy theorists, if the meaning of the words is taken literally, that is reading the lines rather than in between the lines. In the true sense of the term I qualify as a conspiracy theorist, but not a nut. I accept that the suits lie, they have false flag operations, and all kinds of shit. I only believe half of what I see. Then there is the third group who blindly follow like sheeple and poo poo anything that goes against accepted "facts". Well as they say it takes all kinds, and obviously we have them all right here.

NOW DO NOT IGNORE THIS POST ! I want a fucking answetr to the ensuing question and I want it from someone with at least some scientific background. I was a younster when all this happened and I studied the whole thing fervently, I was extremely interested in astronomy of all kinds, anything off the Earth I wanted to know. I studied and understand just how a moonshot is accomplished, because I made it a point to know. There are a myriad of problems not the least of which is getting the craft out of geosychronous orbit onto a bit straighter path to the moon, this with puny little rockets that wouldn't fire an ICBM, but it must be done or the trip would take so long it would have been forgotten by the time they got back. Then reestablishing the otbit so that the capsule is not moving at 11,000 MPH horizontally upon reentry. All these things I studied AT THE TIME. Did you ?

Now IF the moonshot really happened I know a hell of alot about just how it was done. I followed the progress of the whole thing AT THE TIME to the exclusion of all else, so I pretty much know how it worked.

Now there seem to be brainiacs around here who know more that Russian astronomers, people who went to schools of the time and studied hard sciences instead of the mating habits of the red footed booby and all kinds of stupid, useless shit they fill the kids' minds with these days. Like what genus is this bird, who the fuck cares ? This is why this country is fucking useless.

Now I can give quite a bit of detail about just how a moonshot, or any interplanetary travel is accomplished. If you would like a thirty page post, I'll get right on it, but the burden of proof is not upon me, as I did not assert the conspiracy theory.

I want just one of you who thinks the moonshot was a hoax to tell me just how the hoax was perpetrated.

I WANT AN ANSWER. YES I AM YELLING. You tell me brainiacs, how they pulled this off when Russia, which surprising to most were neck and neck with us in technology, was watching like a hawk. Tell me how they fooled astronomers all over the world, or are you so narrow minded to think that the only telescopes in the world are in the US and occupied by the CIA during the whole thing ? Did you think the rest of the world was stupid ?

If you, any of you had any significant knowledge of the subject you would know that it would be just as difficult and expensive to fake, as to actually accomplish.

I want it all, where did they hide that craft for the duration ? How did they tell even amateur astronomers about the course corrections required so they could see the ship with their telescopes, and the trajectory made sense to anyone who knows their math ?

Remember, they used to sell telescopes all over the place, Department stores had some quite powerful (and expensive) models all on display. And Edmund Scientific was not a friggin toy store at the time either. They are shit now but if you look at one of their catalogues from that time there is a BIG difference. That was when this country excelled in the hard sciences, rather than thievery.

And with all the cost of faking it, you might include the reason for faking it.(to appease JFK maybe ? ) NASA was fully aware that the Russians were right there, they knew everyone would be watching and surely they hadn't coopted each and every astronomer in the world. During the cold war ? Yeah right. Can you imagine the notariety a Russian astronomer would get for uncovering such a hoax ? So they were quite impelled to do so, but they didn't/couldn't. To assert that would be to say that the entire cold war was a fake, which is a possibility, so if you can get past all the science to MY satifisfaction, include a corrollory about the "fake" cold war as well.

Do it. Those who doubt the validity of the moonshot are now conspiracy nuts until proven otherwise. This is page four of this thread and I don't want to hear about any fucking bootprints. I want the mechanics of the scam. If you think you are smarter than everyone else, FUCKING PROVE IT.

And remember I was there, and I was not playing baseball. I am no dummy when it comes to this shit, and I have made my assertion. What's more the Russians were not stupid either, in fact they actually beat us into space, and we only beat them to the moon by a matter of months. And don't give me any cockamamie asshole websites either written by people who were born twenty year later, I WAS THERE !

PROVE IT TO ME, not that it was faked, just tell me how it was/could be faked. This is page four of this thread, I will be watching.

And just to give you some incentive, if noone steps up to the plate with some hard science, you think people pollute threads now ? Well that's the challenge. Do it or else I will wreck each and every thread on this board that deals with anything scientific. Other people do it, and they do it with a hell of alot less ammunition.

Enough said, you have your task.

T




MistressRosalyn -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/13/2010 3:33:31 PM)

Damn Termy, way to kill a thread, just go and introduce logic!





Hippiekinkster -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/13/2010 3:54:59 PM)

I find it almost beyond belief that Cucky actually, serendipitously, managed to find his way to Earth.




cuckoldmepls -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/15/2010 1:08:50 PM)

Ok, here's the photographic proof we landed on the moon, NOT!!! This is the best they can do from a sophistacated military orbiter. Bullshit.

http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/apollo15_touchdown_photos_010427.html




mnottertail -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/15/2010 1:12:44 PM)

Your argument lacks a certain sophistication, a certain je ne sais quoi, know whadda mean Vern?




EbonyWood -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/15/2010 1:34:22 PM)

Definitive proof we landed on the moon. NASA keeps these 12 beings in a secret hangar for experimental purposes.
 
Cuck is second from right, center row.

[image]local://upfiles/139210/62DB8F2A9D7D4C33A07A221A8C3D518C.jpg[/image]




cuckoldmepls -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/15/2010 1:42:30 PM)

Now look at these official nasa photographs claiming that apollo 14 can be spotted. It claims there is a shadow created by the lunar lander, but if you look at everything else in the picture, nothing else has a shadow, and unless the moon is perfectly flat, that doesn't make sense.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/apollosites.html




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875