RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message

gungadin09 -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/15/2010 1:49:04 PM)

You guys are so naive. Do you actually believe there is a moon?

pam



EbonyWood -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/15/2010 1:54:28 PM)

'Blue Figment Of Our Imagination' wasn't catchy enough to release.
 
Nor 'Nonexistant Satellite River'.
 
Cuck mighta bought it though...



PeonForHer -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/15/2010 1:55:04 PM)

Eh?  All the craters have shadows.



mnottertail -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/15/2010 1:59:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls

Now look at these official nasa photographs claiming that apollo 14 can be spotted. It claims there is a shadow created by the lunar lander, but if you look at everything else in the picture, nothing else has a shadow, and unless the moon is perfectly flat, that doesn't make sense.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/apollosites.html



You have a PhD in green cheese physics, then? 



Termyn8or -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/15/2010 6:22:59 PM)

Been two days folks. I am still waiting.

T



thornhappy -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/15/2010 6:41:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls
Ok, here's the photographic proof we landed on the moon, NOT!!! This is the best they can do from a sophistacated military orbiter. Bullshit.

http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/apollo15_touchdown_photos_010427.html

Hey cuck, are you just having us on, or do you really believe it was a hoax?

'Cause if you believe it's a hoax, you've got a serious lack of logical reasoning skills.

Laser retroreflectors were left on the moon and are still used to this day.  I guess aliens left those there, too.

Oh, and I forgot about the seismometers left there too.  They weren't shut down until 1977.  It was a long commute to replace the paper, so they sent the readings over a comm link.



cuckoldmepls -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/16/2010 7:40:35 PM)

Hey Einstein, I repeat for the 100th time. I didn't say we didn't land on the moon. I said how many of you automatically believe we landed on the moon just because the government told you we did. It's our duty and right as Americans to ask as many questions as we want, and demand answers when the story doesn't add up. Personally, I think we probably did land on the moon, but there is just so much strange evidence out there, I can't be sure.

Plus, it may not have been possible to put a man on the moon back then, but I'm not saying a basic landing craft with rudimentary electric mower type robotics couldn't position seismometers and reflectors.

Think about this too. Richard Nixon was in charge back then. That SOB was the biggest crook we ever had as President, and gives Obama a run for the money when it comes to lying to the American people. There's no doubt in my mind that he could have authorized a cover up of this magnitude.

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/moon.htm



thornhappy -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/16/2010 8:31:04 PM)

They didn't have that kind of robotics back then. Remember how primitive the computers were? 

Do you think that a corrupt incompetent government could generate a hoax of that magnitude without someone spilling the beans?  That no one in NASA would blow the whistle? 

It is simply impossible to generate a hoax of that magnitude.  You'd need to simulate the reduced gravity and vacuum, and do this over miles of terrain.  Special effects weren't up to the job back then.





Termyn8or -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/17/2010 5:01:09 AM)

Now don't that beat all. Again and again we have people complaining that posters make assertions without giving any evidence and along comes one who brings all kinds of (flimsy at best) evidence yet claims not to make the assertion.

Also, speaking of blindly believing ;

"Richard Nixon was in charge back then. That SOB was the biggest crook we ever had as President, and gives Obama a run for the money when it comes to lying to the American people."

That is one of the stupidest things I have read all week, and it is Friday so I don't think anyone can top it, at least this week. If you knew a goddamn thing about the way things are done you would have never made such a statement. You seem to be in love with a proven liar - GWB, and simply take the word of others about "Tricky Dicky", most of which is false. You were a kid then, you didn't know shit from shinola. Apparently you haven't learned much.

What's more Nixon did not break into the Watergate, it was done on his behalf and he was deemed responsible, there is no proof that he ordered it. This contrasts absolute proof that GWB and GHWB lied. The problem I had with Nixon was the wage and price freeze which I, even then deemed totally unconstitutional, as bad as the patriot act.

You apparently know very little about science and technology, I would like to see a lawnmower built in the late 1960s use a sextant etc. and figure out zenith, angle of declination and such to install that mirror with enough accuracy to bounce a laser beam back from a quarter million miles away.

Start more threads like this, this was fun, You call people Einstein, shit like this makes me feel like I am Einstein, keep up the good work.

T



sappatoti -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/17/2010 5:46:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: gungadin09
You guys are so naive. Do you actually believe there is a moon?

pam

[:D]

Thanks for the smile, Pam.



MasterJohnSteed -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/17/2010 12:10:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls

How many of you actually believe everything the government tells you, and you believe that we really did land on the moon??? Let me ask you one question.

If they can take a satelite picture of the shed in your backyard, why haven't we ever seen telescopic pictures of our equipment left behind on the moon? Hubble is far more powerful than satellite photos, and there is no atmospheric interference.



Well Your Argument is in valid, since they have taken photo's of the moon with Hubble, as for taking pictures of that kind of detail, honestly Hubble isn't in orbit for that work, nor was it ever designed to do that type of work period,

It was designed for deep space objects not, to take super detail of near orbit objects.

NOW However, I do have to wonder why none and I mean ZERO astronauts have any memory of actually being on the moon. They have memories of going to the moon, landing, leaving etc but as for actual memories of being on the surface. They are totally blank and can't tell you what happened.




Termyn8or -> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? (9/17/2010 4:43:41 PM)

"NOW However, I do have to wonder why none and I mean ZERO astronauts have any memory of actually being on the moon."

Where did you dig that up ? Tell me more. I mean you think they would remember something like that right ? Or are they all old and senile now ? I'll even idle my challenge for more information on this particular point.

And all, I am still waiting for someone to give me a coherent explanaition of how the "hoax" was perpetrated. Is noone up to it ?

T



Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125