hertz
Posts: 1315
Joined: 8/7/2010 Status: offline
|
tazzygirl, I asked you why you think I hate Jews, and you gave me a comprehensive reply. I offer my explanation of why I think you have failed to answer the question below: quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Its simple. You offer no facts, only your opinion. This is untrue. I have offered plenty of hard fact to support my viewpoint, unfortunately you are too dumb to read it. that's not my fault. In any case, this would not be hatred of Jews. It is not hatred of Jews to offer an opinion. quote:
You attack anyone who disagrees with your position. I said you have hatred, you said that is a dumb position. It is not hatred of Jews to argue with you.. quote:
You keep insisting that the death of 66% of a race isnt significant enough to give the holocaust a jewish face. I disagree and so do many others. This is not hatred of Jews. quote:
I have pointed out that during the Indian Wars, it wasnt just native americans who were dying... yet they were called the Indian Wars. I didn't say this, you did. Either way, it is not hatred of Jews to hear you say this. quote:
You claim this... quote:
If its any help, I do hate what Israel has become - I'm not a keen fan of Apartheid and racism. It is not hatred of Jews to hate Apartheid Israel, or to hate racism. quote:
And this... quote:
I hate the land theft in the West Bank. The Jewish settlers need to be removed, forcibly if necessary. It is not hatred of Jews to hate illegal settlements and land theft. quote:
And this... quote:
I think the 1940s decision to transplant European Jews onto someone else's homeland was a huge mistake. But it's done. It is not hatred of Jews to believe the Zionist project was a mistake. quote:
And this... quote:
I believe the Jewish Holocaust narrative is a myth. I don't deny the Holocaust, but I do deny that the Jews were singled out over many other groups of people who were also the victims of the Nazi genocide. It is not hatred of Jews to agree the Holocaust happened, but to believe it affected many others beyond the Jews. quote:
Yet you offer nothing more than your opinion. And your opinion is extremely biased. You've already said this. It was not hatred of Jews the first time around, and nor is it this time. But it might be worth saying it again in case that changes. quote:
Now, taking the writings of a Polish Jew might give us all a better clue as to what was happening... In 1944, Polish Jew Raphael Lemkin coined the term genocide, applying it to Jews and Poles alike. In this small but thought-provoking book, Richard L. Rubenstein approaches the German Nazi exterminationist policies in much the same vein, while stressing the role of the modern state bureaucracy to make it possible. Probably the first step in genocide is the denial of the humanity of the intended victims: "Once the victim is categorized as belonging to a different species, the task of transforming him into a thing is immensely simplified...Before the Nazis assaulted the Jews, the Poles, the Russians, and the Gypsies, they were categorized as members of sub-human races."(p. 54). Terms such as Tiermenschen ("animal people") and Untermenschen ("subhumans") were commonly used. Rubenstein (p. 83) points out that Jews were often referred to as "a surplus population", but not the fact that the Germans also used this term for Poles. The denationalization of those intended for genocide was also significant: "Unfortunately, the Nazis clearly understood the importance of the question of statelessness. When they began to deport Jews from such occupied nations as France, Bulgaria, and Hungary, they insisted that the deportees be stripped of their citizenship by their respective governments no later than the day of deportation. There was no need to denationalize Polish and Russian Jews because the Nazis had destroyed the state apparatus as soon as they occupied the territory. The absence of a state apparatus in Poland and occupied Russia was an indication of the ultimate fate of the Poles and the Russians had the Germans won."(pp. 32-33). While the mass shootings and gassings of Jews were already well underway, the Germans set their sights higher. Rubenstein cites an October 13, 1942 letter by Otto Thierack, the German minister of justice: "With a view of freeing the German people of Poles, Russians, Jews, and Gypsies, and with a view to making the eastern territories which have been incorporated into the Reich available for settlement by German nationals, I intend to turn over criminal jurisdiction over Poles, Russians, Jews and Gypsies to the Reichsfuhrer-SS (Himmler). In doing so, I stand on the principle that the administration of justice can make only a small contribution to the extermination of these peoples." (p. 34). Richard L. Rubenstein comments: "Soviet domination of Eastern Europe was closer to that of a classical tyranny than was the German occupation. The German aims were far more radical. They sought to create a society of total domination involving initially the enslavement and extermination of the Jews and eventually similar treatment to other subject peoples. They were determined to clear a Lebensraum, a living space, for German settlement."(p. 76). Of course, owing at least in part to the much greater numbers of Poles than Jews, and despite the fact that 2-3 million Polish gentiles (including half of all educated Poles) were murdered before the Germans before the latter were finally driven out of Poland, the overall extermination of the Poles was more of a long-term German project. In this regard, practical methods of mass sterilization were actively being developed (p. 49), with the 3 million Russian POWs to be the first large-scale victims (p. 50). The Nazi goal was clear: "As we have noted, had the Germans won the war, mass sterilization would have been an important aspect of their program for the subject peoples. It must be remembered that with both the Nazis and the Bolsheviks, victory inevitably led to an intensification rather than a diminution of terror. Mass sterilizations of Poles, Russians and, in the more distance future, the French and the Italians, would have permitted the Germans to exploit the vanquished at their own convenience in the certain knowledge that the subject peoples' national existence was at an end. Whether extermination or killing was the means of securing absolute dominance or whether a certain number of the vanquished might be permitted to reproduce in exactly calculable quantities would have depended solely on the requirements of the German masters. The victims would have had as little control over their own destiny as cattle in a stockyard. In a society of total domination, helots could be killed, bred, or sterilized at will."(p. 52). http://www.very-clever.com/information/ddqakhdqoe More or less exactly what I have been saying. Have you been reading my comments at all? Or have you just been getting high on the opportunity to brand someone an anti-Semite? It is not hatred of Jews to read a link provided by you and agree with it. quote:
Now, you also seem to have overlooked the fact that the Holocaust Museum in the US has been around since 1993. It doesnt hide the fact that other nationalities died. Perhaps a perusual of that site may help your anger. It is not hatred of Jews to know something you are reporting as if I do not. quote:
Genocide... Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group.[1] While a precise definition varies among genocide scholars, a legal definition is found in the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG). Article 2 of this convention defines genocide as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."[2] Because of the influence of Joseph Stalin, this definition of genocide under international law does not include political groups.[3][4][5] The Convention (in article 2) defines genocide: ...any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. – Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide#cite_note-41 You are telling me something I already know. It's why I think Israeli is guilty of War Crimes. It is not hatred of Jews to believe War Criminals should be prosecuted. quote:
Now, here is my take on the whole thing. Hitler wanted the removal of what he believed to be an inferior race, the Jews. He made it a national policy to do just that. And no one did a damn thing. Giving Hitler the go ahead to do it to others. I have at no point denied that. What I have done is suggest, as you have (see your own link, above), that the Jews were not the only target, nor were they killed in any greater numbers than the Poles. It is not hatred of Jews to believe this. quote:
And in MY mind, thats why the Holocaust has a Jewish Face. I disagree. Apparently you think that is hatred of Jews. It isn't. quote:
First to be systematically targeted by a regime. Undisputed. Actually, disputed. The Herero and Namaqua were the first 20th century genocide victims. By 1908, 80% of their number had been wiped out. It was a German government which ordered the genocide. It is not hatred of Jews to point out an elementary mistake you have made. Victims of the Nazi genocide included Jews, Poles, Roma and others who were all slaughtered in the same timeframe. Disputing your interpretation of the facts is not hatred of Jews. quote:
Loss of 66% of its population... the largest loss recorded during the Holocaust. Undisputed. No-one is disputing this. It is not hatred of Jews to not dispute this. quote:
And, im willing to bet if you ask a Pole, they are simply grateful that the Holocaust is not allowed to die in the memories of the world powers. If we forget, it may be repeated. I agree. This, too, is not hatred of Jews. It is not hatred of Jews to agree with you. quote:
These are what i know. These are also what you know. Yet your anger and hatred towards a group doesnt allow you to accept these facts. As I have said many times before, I do not generally dispute your facts (except when you are in obvious error, and then I explain why you are wrong). But I do dispute the historical narrative you create around these facts. It is not hatred of Jews to disagree with you. quote:
Now, if you wish to address differences... The Jews lived in the countries where their laws made them less than human... among their own countrymen. Poland was conquered. I have no idea what you are saying. It is not hatred of Jews to have no idea what you are saying. So, we started with me asking you why you presume I hate Jews, and you quoted that post back at me, added some stuff I agree with, and a little more that I am already aware of. I have tried my best to explain why you have not really answered my question, and am willing to discuss any of the points further if required. I still don't understand why you believe I hate Jews. I believe it is not hatred of Jews not to understand why you think I hate Jews.
|