Kirata
Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006 From: USA Status: offline
|
Thank you. 1. http://www.collarchat.com/m_3366610/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#3366610 2. http://www.collarchat.com/m_3350043/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#3351648 I am not fond of Feisal Abdul Rauf or the Sharia Index Project being run by the organization with which he is associated. That is not an attack on the religion of Islam. 3. http://www.collarchat.com/m_2559257/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#2559342 This was a comment on the practice of honor killing, not an attack on the religion of Islam. 4. http://www.collarchat.com/m_3315941/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#3315941 From the same thread: The thing that I found difficult to resolve was the degree to which the judge gave consideration to what the mother had been through. I don't rule out giving someone a break on their sentence out of compassion. But a walk? In the face of forensic evidence that contradicts the story she told? More particularly: I excerpted the part of the story that was relevant to my question, namely, the report of her description of the incident and the contradicting forensic evidence. I did not make any comment connecting her religion to either the event or her sentence, and I fail to see how it could be connected. See also this: http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3317366 There was no attack on the religion of Islam here, and a re-reading of the thread (it's only four pages) will prove instructive in that regard for anyone interested in examining your claims. 5. http://www.collarchat.com/m_2637179/mpage_7/key_/tm.htm#2639529 This was simply observing that it seemed to me a bit of a stretch to employ the same terms to characterize isolated acts by Christian nut cases, on the one hand, and organized international terror organizations on the other. That is hardly an attack on the religion of Islam. So what we have here, in this little collection of links, is yet another example of the way in which you regard whatever half-baked conclusion jumps into your head as a gold-plated perception of reality, and the unethical lengths to which you will go to defend your delusions, ignoring anything that contradicts them and publishing lies about people on that convenient basis. K.
< Message edited by Kirata -- 10/11/2010 11:02:19 PM >
|